Principal Cloud Architect at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-09-12T15:23:00Z
Sep 12, 2024
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) works. That said, it is not my preferred solution for running containers in the cloud. I would strongly prefer to use Amazon for critical workloads due to better documentation and support. I'd rate the solution five out of ten.
Senior technical project manager at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-06-03T10:15:00Z
Jun 3, 2024
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) can be easily integrated with other tools of the Azure environment. For our company projects where the solution is being used, I have onboarded them at a later stage, but rarely have I had to seek help from the support team. Documentations for the product are easily available. I would overall rate Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) a nine out of ten. I would definitely recommend the product to other users. For enterprise projects, where the clients have a heavy budget, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) can be adopted without any doubt.
Azure Kubernetes Service is a good solution for any organisation wanting to opt for containerization. AI can be integrated with the application. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) streamlines container deployment and management through our Jenkins pipelines. The continuous integration and deployment process involves fetching the code from Git, building it, containerizing it with Docker, and then deploying it. The scalability features have the most positive impact on our operations. As we experience a substantial increase in the number of users and the traffic to our applications grows yearly, it efficiently handles the heavy workload and concurrent transactions. Its managed services streamline scalability without the need for extensive capacity planning compared to a self-managed Kubernetes environment. This approach enhances operational efficiency and aligns with similar offerings in other cloud platforms, making managed services a preferred choice for many organizations. It is a highly reliable and secure product. I rate it an eight out of ten.
Every container and elastic service on each of the clouds is very similar. Still, Azure offers an increased layer of security based on many permissions that can be handled through Active Directory. Security-wise, Azure is the better cloud and solves many of the inherent security issues that Kubernetes had originally. From there, I feel permission management is much better. The UI is simpler to understand. I rate Azure Kubernetes Service a seven out of ten. It could be better, but it does its job very well.
Learn what your peers think about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
General Manager for Data and Software Engineering at Phillips
Real User
Top 5
2023-09-22T08:25:00Z
Sep 22, 2023
It really depends upon the usage. If they really have the use case to go cloud, they can use it, but still, it is more applicable for people who want to get into software engineering and web development. Especially in the financial domain or e-commerce, where you would be relying on websites. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
Nothing in Azure is as easy as plug-and-play. Most of the time, the product is cloud-based. There are on-premise solutions for very specific cases. As a representative of cybersecurity operations, I have to do research and read the manuals. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
My advice to others is to be aware of the in-depth setup. I rate AKS an eight out of ten. In general, building services within this solution can be complex and demanding, particularly in terms of the investment required for DevOps and SecOps. If your team lacks extensive technical expertise, it might be challenging to start directly with Kubernetes. However, if you have individuals with sufficient internet skills, you can leverage the scalability and simplicity offered by Kubernetes. Here, simplicity refers to the consistent experience compared to migrating from on-premise to the cloud. Nonetheless, the investment in pre-existing knowledge, appropriate SKUs, and skilled personnel is crucial. Applying Kubernetes is still not a straightforward task and requires careful consideration.
My advice for others is to focus more on packaging the individual models and cables before going to where the solution is situated. I rate AKS a six out of ten.
Solutions Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-04-06T15:25:10Z
Apr 6, 2023
We are using the latest version. If you plan to use this solution, you have to be good at troubleshooting, and you need to understand containerization really well. You need to know how to debug and understand other Azure products as well as Kubernetes. This is not for non-technical users. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
I give the solution a nine out of ten. Maintenance is much easier than an on-prem/self-hosted Kubernetes platform. Many of the tasks are automated by the cloud provider.
I would give the solution a nine out of ten since it is good. However, I would only recommend AKS to billion-dollar businesses that don’t mind spending. It is more for data storage, blockchain-related services, etc which offers very limited opportunities. So, I wouldn’t recommend it. There are multiple other ways to do it and improvise your profits rather than spending on those services. AWS and Azure are cloud services. They are also known as enterprise serverless architecture. Previously, we used to have server rooms where we used to deploy on-premises. Since the inception of AWS and Azure, they want you to deploy all the data onto their cloud. They offer microservices to facilitate interaction in the cloud. That is where they make money. We did the deployment for a production-based project. AWS has its own powerful Kubernetes. However, the cost of Azure was higher than Kubernetes at that time. But, there was something additional called Azure deployments. If you have your own product and want to deploy it into multiple client-related places or on-prem solutions, you need to download it as a blueprint and then upload it onto one more system, which is one great thing about Azure that Amazon does not provide. Kubernetes services, also known as elastic services, come with more clusters and is also very expensive. Suppose, your product needs to be used by just four organizations and a couple of hundred of their users have minimum use, you will end up paying eight to ten thousand dollars in just a month. This is very, very, very high. Not many clients prefer paying a premium price for just a little data. Both of the solutions need to be very cost-effective. I have found many clients struggle the moment they hear the cost aspect of the solution. If you have millions of data, then you will need to spend millions of dollars just for the hosting and clusters of the Kubernetes services. This is the reason why many people are not preferring the solution.
Minikube is one small Kubernetes cluster. With minikube, we can install this on our local laptop and we can practice. So to know Kubernetes, we have a concept of minikube which can be installed on a local laptop and we can practice Kubernetes commands. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) an eight.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services,...
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a stable and reliable platform for resolving enterprise problems. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) works. That said, it is not my preferred solution for running containers in the cloud. I would strongly prefer to use Amazon for critical workloads due to better documentation and support. I'd rate the solution five out of ten.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) can be easily integrated with other tools of the Azure environment. For our company projects where the solution is being used, I have onboarded them at a later stage, but rarely have I had to seek help from the support team. Documentations for the product are easily available. I would overall rate Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) a nine out of ten. I would definitely recommend the product to other users. For enterprise projects, where the clients have a heavy budget, Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) can be adopted without any doubt.
Azure Kubernetes Service is a good solution for any organisation wanting to opt for containerization. AI can be integrated with the application. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) streamlines container deployment and management through our Jenkins pipelines. The continuous integration and deployment process involves fetching the code from Git, building it, containerizing it with Docker, and then deploying it. The scalability features have the most positive impact on our operations. As we experience a substantial increase in the number of users and the traffic to our applications grows yearly, it efficiently handles the heavy workload and concurrent transactions. Its managed services streamline scalability without the need for extensive capacity planning compared to a self-managed Kubernetes environment. This approach enhances operational efficiency and aligns with similar offerings in other cloud platforms, making managed services a preferred choice for many organizations. It is a highly reliable and secure product. I rate it an eight out of ten.
Every container and elastic service on each of the clouds is very similar. Still, Azure offers an increased layer of security based on many permissions that can be handled through Active Directory. Security-wise, Azure is the better cloud and solves many of the inherent security issues that Kubernetes had originally. From there, I feel permission management is much better. The UI is simpler to understand. I rate Azure Kubernetes Service a seven out of ten. It could be better, but it does its job very well.
It really depends upon the usage. If they really have the use case to go cloud, they can use it, but still, it is more applicable for people who want to get into software engineering and web development. Especially in the financial domain or e-commerce, where you would be relying on websites. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
I rate Azure Kubernetes Service an eight out of ten. It is expensive to scale the number of nodes.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Azure Kubernetes Service is my go-to and preferred platform over Amazon and Google. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Nothing in Azure is as easy as plug-and-play. Most of the time, the product is cloud-based. There are on-premise solutions for very specific cases. As a representative of cybersecurity operations, I have to do research and read the manuals. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
My advice to others is to be aware of the in-depth setup. I rate AKS an eight out of ten. In general, building services within this solution can be complex and demanding, particularly in terms of the investment required for DevOps and SecOps. If your team lacks extensive technical expertise, it might be challenging to start directly with Kubernetes. However, if you have individuals with sufficient internet skills, you can leverage the scalability and simplicity offered by Kubernetes. Here, simplicity refers to the consistent experience compared to migrating from on-premise to the cloud. Nonetheless, the investment in pre-existing knowledge, appropriate SKUs, and skilled personnel is crucial. Applying Kubernetes is still not a straightforward task and requires careful consideration.
My advice for others is to focus more on packaging the individual models and cables before going to where the solution is situated. I rate AKS a six out of ten.
I rate the solution as a ten.
We are using the latest version. If you plan to use this solution, you have to be good at troubleshooting, and you need to understand containerization really well. You need to know how to debug and understand other Azure products as well as Kubernetes. This is not for non-technical users. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
I give the solution a nine out of ten. Maintenance is much easier than an on-prem/self-hosted Kubernetes platform. Many of the tasks are automated by the cloud provider.
I would give the solution a nine out of ten since it is good. However, I would only recommend AKS to billion-dollar businesses that don’t mind spending. It is more for data storage, blockchain-related services, etc which offers very limited opportunities. So, I wouldn’t recommend it. There are multiple other ways to do it and improvise your profits rather than spending on those services. AWS and Azure are cloud services. They are also known as enterprise serverless architecture. Previously, we used to have server rooms where we used to deploy on-premises. Since the inception of AWS and Azure, they want you to deploy all the data onto their cloud. They offer microservices to facilitate interaction in the cloud. That is where they make money. We did the deployment for a production-based project. AWS has its own powerful Kubernetes. However, the cost of Azure was higher than Kubernetes at that time. But, there was something additional called Azure deployments. If you have your own product and want to deploy it into multiple client-related places or on-prem solutions, you need to download it as a blueprint and then upload it onto one more system, which is one great thing about Azure that Amazon does not provide. Kubernetes services, also known as elastic services, come with more clusters and is also very expensive. Suppose, your product needs to be used by just four organizations and a couple of hundred of their users have minimum use, you will end up paying eight to ten thousand dollars in just a month. This is very, very, very high. Not many clients prefer paying a premium price for just a little data. Both of the solutions need to be very cost-effective. I have found many clients struggle the moment they hear the cost aspect of the solution. If you have millions of data, then you will need to spend millions of dollars just for the hosting and clusters of the Kubernetes services. This is the reason why many people are not preferring the solution.
We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Minikube is one small Kubernetes cluster. With minikube, we can install this on our local laptop and we can practice. So to know Kubernetes, we have a concept of minikube which can be installed on a local laptop and we can practice Kubernetes commands. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) an eight.
I would rate Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) an eight out of ten.
I rate this solution an eight out of ten. I recommend the solution because other cloud solutions are delayed compared to this.