We approve and even suggest the product to the people who are doing security testing because this product is far more easy to use. I would rate Codenomicon with an 8 to 9 out of ten. Unless these tests are passed, we will not go live internationally.
Senior Lead Engineer - Product Security at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Jul 30, 2018
It depends on your company's needs. Codenomicon will only help to identify protocol implementation issues. If a company is using a standard stack, which is already tested, then I don't think they will hit any issues while doing fuzzy. The tool is used only for the protocol implementation, done by the company itself. I would rate Codenomicon at seven out of 10. It does not support the complete protocol stack. There are some IoT protocols that are not supported and new protocols that are not supported.
Find out what your peers are saying about Defensics Protocol Fuzzing vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
Find out in this report how the two Fuzz Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
We approve and even suggest the product to the people who are doing security testing because this product is far more easy to use. I would rate Codenomicon with an 8 to 9 out of ten. Unless these tests are passed, we will not go live internationally.
It depends on your company's needs. Codenomicon will only help to identify protocol implementation issues. If a company is using a standard stack, which is already tested, then I don't think they will hit any issues while doing fuzzy. The tool is used only for the protocol implementation, done by the company itself. I would rate Codenomicon at seven out of 10. It does not support the complete protocol stack. There are some IoT protocols that are not supported and new protocols that are not supported.