BAW, we didn't use BAW. We use Case Manager. We can use Case Manager, but we are moving towards BAW. That's why we are interested to compare BAW and SAP OpenText. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
I'm not a user. I'm a consultant. My company is a partner with IBM. I'm not in the latest version. The version I use depends on the customer's version. Not all customers are in the last upgraded version. I'd recommend the solution to others. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
We're an IBM partner. We use a few different versions of the solution, including 5.1, the narrow version, and 5.5.6, the highest version. Whether this solution makes sense depends on a customer's needs. If the customer wants to implement some business processes that involve many documents and collaboration spaces, and that includes some business processes where many people are involved, Case Foundation is a very good solution for them. I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten. The product is very, very reliable, and very stable - especially the content manager part of the FileNet. It was very easy to build some business processes in the BPM model of FileNet. However, we'd like to see improvements in the user interface and improvements to the IBM content navigator part of the solution.
ECM BPM Senior Team Leader at a marketing services firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-09-27T04:10:02Z
Sep 27, 2020
My advice for anybody who is implementing Case Foundation is to keep the design as simple as possible because the workflows are very static. If you try to change it a lot, you will make it very complex and you will have problems. You should use and maintain business rules outside of the main workflow because if you have some rule that changes then the workflow stays the same, most of the time. Overall, this is a good product. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
IBM Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2019-12-05T11:14:00Z
Dec 5, 2019
We use the on-premises deployment model. In the past, I've developed solutions based on Case Foundation. We're partners with IBM. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Business Solution Architect at a tech services company
Real User
2019-10-30T06:14:00Z
Oct 30, 2019
We use the on-premises deployment model. We're an IBM partner. We have about six projects ongoing in which we are implementing the solution for clients. As this solution is being phased out, I'd advise others to go with something newer. Also, be sure you do a proper design study before implementing a solution. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. In terms of rolling out deployments, it's good and there aren't really any bugs. However, it has a general lack of features.
IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric...
BAW, we didn't use BAW. We use Case Manager. We can use Case Manager, but we are moving towards BAW. That's why we are interested to compare BAW and SAP OpenText. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
I rate IBM Case Foundation eight out of 10.
I'm not a user. I'm a consultant. My company is a partner with IBM. I'm not in the latest version. The version I use depends on the customer's version. Not all customers are in the last upgraded version. I'd recommend the solution to others. I would rate the solution eight out of ten.
We're an IBM partner. We use a few different versions of the solution, including 5.1, the narrow version, and 5.5.6, the highest version. Whether this solution makes sense depends on a customer's needs. If the customer wants to implement some business processes that involve many documents and collaboration spaces, and that includes some business processes where many people are involved, Case Foundation is a very good solution for them. I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten. The product is very, very reliable, and very stable - especially the content manager part of the FileNet. It was very easy to build some business processes in the BPM model of FileNet. However, we'd like to see improvements in the user interface and improvements to the IBM content navigator part of the solution.
I would definitely recommend this solution. On a scale from one to ten, I would give IBM Case Foundation a rating of eight.
. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
My advice for anybody who is implementing Case Foundation is to keep the design as simple as possible because the workflows are very static. If you try to change it a lot, you will make it very complex and you will have problems. You should use and maintain business rules outside of the main workflow because if you have some rule that changes then the workflow stays the same, most of the time. Overall, this is a good product. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
It's a very good solution. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.
We use the on-premises deployment model. In the past, I've developed solutions based on Case Foundation. We're partners with IBM. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
We use the on-premises deployment model. We're an IBM partner. We have about six projects ongoing in which we are implementing the solution for clients. As this solution is being phased out, I'd advise others to go with something newer. Also, be sure you do a proper design study before implementing a solution. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. In terms of rolling out deployments, it's good and there aren't really any bugs. However, it has a general lack of features.