What advice do you have for others considering Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio?

If you want to take design lessons, Azure Machine Learning Studio is the best tool. The product can simplify some AI-driven projects because it currently has extensive database connectivity. For example, it can easily connect to various databases. However, the support for some other databases is presently limited and can be improved. It pulls information from the database. Its good analytics capability makes integrations very simple. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability is irrelevant to the tool. BFSI and IT companies use the product in India. Everyone is trying to leverage AI. The market is going towards AI. I see a lot of opportunity in it. The consumption of AI will increase in the future. I will recommend the solution to my clients. We can support them because we are a partner with Microsoft. The solution enables customers to design flows using most of the available data sources. They can also create algorithms for predictive analysis. Overall, I rate the product a seven out of ten.

I would recommend Azure Machine Learning Studio to others if they have enough resources to handle it. However, it is not a plug-and-play solution; there is a learning curve that needs to be addressed. Overall, I would rate Azure Machine Learning Studio as an eight out of ten.

If it's my recommendation, it's a very competent product. It has all the necessary features for data engineering, data science, and model management. It's a complete suite of products that can address your end-to-end data needs. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I use Azure Machine Learning Studio for predictive modeling in my project. I follow a workflow that involves selecting data, preprocessing it, training models, and deploying them. The Studio's tools cover all these steps, making it convenient for me to build and deploy predictive models. In a specific scenario, I used Azure Machine Learning Studio for data preprocessing by creating new variables. This involved tasks like transforming variable types or combining multiple variables to create new ones. Additionally, I employed cross-validation techniques, such as k-fold validation, to assess model performance and select appropriate metrics for evaluation. The most important aspect of my machine learning projects is the quality of the data. It is crucial to determine whether the data can provide meaningful information relevant to the project's use case, regardless of the specific tools or features used. The drag-and-drop interface of Azure Machine Learning Studio has greatly improved my workflow. It is easy to use and increases productivity by allowing quick experimentation and visualization of data pipelines. This feature enables me to iterate rapidly and efficiently, especially for small projects or presentations. I would rate the performance of the solution at an eight out of ten for my team. However, our data volume is not the largest. While I believe our performance is strong, other companies might rate it lower due to different circumstances. My advice for someone considering installing Azure Machine Learning Studio is that it is user-friendly, especially for technical users. You can easily upload data and analyze it with the examples provided. The drag-and-drop interface makes it intuitive, and upgrading to this tool for data analysis is a good idea. Overall, I would rate Azure Machine Learning Studio as a nine out of ten.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I would recommend Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio to other users. I would also ask users to compare the solution with Microsoft Fabric, which is a collection of components to put a workflow together end to end. Overall, I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a seven out of ten.

We have already implemented some pipelines on Azure, but it's not similar to what Machine Learning Studio offers. People who want to start using the product must read the box. Some things are not easy to implement. We are only using Azure. Overall, I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is very robust for tracking simple experiments. But it falls short when you run when you want to build an entire machine learning framework on top of it. I rate it a seven out of ten.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio does not allow users to have a PnP option, like an ERP or a CRM system, where everything works if you include the data with the system. Sometimes, it is difficult to generate good patterns using the solution. You need to have good experience with the solution to move around with the data from the beginning before coming up with different strategies to end different problems. In general, the product is not a straightforward solution. There is a need for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio's users to put in some programming efforts to make the solution work accurately under different scenarios. I rate the overall solution a six out of ten.

I prefer using Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, which is a powerful tool that can be used to build and deploy machine learning models. I recommend it for small and medium businesses. I rate it a seven out of ten.

I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a seven out of ten.

The solution is easy to use. I advise others to train to know how it works while learning the mathematics behind it. I rate it an eight out of ten.

If you want to train models on larger datasets, then Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a good solution. If you need to run a few diverse set of experiments with different environments, then it really comes in handy. Overall, I would rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio at eight out of ten because it's easy to start using it. Also, it's pretty robust and stable, and the interface is nice to work with.

If you plan to use this solution, I suggest you not be intimidated by its complexity at first. You will gain more clarity regarding the solution over time with perseverance and practice. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I am an end user. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'm pretty happy with its capabilities.

I give the solution an eight out of ten. I began using Azure three months ago, connecting my local Visual Code environment with the actual environment. This was a major improvement for me, as I can now work and run experiments on my local computer. I'm really pleased with how comfortable I am using Azure on all platforms. The solution requires a minimum of one developer for maintenance. We need a DevOps developer and the tech lead to define the scope of the problems to be solved. The tech lead will provide guidance and oversight, while the DevOps developer will be responsible for implementing the solutions. I enjoy working and have no difficulty in recommending Azure Machine Learning Studio to others, however, I recognize that there are many implementations utilizing AWS. AWS is a formidable competitor, so it is essential to be familiar with both solutions. Unfortunately, I have missed out on opportunities because I am not situated in the US. The environment is excellent, however, the large American market and the companies therein rely heavily on our work. This requires me to stay apprised of current developments, such as the widespread adoption of AWS, and learn how to use alternative platforms.

I would advise others to identify the communication between servers and the client tools correctly as well as the user allocation for those. If you are working from a client environment and connecting to the server, it is important that the configuration is done correctly. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a cloud-native solution. It's completely cloud-based. My company has eight users of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio. My rating for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is seven out of ten.

We're a customer and an end-user. We're using the latest version of the solution. I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I believe Azure Machine Learning has a very good pre-built model which enables quick development of solutions, particularly text analytics and cognitive-based solutions. I rate this solution nine out of 10.

We are only testing, and we have to be very careful of the restrictions. I'm a little bit aware of the issues about ML Ops, and I am trying to see if Azure Machine Learning Studio can address those issues. For now, I would rate it a seven out of 10. I have to explore it more.

I would rate this solution as seven out of ten.

I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio seven out of 10. I would definitely recommend it to customers. The autoML, in particular, has some very advanced features.

I would recommend this solution to others. I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a seven out of ten.

I rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio a seven out of ten.

I'm just a student. I was learning about machine learning via this product. I'm not sure which deployment model we are using. I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I would advise other potential users to just start using it. If they really want to learn it, it will take a bit of time. Even though it's easy to use, you need some knowledge in data science. That will help make the process easier.

If you want to build a solution quickly without knowing any coding, it's pretty good to start with. I will take a week to learn, from my experience. For anyone who is interested in trying it, they should start with the free version, which is free for up to 10 gigabytes of workspace. Just log in and start developing and exploring the tool before onboarding. I would rate Microsoft Azure Machine Learning a seven out of ten.

We're just a Microsoft customer. We don't have a business relationship with Microsoft. Currently, it is my understanding that we are using the latest version of the solution. I'd recommend this product to other organizations. Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

The major advice I give is that clients must get the user,somebody who understands the business issues, to be deeply involved with it and the data transformation. Most people don't. And that's true for data science applications. We don't just follow the data in a big pile and remodel, we advance the process that we're modeling. Consider what transformations of the data you need to make it workable and usable. Remember, over half the initial value of modeling is the strategic understanding provided re the importance of different variables to the model and hence the organizaion's performance. Very often the modeling identifies opportunities for changing structures, decision rules, etc. even prior to the model's actual implementation technically. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

I would Definitely recommend Azure Machine Learning Studio — no doubt about it, it's a full-contact solution. Having said that, it really depends on the customer's appetite and what they're comfortable with. For example, I have interacted with people who prefer a basic Google cloud platform — from an AML perspective, they just feel like it's primarily Google. Not because of AML per se, it's more from a data storage perspective, which in this case, works better. Personally, I come from a VFA site in the financial sector. Over there, the customers are really conscious about hosting their station or their data, especially on the cloud. Typically, they are very restricted because they are not comfortable hosting customer data on the cloud. This is where I think Azure or Google or even AWS fall short — they don't play any role there. Because of this, people actually customize their solutions or model them to fit their custom sites and customer-based solutions. Overall, I would give this solution a rating of seven. It's a great option if you are fairly new and don't want to write too much code. As long as the model is not too complex, it's a pretty easy solution to roll out.

I feel that this is a great solution. Even for people from the business side, this is a very good product. It is so intuitive that all of the information is there. The interface takes care of the most complex part, which has to do with the modeling. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

I haven't done any research into what features they have on their roadmap. Overall, I think that this is a comparable product. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

It's an easy tool. They have a good level of resources and we are pretty low with resources as far as data science is concerned. Azure Machine Learning offers an opportunity for those who haven't been introduced to Azure programming. You can use the data analytics and their statistics skills to build and deploy data science solutions that can be beneficial for society and for different organizations. I would rate it a seven out of ten.

I would recommend the product. It's a solution that can cover all the processes from data preparation to mobilization data while serving the clients and production. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I'm a consultant. Our company is partners with Microsoft. Users will find it easy to get into Azure. Even if they aren't always in touch with Azure, they'll find themselves in touch with the dynamic field. Users have to get into Azure because once they get into the cloud, they should have some basic understanding of Azure itself. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. However, I don't know their competitors, so I can't really compare them to others on the market.

Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is a good solution that would recommend to others, but I would like to see more support and more information available for developers. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to be prepared to take a slow approach to get the best results. The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this solution is that the strategic outsourcing contact will need to have a strategy for the next three to five years because the efficiencies that we will be gaining from AI will reduce the requirements on physical staff doing traditional roles. However, the support element will increase. It means that the roles will change and evolve over the next three to five years within the UK contact center based on the deployment of AI. I think that we probably didn't start from the point that would have benefited us most in terms of the AI. Had we put more research into the front end then there would have been a lot less work during the implementation. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

Microsoft has increased the usability and the features since we first implemented this solution. If I had to start this process over again, I would involve Microsoft earlier because they were great for providing support, as well as guidance on the architecture and what kind of stuff you can do with the tool, and what you should do with it. This was very helpful to orient the team to the right documentation and tutorials. The second thing I would do is to start working with DevOps activity as soon as you can. We found ourselves redoing the same things many times, instead of having a DevOps pipeline to implement the stuff that we already stabilized, for example, and then not losing time. The third thing is involving an integrator to help put together the big picture. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.