I rate DX SaaS seven out of 10. I have worked on DX APM for many years, and they are lagging behind the leading APM products. Many of the features readily available in other products are not there. At the same time, I am not saying it's a bad product. Every solution has its pain points. By that same token, I can't say Dynatrace is without issues. Unless you spend time working hands-on with a product, everything is theoretical.
Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
MSP
Top 5
2020-06-08T06:11:07Z
Jun 8, 2020
I think anyone wanting to implement this solution needs to know about the complexity. I think the most important thing is the AI that comes with the update. For a large and complex environment, it's important to be careful with the architecture and the AI capability, because lots of data can be gathered from CA, but in terms of informing those data, or using the data for a more meaningful result can be quite cumbersome for CA, for a standardized environment, which doesn't have any complex environments. I think this solution is quite good and I would rate it a six out of 10.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Dynatrace, Zabbix and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: October 2024.
I give DX SaaS a seven out of ten. I would suggest using DX SaaS for any organization that can fulfill its requirements with this solution.
I rate DX SaaS seven out of 10. I have worked on DX APM for many years, and they are lagging behind the leading APM products. Many of the features readily available in other products are not there. At the same time, I am not saying it's a bad product. Every solution has its pain points. By that same token, I can't say Dynatrace is without issues. Unless you spend time working hands-on with a product, everything is theoretical.
I think anyone wanting to implement this solution needs to know about the complexity. I think the most important thing is the AI that comes with the update. For a large and complex environment, it's important to be careful with the architecture and the AI capability, because lots of data can be gathered from CA, but in terms of informing those data, or using the data for a more meaningful result can be quite cumbersome for CA, for a standardized environment, which doesn't have any complex environments. I think this solution is quite good and I would rate it a six out of 10.