Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada
Real User
Top 20
2023-05-18T19:19:00Z
May 18, 2023
I think it's a good and enterprising one. It's good for some people, and some say it is expensive. But for me, I have to say I don't consider finance because that's not my level, but from a usability perspective, I think it is good.
Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada
Real User
Top 20
2022-08-30T16:05:00Z
Aug 30, 2022
We haven't used the full functionality of the solution yet. We have only used the tracking for a couple of the applications. We haven't used it widely. We are expecting to upgrade the solution and we may use it more after upgrading. I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.
Software Engineering Director at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-04-13T06:27:00Z
Apr 13, 2020
Consider the introduction of the tool in terms of the proper education of the teams who will adapt it. I think any introduction of such a tool requires proper training. It's not so intuitive that people can trust it. If you just give it to people directly, without any training, then they can get it wrong. Make sure to invest in training Smooth integration with JIRA, but I think this is not realistic. The IBM suite is kind of independent and it's getting more niche because it's not such a big community of users. I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Project Manager and test manager at Venturous Solutions
Real User
2020-02-20T06:38:00Z
Feb 20, 2020
The main competitor of IBM's test management tool is Quality Center. I feel they may have a more user-friendly interface. However, IBM offers a very good management tool and it's integrated well with the different tracking and design testing solutions. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. From a reliability and scalability perspective, it's a good tool. It's well-structured. If they did some upgrades to the interface, it would be just about perfect and I'd rate it closer to nine or nine and a half.
A test management tool is a software application that helps software testers manage the testing process. It can create, track, and execute test cases, manage defects, and generate reports.
I think it's a good and enterprising one. It's good for some people, and some say it is expensive. But for me, I have to say I don't consider finance because that's not my level, but from a usability perspective, I think it is good.
We haven't used the full functionality of the solution yet. We have only used the tracking for a couple of the applications. We haven't used it widely. We are expecting to upgrade the solution and we may use it more after upgrading. I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.
I would give RQM a rating of nine out of ten.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Consider the introduction of the tool in terms of the proper education of the teams who will adapt it. I think any introduction of such a tool requires proper training. It's not so intuitive that people can trust it. If you just give it to people directly, without any training, then they can get it wrong. Make sure to invest in training Smooth integration with JIRA, but I think this is not realistic. The IBM suite is kind of independent and it's getting more niche because it's not such a big community of users. I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The main competitor of IBM's test management tool is Quality Center. I feel they may have a more user-friendly interface. However, IBM offers a very good management tool and it's integrated well with the different tracking and design testing solutions. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. From a reliability and scalability perspective, it's a good tool. It's well-structured. If they did some upgrades to the interface, it would be just about perfect and I'd rate it closer to nine or nine and a half.