We are at the beginning of learning new functionalities.The problem was solved on the first try. It's very good for our needs. I would rate Microsoft Entra ID Protection a 10 out of 10.
Senior Solution Architect DataCenter & Cloud at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 10
Aug 26, 2025
The monitoring from Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides great visibility at a granular level. It provides all the details, including IP address, username, and permission or error logs. This information is available in both the audit log and regular log. The alert functionality supports general day-to-day monitoring and any violation or trigger for errors. Microsoft Entra ID Protection's features are suitable for all sizes of companies. It's a must-have product because traditionally Active Directory was used for identity and authentication on computers. Now, with hybrid capabilities, every company of any size needs these features and tools. I rate Microsoft Entra ID Protection ten out of ten.
Technical Consultant Security and Compliance at inSpark
Consultant
Top 5
Jun 11, 2025
I have experience with Copilot AI solutions from Microsoft, but it's not my focus. I can guide users on protecting their systems from risks associated with AI. Despite potential increased data leak risks with AI, it's not limited to Microsoft. I have limited experience with writing summaries for emails. I need to spend more time gaining proficiency in this. Microsoft is developing a replacement for traditional VPNs, enhancing connectivity while retaining the hybrid model, aiming to improve the integration of Microsoft Entra ID Protection features in existing environments. On a scale of one to ten, this solution receives a rating of 9.
Security Operations Team Leader at Yalla Security Srl
Real User
Top 5
Feb 6, 2025
I rate this product a solid eight out of ten. The function for cloud-to-local synchronization should be implemented as it is crucial for better access management.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Entra ID Protection. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2025.
The platform's conditional access features are satisfactory. For instance, I configured policies to require users to reauthenticate every eight hours and to restrict access through specific browsers. Based on my limited use cases, the performance seems adequate. However, further testing would be necessary for a more extensive evaluation. I rate it a nine out of ten.
During authorized access, the multi-factor authentication and the conditional access policies are good. Both features are largely associated with monitoring and preventing risks. I don't think I see any competitive vendor or product currently in the market that can give everything that Microsoft Entra ID Protection offers. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
I give Azure Active Directory Identity Protection an eight out of ten. We are not heavily using DLP at the moment, but we have started implementing it in our company. Along with Endpoint Manager, we also use Cloud App Security, which functions somewhat like an endpoint manager but is not a complete DLP solution. We have begun testing this feature recently, but we are not currently using it as a protection measure. Only a few people in my company, who are part of the testing team, have access to it. Once the testing is complete, we plan to implement it for broader use. Our organization utilizes Microsoft solutions because they are convenient and create a complete ecosystem. Active Directory has been our go-to choice because it integrates so well with our other Microsoft solutions. From day one, if we use any Microsoft solution, it will be available in our tenant. However, if we need to enhance or access other features, we will have to purchase a specific license to unlock the complete set of features beyond the basic ones in Active Directory. When we activate the office suite, the Active Directory will also be available. If we wish to add additional features, such as conditional access, I generally advise users to purchase an Azure Active Directory tier-one license based on their requirements. After obtaining the license, they can activate the desired security features or any other features they need.
The solution needs to be better marketed to the SMA segment because they are not as aware of information security. I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection enhances security through features like conditional access and multifactor authentication, optimizing identity management for enterprises. This robust solution ensures efficient control over access policies, supporting seamless integration and operational efficiency.Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides advanced identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities, supporting multifactor authentication and single sign-on to control digital...
We are at the beginning of learning new functionalities.The problem was solved on the first try. It's very good for our needs. I would rate Microsoft Entra ID Protection a 10 out of 10.
The monitoring from Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides great visibility at a granular level. It provides all the details, including IP address, username, and permission or error logs. This information is available in both the audit log and regular log. The alert functionality supports general day-to-day monitoring and any violation or trigger for errors. Microsoft Entra ID Protection's features are suitable for all sizes of companies. It's a must-have product because traditionally Active Directory was used for identity and authentication on computers. Now, with hybrid capabilities, every company of any size needs these features and tools. I rate Microsoft Entra ID Protection ten out of ten.
I have experience with Copilot AI solutions from Microsoft, but it's not my focus. I can guide users on protecting their systems from risks associated with AI. Despite potential increased data leak risks with AI, it's not limited to Microsoft. I have limited experience with writing summaries for emails. I need to spend more time gaining proficiency in this. Microsoft is developing a replacement for traditional VPNs, enhancing connectivity while retaining the hybrid model, aiming to improve the integration of Microsoft Entra ID Protection features in existing environments. On a scale of one to ten, this solution receives a rating of 9.
I rate this product a solid eight out of ten. The function for cloud-to-local synchronization should be implemented as it is crucial for better access management.
I rate Microsoft Entra ID Protection eight out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to other people. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
The platform's conditional access features are satisfactory. For instance, I configured policies to require users to reauthenticate every eight hours and to restrict access through specific browsers. Based on my limited use cases, the performance seems adequate. However, further testing would be necessary for a more extensive evaluation. I rate it a nine out of ten.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
During authorized access, the multi-factor authentication and the conditional access policies are good. Both features are largely associated with monitoring and preventing risks. I don't think I see any competitive vendor or product currently in the market that can give everything that Microsoft Entra ID Protection offers. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
I give Azure Active Directory Identity Protection an eight out of ten. We are not heavily using DLP at the moment, but we have started implementing it in our company. Along with Endpoint Manager, we also use Cloud App Security, which functions somewhat like an endpoint manager but is not a complete DLP solution. We have begun testing this feature recently, but we are not currently using it as a protection measure. Only a few people in my company, who are part of the testing team, have access to it. Once the testing is complete, we plan to implement it for broader use. Our organization utilizes Microsoft solutions because they are convenient and create a complete ecosystem. Active Directory has been our go-to choice because it integrates so well with our other Microsoft solutions. From day one, if we use any Microsoft solution, it will be available in our tenant. However, if we need to enhance or access other features, we will have to purchase a specific license to unlock the complete set of features beyond the basic ones in Active Directory. When we activate the office suite, the Active Directory will also be available. If we wish to add additional features, such as conditional access, I generally advise users to purchase an Azure Active Directory tier-one license based on their requirements. After obtaining the license, they can activate the desired security features or any other features they need.
I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
The solution needs to be better marketed to the SMA segment because they are not as aware of information security. I rate the solution a seven out of ten.