I would recommend Harness as it's better than uDeploy in terms of ease of use and functionality. It supports multiple pipelines, multiple environments, different service configurations, and has a user-friendly dashboard. I's rate the solution eight out of ten.
I recommend Harness to other users. As part of the engineering team, my role includes certifying products for applications, and Harness has proven suitable for our needs. I suggest adopting it based on usage requirements. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Engineering Technical Leader - SRE (Cloud/Kubernetes-Security) at Cisco
Real User
Top 10
2024-04-05T11:42:52Z
Apr 5, 2024
The pricing aspect needs to be considered first based on your requirements. Secondly, it might be suitable if your team is technically proficient in tools like Argo CD. However, if you have a complex infrastructure and limited personnel to manage it, Harness would be a better choice. We integrated Harness with Kubernetes, and the setup didn't significantly affect our existing infrastructure. Learning to use Harness for basic tasks is relatively easy, but mastering complex operations may require time and team support. I rate it a seven out of ten.
Build Automation tools streamline software development by automating tasks like code compilation and testing. They enhance efficiency, reduce manual errors, and improve project management, playing an integral role in modern development environments.Build Automation increases productivity by allowing developers to focus on coding rather than repetitive tasks. It integrates with CI/CD pipelines and supports multiple programming languages, providing a robust infrastructure for software...
I would recommend Harness as it's better than uDeploy in terms of ease of use and functionality. It supports multiple pipelines, multiple environments, different service configurations, and has a user-friendly dashboard. I's rate the solution eight out of ten.
I recommend Harness to other users. As part of the engineering team, my role includes certifying products for applications, and Harness has proven suitable for our needs. I suggest adopting it based on usage requirements. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
The pricing aspect needs to be considered first based on your requirements. Secondly, it might be suitable if your team is technically proficient in tools like Argo CD. However, if you have a complex infrastructure and limited personnel to manage it, Harness would be a better choice. We integrated Harness with Kubernetes, and the setup didn't significantly affect our existing infrastructure. Learning to use Harness for basic tasks is relatively easy, but mastering complex operations may require time and team support. I rate it a seven out of ten.