I would rate Dell RecoverPoint a seven out of ten. Currently, I am not sure if I would recommend Dell RecoverPoint to others as we are only using it for a small portion of our VMs, while the bulk is managed by Site Recovery Manager. Once we fully operationalize it, we might be in a better position to recommend it.
Senior Manager- II | Unit Head - Technolgy Infra (Global) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2024-04-11T07:34:45Z
Apr 11, 2024
First, consider the criticality of your data. If you're a bank where you can't afford to lose any transactions, RecoverPoint is a great option. If you have a good budget, it's worth considering. Another excellent product is Zerto, which offers similar functionality. If you have a smaller budget, then Veeam replication is also an option. So, there are three options I've used, and the best choice depends on your company's specific needs. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. The main reason I recommend it is the ability to restore data from previous points in time. Also, RecoverPoint is designed to integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage. If you don't have Dell EMC storage, you can't use it with other brands like IBM or HP. If you do have Dell EMC, it works well. Another good EMC product is SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility); I haven't worked with it directly, but it's worth considering.
Due to its outdated status, it's important to note that can only verify the pre-implementation scenario and deployment details. It's crucial to involve technical experts in the initial kick-off meeting for implementation because the process can be quite time-consuming. The system faced some initial challenges and took approximately seventeen days to become fully operational, causing some overall disappointment. It has been functioning exceptionally well since it was deployed. I would rate it eight out of ten.
Senior Infrastructure Solutions Architect at Benya systems
Real User
2022-08-11T15:31:53Z
Aug 11, 2022
RecoverPoint can be depended on as your only disaster recovery solution without any need to mix different types of failover systems. I would rate RecoverPoint as nine out of ten.
I rate RecoverPoint nine out of 10. My advice to future users is to pay for a full support contract with the vendor because you cannot implement it alone. And the RecoverPoint setup is a one-time thing, but if a problem happens, you also need to take care of the critical points. This is what you should take care of on your own. And, of course, the management of RecoverPoint needs to be transferred over. It needs to change from Flashware to stream modify.
Senior Systems Engineer at a marketing services firm with 1-10 employees
Real User
2021-11-03T15:41:21Z
Nov 3, 2021
I handle the installation and support of the product for clients. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. I'm pretty happy with it. It's a good solution.
Customer Service Engineer, System engineer at Computer Services Ltd.
MSP
2020-04-01T07:25:00Z
Apr 1, 2020
I would rate it a ten out of ten. It could use an external application on top of its recover points. Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution.
I would recommend the product. It's good, especially for those who want to do replication and don't have a lot of money. It's a very good product and it uses very little bandwidth. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
Technical Team Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Consultant
2017-04-24T06:20:00Z
Apr 24, 2017
RecoverPoint acts on a block level and it needs an EMC Splitter to work. If your storage arrays are not EMC, then you need to virtualize your storage via VPLEX before acquiring RecoverPoint.
Dell RecoverPoint provides continuous data protection with multiple recovery points to restore applications instantly to a specific point in time. It is used to protect applications with bidirectional synchronous and asynchronous replication and digital video recorder (DVR)-like recovery in physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures.
I would rate Dell RecoverPoint a seven out of ten. Currently, I am not sure if I would recommend Dell RecoverPoint to others as we are only using it for a small portion of our VMs, while the bulk is managed by Site Recovery Manager. Once we fully operationalize it, we might be in a better position to recommend it.
First, consider the criticality of your data. If you're a bank where you can't afford to lose any transactions, RecoverPoint is a great option. If you have a good budget, it's worth considering. Another excellent product is Zerto, which offers similar functionality. If you have a smaller budget, then Veeam replication is also an option. So, there are three options I've used, and the best choice depends on your company's specific needs. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. The main reason I recommend it is the ability to restore data from previous points in time. Also, RecoverPoint is designed to integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage. If you don't have Dell EMC storage, you can't use it with other brands like IBM or HP. If you do have Dell EMC, it works well. Another good EMC product is SRDF (Symmetrix Remote Data Facility); I haven't worked with it directly, but it's worth considering.
We have mostly virtual appliances. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I rate Dell RecoverPoint a nine out of ten.
Due to its outdated status, it's important to note that can only verify the pre-implementation scenario and deployment details. It's crucial to involve technical experts in the initial kick-off meeting for implementation because the process can be quite time-consuming. The system faced some initial challenges and took approximately seventeen days to become fully operational, causing some overall disappointment. It has been functioning exceptionally well since it was deployed. I would rate it eight out of ten.
Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.
Overall, I would rate Dell RecoverPoint a 10 out of 10.
RecoverPoint can be depended on as your only disaster recovery solution without any need to mix different types of failover systems. I would rate RecoverPoint as nine out of ten.
I rate RecoverPoint nine out of 10. My advice to future users is to pay for a full support contract with the vendor because you cannot implement it alone. And the RecoverPoint setup is a one-time thing, but if a problem happens, you also need to take care of the critical points. This is what you should take care of on your own. And, of course, the management of RecoverPoint needs to be transferred over. It needs to change from Flashware to stream modify.
I handle the installation and support of the product for clients. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. I'm pretty happy with it. It's a good solution.
I would rate it a ten out of ten. It could use an external application on top of its recover points. Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution.
I would recommend the product. It's good, especially for those who want to do replication and don't have a lot of money. It's a very good product and it uses very little bandwidth. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
RecoverPoint acts on a block level and it needs an EMC Splitter to work. If your storage arrays are not EMC, then you need to virtualize your storage via VPLEX before acquiring RecoverPoint.