We are partners and distributors. We're resellers. I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten, and only due to the lack of the reverse NAT-ing capability. I'd advise a company if they are starting fresh inside Azure Greenfield, this is a good option. However, if they are looking at this solution are migrating or replacing the same network configuration from on-premise to Azure, they will have to modify a lot. If it has to be implemented, especially in a NAT-ed environment, some extra study has to be done.
CIT at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-06-15T13:04:00Z
Jun 15, 2021
We have a business application for public cloud and use Azure for this. We also have certain local installations, as well as some other hybrid clouds. So, this varies with the customer requirements. We must comply with customers who do not wish for their data to be outside their premises and for these we restore the system and database locally. Some use public cloud with no problem. Others want the application in the public cloud but their data insights to be on-premises. Consequently, we have different architecture for the same application. We have around five users making use of the solution. I would definitely recommend the solution to my clients, especially if one is using Azure Cloud. It is a very nice product.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Palo Alto Networks and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: October 2024.
Firewall Security Management solutions monitor, configure, and maintain your firewall infrastructure, ensuring robust protection against cyber threats. These solutions help automate firewall policy management, reduce human error, and enhance network security by providing centralized control over multiple firewalls.
I recomemnd this soltuion to others. I rate Azure Firewall Manager an eight out of ten.
I would rate the product a seven out of ten.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We are partners and distributors. We're resellers. I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten, and only due to the lack of the reverse NAT-ing capability. I'd advise a company if they are starting fresh inside Azure Greenfield, this is a good option. However, if they are looking at this solution are migrating or replacing the same network configuration from on-premise to Azure, they will have to modify a lot. If it has to be implemented, especially in a NAT-ed environment, some extra study has to be done.
We have a business application for public cloud and use Azure for this. We also have certain local installations, as well as some other hybrid clouds. So, this varies with the customer requirements. We must comply with customers who do not wish for their data to be outside their premises and for these we restore the system and database locally. Some use public cloud with no problem. Others want the application in the public cloud but their data insights to be on-premises. Consequently, we have different architecture for the same application. We have around five users making use of the solution. I would definitely recommend the solution to my clients, especially if one is using Azure Cloud. It is a very nice product.