We did have some problems with the adjusters. The main issue with this tool is its complexity; while it offers many features, learning and understanding how to use them effectively can be challenging. This difficulty was due to our learning curve rather than any limitations of the tool itself. It took some time to figure out how to use it properly and ensure it worked as needed. I recommend this tool. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Enterprise Architecture practice head at Positive Side Consultancy
Real User
Dec 18, 2023
I rate iServer an eight out of ten. With the help of sample databases, we can minimize some of the features in predefined models before creating customized objects. It aligns them with industry best practices and established standards.
Enterprise Architect at Ecobank Transnational Incorporated
Real User
Jan 17, 2023
I would recommend it. I would recommend going for the SaaS option. It's quite easy and straightforward. It's cost-effective, and it's fit for purpose once you've put it to use. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Find out what your peers are saying about Orbus Software, Sparx Systems, SAP LeanIX and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: January 2026.
Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Nov 8, 2022
I rate this solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend this solution to others, and they should include modelling capabilities and forecasting based on scenario in the next release.
Information Architect at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Dec 22, 2021
I recommend this solution. It's best to start small and grow from there. I work primarily in Ottawa with the government of Canada, and I think iServer is pretty high on their list because it integrates with Microsoft and they have a cloud-first strategy. I rate this solution nine out of 10.
Digital Transformation Expert at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Jul 19, 2020
I'm a consultant. I work with the product, however, I am not a customer. We typically deal with the on-premises deployment model as our clients aren't well-versed in the cloud just yet. I'd advise that those who wish to implement the solution ensure they are well trained on it beforehand. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. If the performance was better, I would rate it much higher.
Enterprise Architect at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Oct 28, 2019
First, decide on the deployment model. Secondly, I would recommend doing the training first. iServer is very easy to learn by yourself, but you can get stuff done quicker if you do the training before you start using it. I would rate it as eight out of ten. If they added data-driven modeling, I would rate it as a nine or ten.
Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) is a strategic discipline that outlines a comprehensive framework to manage and align an organization’s structure, processes, and information systems to achieve its goals and objectives efficiently.Enterprise Architecture Management provides organizations with the methodologies and tools necessary to effectively map out their current structures and future states. This discipline helps navigate the complexities of aligning IT strategies with business...
I would recommend the solution to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
We did have some problems with the adjusters. The main issue with this tool is its complexity; while it offers many features, learning and understanding how to use them effectively can be challenging. This difficulty was due to our learning curve rather than any limitations of the tool itself. It took some time to figure out how to use it properly and ensure it worked as needed. I recommend this tool. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
The tutorials are very impressive. I recommend the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I rate iServer an eight out of ten. With the help of sample databases, we can minimize some of the features in predefined models before creating customized objects. It aligns them with industry best practices and established standards.
I rate iServer an eight out of ten.
I would recommend it. I would recommend going for the SaaS option. It's quite easy and straightforward. It's cost-effective, and it's fit for purpose once you've put it to use. Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
I rate this solution a seven out of ten. I would recommend this solution to others, and they should include modelling capabilities and forecasting based on scenario in the next release.
This is not a product that I recommend for business process design tasks. I would rate this solution a five out of ten.
I recommend this solution. It's best to start small and grow from there. I work primarily in Ottawa with the government of Canada, and I think iServer is pretty high on their list because it integrates with Microsoft and they have a cloud-first strategy. I rate this solution nine out of 10.
I'm a consultant. I work with the product, however, I am not a customer. We typically deal with the on-premises deployment model as our clients aren't well-versed in the cloud just yet. I'd advise that those who wish to implement the solution ensure they are well trained on it beforehand. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. If the performance was better, I would rate it much higher.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
First, decide on the deployment model. Secondly, I would recommend doing the training first. iServer is very easy to learn by yourself, but you can get stuff done quicker if you do the training before you start using it. I would rate it as eight out of ten. If they added data-driven modeling, I would rate it as a nine or ten.