I would advise other users to use Miro as it is a simple-to-use tool. Firstly, I use Miro and Microsoft Teams, but Miro is much more intuitive. You can place it visually on everything and in one place. You can put the table, the worksheets, the PDF, and diagrams to be visualized and laced; it is beneficial. On the other hand, when you have, for example, many files and need a large team to access them, it's better to keep it on some other platform like Teams. Navigation between documents is better in Teams than Miro when dealing with more complex projects. Secondly, I think there is a need for a project manager to take out the benefits of the application. So, the platform is not for everybody; it is specifically designed for projects with a specific start and end time. And then, you have to place the results, the outcomes, and the documents and create them in the leading system. I feel Miro is not for keeping evidence or storing documentation. But if you can take the documents and outcomes and keep them saved in some other platform, then Miro is perfect for your organization or project. So I would recommend having a project manager in the company, who should be the main editor of the Miro. I'd rate Miro a ten out of ten overall.
Miro is a collaborative online whiteboard platform that enables teams to work together remotely, brainstorm ideas, and visualize concepts. With its intuitive interface and extensive range of features, Miro has become a popular tool for remote teams, designers, and educators.
One of the key features of Miro is its vast library of templates and widgets, which allows users to quickly create various types of visual content such as mind maps, flowcharts, wireframes, and user journey maps. These...
Due to the flexibility and other benefits I've mentioned, I would recommend using Miro to others.
I would advise other users to use Miro as it is a simple-to-use tool. Firstly, I use Miro and Microsoft Teams, but Miro is much more intuitive. You can place it visually on everything and in one place. You can put the table, the worksheets, the PDF, and diagrams to be visualized and laced; it is beneficial. On the other hand, when you have, for example, many files and need a large team to access them, it's better to keep it on some other platform like Teams. Navigation between documents is better in Teams than Miro when dealing with more complex projects. Secondly, I think there is a need for a project manager to take out the benefits of the application. So, the platform is not for everybody; it is specifically designed for projects with a specific start and end time. And then, you have to place the results, the outcomes, and the documents and create them in the leading system. I feel Miro is not for keeping evidence or storing documentation. But if you can take the documents and outcomes and keep them saved in some other platform, then Miro is perfect for your organization or project. So I would recommend having a project manager in the company, who should be the main editor of the Miro. I'd rate Miro a ten out of ten overall.
I only used the SaaS version of Miro because I only use it for school projects. Overall, I rate Miro a nine out of ten.
Use this product if you have large teams working remotely.