IT Security Specialist at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-09-10T08:34:02Z
Sep 10, 2024
I love the product. Technically, it's one of the best, but not the best. I like it. It's very easy for me to control. There are a few things that seem a bit problematic. First is the two-factor authentication. If I want to use BIG-IP Access Policy Manager instead of NetScaler, it's not as good for ease of use and working with multifactor. With NetScaler, we can add the authenticator code directly to the Active Directory. In F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, you can't do this. You need to use an iRule or an external management system, which I don't like. This is a real drawback for everyone using F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. Regarding the WAF, it's the best.
Associate Network Engineer at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
2024-03-18T15:23:50Z
Mar 18, 2024
I can't recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) as a one-size-fits-all solution. It has several functions, so the best fit depends on the specific need. However, a major benefit is the ability to use a single license for multiple technologies – VPN, load balancing, etc. This can be a significant advantage. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. In my opinion, it is the best solution.
It's a really scalable solution, stable solution, one of the best products in the market in that segment, widely used as well as a lot of good support documentation online and call support available. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Technical Staff at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-12-01T12:02:43Z
Dec 1, 2023
People who want to implement the product must ask for a POC and see if it fits their network needs. F5 is more than happy to provide a POC with a partner. We can check if everything is okay and decide whether they must buy the solution. My customers are fine with the functionalities that F5 provides. Overall, I rate the solution an eight and a half out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
The advice I would give to others looking to implement F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is this: do your homework on it to make sure it's going to definitely fit your use case. On a scale of one to 10, I would give F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager an eight overall.
Our company didn't use F5 ourselves, however, we sell F5 products. We're resellers. Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. I'd recommend this solution to other users and companies.
Presale Engineer at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-09-23T06:09:55Z
Sep 23, 2020
The F5 Access Policy Manager is something that I have experience with and I am happy with it. This is a product that I can recommend for others. At this point, we don't have requirements beyond what this product provides, so I cannot think of any additional features that it needs. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Cyber Security Solution Architect at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-08-19T07:57:00Z
Aug 19, 2020
Due to a bug issue, some customers felt they needed to upgrade to protect themselves from hackers. Thankfully, our security vendors advised us on this issue. They told us the risks and spent a few days updating our software. For this reason, they are a vendor I can trust. Honesty is important because there are a lot of allocation websites, personal information, and data at stake. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give F5 Access Policy Manager a rating of nine.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) is an access management proxy solution for managing global access to the enterprise networks, cloud providers, applications, and application programming interfaces (APIs). Through a single management interface, BIG-IP APM consolidates remote, mobile, network, virtual, and web access.
BIG-IP APM can also serve as a bridge between modern and classic authentication and authorization protocols and methods. For applications which are unable to support...
I love the product. Technically, it's one of the best, but not the best. I like it. It's very easy for me to control. There are a few things that seem a bit problematic. First is the two-factor authentication. If I want to use BIG-IP Access Policy Manager instead of NetScaler, it's not as good for ease of use and working with multifactor. With NetScaler, we can add the authenticator code directly to the Active Directory. In F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, you can't do this. You need to use an iRule or an external management system, which I don't like. This is a real drawback for everyone using F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager. Regarding the WAF, it's the best.
I can't recommend F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) as a one-size-fits-all solution. It has several functions, so the best fit depends on the specific need. However, a major benefit is the ability to use a single license for multiple technologies – VPN, load balancing, etc. This can be a significant advantage. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. In my opinion, it is the best solution.
It's a really scalable solution, stable solution, one of the best products in the market in that segment, widely used as well as a lot of good support documentation online and call support available. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We have moved to microservices. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.
People who want to implement the product must ask for a POC and see if it fits their network needs. F5 is more than happy to provide a POC with a partner. We can check if everything is okay and decide whether they must buy the solution. My customers are fine with the functionalities that F5 provides. Overall, I rate the solution an eight and a half out of ten.
I rate F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) a ten out of ten.
We have specific cookies with stickiness. The product should not be used for WAF. Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten, and I recommend it. The solution is good, but its functionality start offering can be improved.
I rate F5 BIG-IP APM a seven out of ten.
I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.
The advice I would give to others looking to implement F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager is this: do your homework on it to make sure it's going to definitely fit your use case. On a scale of one to 10, I would give F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager an eight overall.
Our company didn't use F5 ourselves, however, we sell F5 products. We're resellers. Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. I'd recommend this solution to other users and companies.
The F5 Access Policy Manager is something that I have experience with and I am happy with it. This is a product that I can recommend for others. At this point, we don't have requirements beyond what this product provides, so I cannot think of any additional features that it needs. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Due to a bug issue, some customers felt they needed to upgrade to protect themselves from hackers. Thankfully, our security vendors advised us on this issue. They told us the risks and spent a few days updating our software. For this reason, they are a vendor I can trust. Honesty is important because there are a lot of allocation websites, personal information, and data at stake. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give F5 Access Policy Manager a rating of nine.