What advice do you have for others considering MongoDB Atlas?

MongoDB is a very good tool for first-time users. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Security is primarily organized around organizational principles, allowing you to customize and adjust each tool according to your specific security policies. I recommend the product. Every product serves a purpose as long as it addresses the right problem. MongoDB Atlas has proven particularly effective for applications such as analytics and IoT, making it a recommended choice for those use cases. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

If you want to go with NoSQL, I would suggest using MongoDB. If you are saving documents and prefer AWS services, AWS also has their DynamoDB for that purpose. I would suggest using AWS service if all of your services are already on AWS. Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten.

We have assigned DevOps for security. The overview and monitoring part will address this issue, and then we will use it to observe any increasing traffic on our website. We also monitor the rising number of connections due to this traffic. It's quite easy to oversee everything in one place. However, the UI isn't particularly user-friendly. I've also used it in my previous company and found it handy and easy to configure, including easy capabilities. We are establishing SLAs that are directly tied to MongoDB. All are interconnected with MongoDB. If MongoDB experiences downtime or RAM or CPU usage spikes significantly, users may encounter difficulties logging in. This reliance on MongoDB can pose challenges for user accessibility, particularly when considering the conferencing tools we use. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

MongoDB's default encryption provides a baseline for data protection. The flexibility to let customers manage their encryption keys enhances security. MongoDB Atlas supports our organization's implementation of microservices architecture by seamlessly fitting into our domain-driven design. While we primarily use domain-driven design rather than microservices, MongoDB Atlas offers flexibility and scalability to meet various requirements. It easily accommodates diverse data structures and events related to our customers, allowing for efficient and straightforward implementation. Overall, I would rate MongoDB Atlas as a seven out of ten. My advice to new users is to design your schema thoughtfully, considering MongoDB's document limitations. Utilize profiling and set up alerts for scaling issues. Understand how to query efficiently and focus on proper indexing for improved performance.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would recommend using this product. If you need a no-SQL database, then MongoDB is a good choice.

MongoDB Atlas is a convenient database that you need to start using. I rate it a nine out of ten.

MongoDB Atlas is a cloud-based solution. The solution's installation, setting up, and integration are relatively easy. MongoDB Atlas provides the functionalities it promises. Users should focus on the technical design and figure out how they want the data, what data scheme they're aiming for, how to build properly, and how to design data properly. For everything else, they provide you with enough tools to understand what you're doing pretty much by yourself. Overall, I rate MongoDB Atlas a nine out of ten.

MongoDB Atlas is a wonderful product. It is one of the top database platforms. I recommend it to companies planning to use the standard transaction maintenance. I rate it a nine out of ten.

I recommend the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

MongoDB Atlas has a good partnership with AWS, and there is no hassle in integrating the solution with any tool. I recommend users go ahead with MongoDB Atlas if they prefer to have NoSQL in their organization. Overall, I rate MongoDB Atlas ten out of ten.

The product is cloud-based. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

I would advise others to use the free component of MongoDB Atlas to see if the solution can be maintained in their organization. I rate MongoDB Atlas a nine out of ten.

I highly recommend every developer use it.

I give the solution an eight out of ten. I am not familiar with other SQL databases on the cloud. I know that Atlas is quite stable and the service is good, providing customers with all the necessary features to use it as a service. MongoDB Atlas is integrated and available on Google, AWS, and Azure. I advise people to take advantage of the free courses from MongoDB University that are very well done to gain a general knowledge of MongoDB. Therefore, if someone has no experience with Mongo, they can get great preparation for the MongoDB University course without spending any money.

I'm using MongoDB Atlas version 4.2. The solution is deployed on the MongoDB cloud. Around four people, mainly developers and techs, use MongoDB Atlas within the company. I recommend MongoDB Atlas to others because of the support my company gets, apart from the product being schemaless. MongoDB Atlas also has other features, and you can take advantage of MongoDB Realm, so it's like getting more than one product. My rating for MongoDB Atlas is eight out of ten. My company is a MongoDB Atlas customer.

I have some experience with MongoDB Atlas. I remember using version 4.2 of MongoDB Atlas. I advise anyone planning to implement MongoDB Atlas to start small and get around the platform and documentation. Learn about the MongoDB Atlas fundamentals, such as VPC pairing, etc. If you want to scale the solution, review the documentation on that first, apart from learning the platform. My rating for MongoDB Atlas is seven out of ten.

I give the solution an eight out of ten. We have eight to ten people using the solution in our organization. I recommend the solution. There are no problems with MongoDB Atlas

I rate the solution an eight out of ten because it's a good product. It supports many functionalities, is easier to implement, and the only issue is speed. It also doesn't have a lot of features that could support Joins. So if they fix that, I could scale my rating as high as nine or ten. I would recommend the solution. It is very developer-friendly, and the learning curve is not that high.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10. I would recommend this solution to those who want to start using it.

I would rate this solution 9 out of 10. I would recommend MongoDB Atlas for those who want to start using it.

I would rate this solution 10 out of 10. It's a solid product. A lot of issues have been resolved. It's very sustainable, and it takes minimal effort to solve a problem. It's very easy to deploy.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. It's brilliant for what we are using it for. I'd recommend the solution to others.

I rate MongoDB Atlas a ten out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would recommend MongoDB Atlas to potential users. You can bootstrap very quickly and It doesn't constrain you in any way. On a scale from one to ten, I would give MongoDB Atlas a nine.

I would recommend MongoDB Atlas to be used by other people, because this is the current technology which everyone should use. I am still new with it, but since I mentioned that I'm using this product for only the last six months and my experience with this product is good thus far, on a scale of one to ten, I would give MongoDB Atlas a six.

I have been happy with the service. Everything is good. Though, nothing stands out to me as exceptional. I would encourage someone to look at DynamoDB, even though I am fine with MongoDB. If you are in a fully integrated into the AWS environment, you might want to stick with Amazon Web Services rather than a third-party. We use it as a service, so we don't configure anything.

Look at what MongoDB can do for you in terms of database back-end persistence. I would recommend to look at this first before you start looking at other solutions. My company is interested in putting out products that are reliable for our customers, which we can monitor easily. We also want them to be easy to install and deploy, which is why I am happy with this one. We are running this on an AWS instance. We use RADIUS, but I don't know if it is integrated with this product. We also use Python on the back-end, which is integrated with MongoDB.

I would recommend the product. I have only used the AWS version.

It is a great product. It works fine, so we recommend it. We are continuing to use and expand it. Right now, MongoDB is deployed for a very specific use case. However, it is something that we always consider when we are looking to migrate away from traditional RDBMS, like Oracle and SQL Server, then MongoDB is on the top of that list. We see if it is capable of supporting the app as written. I was not involved in the implementation or configuration. The product is hosted on AWS.

We are always integrating this product with our business applications because it is a database. Without our applications, the product doesn't make sense. The integration is quite straightforward, because of the consistences within MongoDB, you can find where to connect it. I have used both the AWS and the on-premise versions. The AWS integration allows you to go faster in terms of deployment and the tooling in the cloud also allows you to go faster.

I would recommend it. It is better than the legacy databases, and it is very good with the cloud. We integrated it with TestRail and JIRA. Everything is on cloud. It integrates well, and we are happy with it.

I would recommend MongoDB. I would like to bring in MongoDB at my new company, though I doubt it will happen.

I would recommend MongoDB. The integration and configuration of the product on the AWS environment is fine. We use the AWS version of this product. We also use WebEx, and it works well.