The coding experience because of GitHub integration is going to be largely the same because GitHub is a standardized platform. All the developers know they like it, and that's why it's popular. They wanted the enterprise to have an offering that integrates with user accounts with Active Directory. If they onboard a developer as a contractor or just from a vendor perspective or somebody internal, and if that person leaves, code doesn't leave with them. They're not taking it on their own GitHub subscription and then uploading it. It also gives us the extra security of controlling the code that we own. The setup has nothing to do with the GitHub function in and of itself. It's integrating it with identity providers, in Active Directory, and single sign-on and multifactor authentication. Those were some challenges, but the GitHub experience is good. It's just a matter of locking down the subscription and deployment according to the security group requirements. Codespaces handles large projects or high-complexity applications very well. It hasn't gone live yet, so I can't vouch for that in this organization. Based on what I know of the structure of it, it's top-notch. Based on what I've seen in the setup, it seems like GitHub is able to handle complex projects and large deployments. The solution is deployed in the cloud. The solution's infrastructure's maintained by GitHub, and we just maintain the repository. I would recommend Codespaces to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate Codespaces an eight out of ten. You should have a higher knowledge of the project you are working on. You should only depend on it partially, as it produces inaccurate results. It is still in a phase of constantly being tested, trained, and improved.
An IDE, or Integrated Development Environment, is a software application that provides comprehensive tools and features to facilitate software development.
The coding experience because of GitHub integration is going to be largely the same because GitHub is a standardized platform. All the developers know they like it, and that's why it's popular. They wanted the enterprise to have an offering that integrates with user accounts with Active Directory. If they onboard a developer as a contractor or just from a vendor perspective or somebody internal, and if that person leaves, code doesn't leave with them. They're not taking it on their own GitHub subscription and then uploading it. It also gives us the extra security of controlling the code that we own. The setup has nothing to do with the GitHub function in and of itself. It's integrating it with identity providers, in Active Directory, and single sign-on and multifactor authentication. Those were some challenges, but the GitHub experience is good. It's just a matter of locking down the subscription and deployment according to the security group requirements. Codespaces handles large projects or high-complexity applications very well. It hasn't gone live yet, so I can't vouch for that in this organization. Based on what I know of the structure of it, it's top-notch. Based on what I've seen in the setup, it seems like GitHub is able to handle complex projects and large deployments. The solution is deployed in the cloud. The solution's infrastructure's maintained by GitHub, and we just maintain the repository. I would recommend Codespaces to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate Codespaces a nine out of ten.
I rate Codespaces an eight out of ten. You should have a higher knowledge of the project you are working on. You should only depend on it partially, as it produces inaccurate results. It is still in a phase of constantly being tested, trained, and improved.