Report-wise, everything is good. However, the execution time is slightly higher compared to other tools. Everything is consistent regarding recording, and I haven't encountered any bugs. However, the execution time is inconsistent. Sometimes, when I run the same script at different times, it takes longer to execute. Overall, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.
Around 1,500 technical staff are needed for the solution’s deployment and maintenance. We mainly use BlazeMeter for performance testing and to generate the load from multiple locations. The automation and manual testing teams can also use the same tool for their automation testing or manual testing. So, BlazeMeter could be a single platform for multiple teams. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. For me, it's a good product. It's a good tool for automation testing and performance testing, especially if you're looking for a high-performing, highly scalable, and cost-effective solution.
Senior Manager at 360logica Software Testing Services
Real User
Top 20
2024-02-21T16:11:23Z
Feb 21, 2024
BlazeMeter meets our needs well. It performs admirably for our purposes. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend using this solution to other users.
Multiple people can focus on the same instance. If anyone wants to view the result, So it's quite easy. You don't need to share the GTL file. You can access the browser. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Currently, I am looking out for Java Applet and Oracle applications. I want something that will support the load testing phase for the tools that Java Applet and Oracle support. I rate the overall tool between six and seven out of ten.
I would recommend giving BlazeMeter a try because they offer competitive pricing, and you can negotiate for discounts. BlazeMeter is more affordable than other products on the market but uses emulators instead of actual devices, which might be acceptable depending on your testing needs and budget.Additionally, it allows you to carry over unused virtual users to the next subscription, which can accumulate and save you money. Overall, I would rate BlazeMeter as an eight out of ten.
BlazeMeter is a tool that is easy to use. Interface and report generation capabilities make the tool very handy for its users. The only tricky area in the solution is running BlazeMeter on JMeter, an open-source tool making it a very complex part for me. There are different technical stacks in the market in which one needs to invest. After the testing phase, one may go for an expensive product in the market. Once there is a stable product in the market and the company can generate revenue, then it is feasible to go for the paid version, which is an option available in JMeter, so I can recommend it to others. BlazeMeter's paid version can be a bit expensive compared to JMeter. I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.
Senior Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2022-09-18T21:05:00Z
Sep 18, 2022
I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10. I would recommend this solution for those who want to use it, but it depends on the need. My advice is that you can start using the tool immediately. There's no need to do POCs. The intention of this tool is that people should uncover more and more in their testing. That means people should be doing more testing in an automated fashion, or they should just give a command to BlazeMeter, and it should execute test cases and give them some insight into whether something is wrong. We want people to do more automation testing and move away from manual testing. That is the success criteria. That means that we are spending more on BlazeMeter, but that's a sign that we're doing more automation. Our operational expenditure isn't increasing because we still have a team to manage the BlazeMeter account and the on-premises setup. Our intention isn't to save time. The ultimate goal is to increase the velocity and improve quality, which will happen if we uncover more defects early.
My advice would be not to look only at the price as the only point of decision. Evaluate if the tool is a good fit with your business and challenges. We are using the SaaS solution. For companies that want to start, it's a better approach because it's easy to use: Pay and go. Of course, in large accounts, we are facing companies that are looking not only for cloud and private cloud, but for hybrid solutions where it is installed on-premises and in the cloud. BlazeMeter is up to this kind of challenge. Adoption is a challenge that we face with every new tool or process. Because BlazeMeter is easy to use, we can adopt it faster. For developers and Agile teams, it's very helpful when we can use something quickly. That has helped a lot in the adoption. The level of maintenance is okay. It is nothing that would create barriers for us. We have a team of eight people involved in the solution, and their roles include administration and performance testing. Blazemeter is one of the top-three that I have found. It doesn't have any negative points compared to others.
Service Virtualization Developer at Tata Consultancy Services
Real User
2022-07-24T23:48:00Z
Jul 24, 2022
We were using the functional testing for APIs, but it has been disabled in our organization. I asked what was the purpose of disabling it and they said it was to make sure that everyone is using the API monitoring. Although we requested that they enable it again for our purposes, so far we haven't had much chance to explore the API functional testing. Overall, I would rate the solution at seven out of 10 because I have sent some requirements for API monitoring and performance testing on Mock Services separately, to separate teams; things that should be introduced into BlazeMeter. Until those things are available, I am not able to use some of the components
Mobile Network Automation Architect at BT - British Telecom
MSP
2022-07-17T17:19:00Z
Jul 17, 2022
I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. We try to avoid scripting. We use the scriptless testing functionality about 95% of the time. With JMeter, you don't need a lot of scripting. I don't need to know a lot of automation or programming at this stage to use it. We haven't faced any challenges in getting multiple teams to adopt BlazeMeter. I created a sandbox for my own team where they can experiment. People really wanted access to it, so I added more and more people, and the designers are now part of it. For others who are evaluating this solution, my advice is to do the BlazeMeter University course first before you start to use the product. It will give you a general understanding of what it is. It only takes half an hour to an hour. You don't always need to finish the course or pass the exam, but doing the course itself will definitely help. They have a JMeter basic and advanced course and a Taurus framework course. They have an API monitoring course, which will help for Runscope, and one for mocks. Most of the courses are quick videos explaining what the product does and how it works. At that stage, you can go back and build your first automation test case on JMeter or Runscope. It's brilliant.
I rate BlazeMeter nine out of ten. There's still some room to grow, but it's a pretty solid product. If you're comparing this to other tools and you're thinking about using BlazeMeter for functional testing, take a look at the action groups, object library, and test data generation features. Those three things make your day-to-day work a lot easier. It simplifies creating and maintaining your tests.
BlazeMeter should release frequently updated demo versions of the solution to the market. They can let the internet community test it, such as crowdsourced testing, this would be good for them in the market. I would recommend this solution to others if they have a small budget and do not have the option to buy another solution. Otherwise, Tricentis NeoLoad and Micro Focus LoadRunner are the best. I rate BlazeMeter a four out of ten.
We are just customers and end-users. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're pretty happy with its capabilities in general. I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
We're a customer and an end-user. I'd advise a company considers multiple technologies to support its goals. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
I would rate it a seven out of ten. I would recommend it. I would like for it to be Windo-based. It should have the ability to be implemented into Windows applications.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered...
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Report-wise, everything is good. However, the execution time is slightly higher compared to other tools. Everything is consistent regarding recording, and I haven't encountered any bugs. However, the execution time is inconsistent. Sometimes, when I run the same script at different times, it takes longer to execute. Overall, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.
Around 1,500 technical staff are needed for the solution’s deployment and maintenance. We mainly use BlazeMeter for performance testing and to generate the load from multiple locations. The automation and manual testing teams can also use the same tool for their automation testing or manual testing. So, BlazeMeter could be a single platform for multiple teams. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I recommend BlazeMeter for its ease of setup and integration into continuous testing pipelines. I rate it a nine out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. For me, it's a good product. It's a good tool for automation testing and performance testing, especially if you're looking for a high-performing, highly scalable, and cost-effective solution.
Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
BlazeMeter meets our needs well. It performs admirably for our purposes. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend using this solution to other users.
I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
Multiple people can focus on the same instance. If anyone wants to view the result, So it's quite easy. You don't need to share the GTL file. You can access the browser. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Currently, I am looking out for Java Applet and Oracle applications. I want something that will support the load testing phase for the tools that Java Applet and Oracle support. I rate the overall tool between six and seven out of ten.
Maintenance-wise, the product is fine. Based on my initial perception and initial experiences, I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
I would recommend giving BlazeMeter a try because they offer competitive pricing, and you can negotiate for discounts. BlazeMeter is more affordable than other products on the market but uses emulators instead of actual devices, which might be acceptable depending on your testing needs and budget.Additionally, it allows you to carry over unused virtual users to the next subscription, which can accumulate and save you money. Overall, I would rate BlazeMeter as an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate BlazeMeter as an eight out of ten.
BlazeMeter is a tool that is easy to use. Interface and report generation capabilities make the tool very handy for its users. The only tricky area in the solution is running BlazeMeter on JMeter, an open-source tool making it a very complex part for me. There are different technical stacks in the market in which one needs to invest. After the testing phase, one may go for an expensive product in the market. Once there is a stable product in the market and the company can generate revenue, then it is feasible to go for the paid version, which is an option available in JMeter, so I can recommend it to others. BlazeMeter's paid version can be a bit expensive compared to JMeter. I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.
I rate BlazeMeter an eight out of ten.
I would rate this solution a 10 out of 10. I would recommend this solution for those who want to use it, but it depends on the need. My advice is that you can start using the tool immediately. There's no need to do POCs. The intention of this tool is that people should uncover more and more in their testing. That means people should be doing more testing in an automated fashion, or they should just give a command to BlazeMeter, and it should execute test cases and give them some insight into whether something is wrong. We want people to do more automation testing and move away from manual testing. That is the success criteria. That means that we are spending more on BlazeMeter, but that's a sign that we're doing more automation. Our operational expenditure isn't increasing because we still have a team to manage the BlazeMeter account and the on-premises setup. Our intention isn't to save time. The ultimate goal is to increase the velocity and improve quality, which will happen if we uncover more defects early.
My advice would be not to look only at the price as the only point of decision. Evaluate if the tool is a good fit with your business and challenges. We are using the SaaS solution. For companies that want to start, it's a better approach because it's easy to use: Pay and go. Of course, in large accounts, we are facing companies that are looking not only for cloud and private cloud, but for hybrid solutions where it is installed on-premises and in the cloud. BlazeMeter is up to this kind of challenge. Adoption is a challenge that we face with every new tool or process. Because BlazeMeter is easy to use, we can adopt it faster. For developers and Agile teams, it's very helpful when we can use something quickly. That has helped a lot in the adoption. The level of maintenance is okay. It is nothing that would create barriers for us. We have a team of eight people involved in the solution, and their roles include administration and performance testing. Blazemeter is one of the top-three that I have found. It doesn't have any negative points compared to others.
We were using the functional testing for APIs, but it has been disabled in our organization. I asked what was the purpose of disabling it and they said it was to make sure that everyone is using the API monitoring. Although we requested that they enable it again for our purposes, so far we haven't had much chance to explore the API functional testing. Overall, I would rate the solution at seven out of 10 because I have sent some requirements for API monitoring and performance testing on Mock Services separately, to separate teams; things that should be introduced into BlazeMeter. Until those things are available, I am not able to use some of the components
I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. We try to avoid scripting. We use the scriptless testing functionality about 95% of the time. With JMeter, you don't need a lot of scripting. I don't need to know a lot of automation or programming at this stage to use it. We haven't faced any challenges in getting multiple teams to adopt BlazeMeter. I created a sandbox for my own team where they can experiment. People really wanted access to it, so I added more and more people, and the designers are now part of it. For others who are evaluating this solution, my advice is to do the BlazeMeter University course first before you start to use the product. It will give you a general understanding of what it is. It only takes half an hour to an hour. You don't always need to finish the course or pass the exam, but doing the course itself will definitely help. They have a JMeter basic and advanced course and a Taurus framework course. They have an API monitoring course, which will help for Runscope, and one for mocks. Most of the courses are quick videos explaining what the product does and how it works. At that stage, you can go back and build your first automation test case on JMeter or Runscope. It's brilliant.
I rate BlazeMeter nine out of ten. There's still some room to grow, but it's a pretty solid product. If you're comparing this to other tools and you're thinking about using BlazeMeter for functional testing, take a look at the action groups, object library, and test data generation features. Those three things make your day-to-day work a lot easier. It simplifies creating and maintaining your tests.
BlazeMeter should release frequently updated demo versions of the solution to the market. They can let the internet community test it, such as crowdsourced testing, this would be good for them in the market. I would recommend this solution to others if they have a small budget and do not have the option to buy another solution. Otherwise, Tricentis NeoLoad and Micro Focus LoadRunner are the best. I rate BlazeMeter a four out of ten.
I recommend BlazeMeter because of the accuracy of the results. I rate the solution eight out of 10.
We are just customers and end-users. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We're pretty happy with its capabilities in general. I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations.
We're a customer and an end-user. I'd advise a company considers multiple technologies to support its goals. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate it a seven out of ten. I would recommend it. I would like for it to be Windo-based. It should have the ability to be implemented into Windows applications.
Excellent product!