I am just a technical team member that deploys and installs the tool. The tool is not integrated with third-party products. Overall, my company is satisfied with the performance offered by Oracle WebLogic Server. The only problem with the businesses stems from the fact that nobody wants to pay to use the product on OCI. People prefer to use alternate tools that are available for free and offer great features. The aforementioned area consists of reasons why my company is searching for better options in the market. I think it is good software and there are no issues if you use it. It is a good platform to support all the applications. I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
We haven't noticed any significant improvements in application deployment or management with Oracle WebLogic Server. Since our application traffic isn't massive and doesn't require heavy encryption, we haven't encountered any opportunities for business enhancement. However, we still rely on WebLogic for accessing performance data and records. The clustering feature of Oracle WebLogic Server is the most beneficial for application performance, as it enables handling high traffic without compromising service continuity. In my experience, applications running on WebLogic without clustering struggled with performance issues, particularly in handling high-traffic loads. I haven't worked extensively with the security features in WebLogic Server, but I have heard it offers powerful security layers with options for network protection, encryption, and server blocking. I strongly recommend Oracle WebLogic Server as an enterprise solution for applications. Its user-friendly platform, on-premises monitoring capabilities, high level of customization, and powerful scripting tool make it a robust choice for businesses. Overall, I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server as an eight out of ten.
Only one administrator is needed for the solution's installation, deployment, and maintenance. I would recommend Oracle WebLogic Server to other users. Overall, I rate Oracle WebLogic Server a nine out of ten.
Oracle WebLogic Server is not difficult to maintain. It is easy to maintain. A developer or consultant should have a basic knowledge of servers and or Windows Server, wherever it is installed in their company. A company's developer or consultant should do regular maintenance activities like checking if logs are getting written properly while also ensuring that configurations are taken care of on a regular basis. The maintenance part may not seem easy, aforementioned aspects have to be taken care of to maintain the product. Oracle WebLogic Server is a product meant for those who want a stable and scalable tool in their environment. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
My advice would be to have a good book on performance issues. While it's a stable server, you need to put in the effort to know and understand it. It's not just a series of next-click installations but rather a basic installation that requires knowledge and learning. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would like to see improvements in administrative tools and diagnostic tools.
I would recommend people to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Although some configurations are difficult, the solution is easy to use. Overall, I rate Oracle WebLogic Server an eight out of ten.
You need to have planning if you decide to buy the solution. After learning it, you should go through the concept again because, initially, the theory part may not make sense. Next, you should start with the procedure to verify your learning. Then, with some experience, go back to the theory part to grasp and understand the concept. I recommend the solution to others and rate it as an eight.
I'm using the latest version of Oracle WebLogic Server. Thirty people use Oracle WebLogic Server within the company. Some administrators and some developers. Two developers handle the deployment and maintenance of the Oracle WebLogic Server, but one's a backup. At this point, there's no plan to increase the usage of the solution. I would recommend Oracle WebLogic Server to others. My rating for Oracle WebLogic Server is seven out of ten because of some difficulties people have experienced in dealing with the solution.
Java Full Stack Developer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2021-07-04T11:23:19Z
Jul 4, 2021
Those wanting to implement this solution will need to check what their desired functionality specific to the implementation is and if it in fact the solution can satisfy the purpose. For example, if the solution can operate without customization, and if so, you can relax and do the implementation easily. However, if your implementation requires a lot of customization changes, such as changing the behavior or the skin, it will not be straightforward. You will need to spend a lot of time getting the knowledge to do the customizations. I rate Oracle WebLogic Server a six out of ten.
Director of Integration and Support Services at FIPCO
Real User
2020-08-11T06:17:30Z
Aug 11, 2020
My advice to people considering WebLogic as a solution is to do the same thing that we do right now and what we make sure our clients do. Doing due diligence is not really an option. You have to make sure that a solution — any solution you are considering — matches up with the use cases you are planning to deploy it for. There is no point in investing in the wrong solution. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server as a seven or eight. If I had to choose between those, I would say seven. It could easily be better and that really detracts from the user and administrative experience.
Oracle WebLogic Server is widely used for deploying, managing, and monitoring Java-based applications. It's essential for core banking, e-commerce, insurance portals, and enterprise documentation management.
Businesses rely on Oracle WebLogic Server for its stability, performance, and scalability. The server supports the deployment of multiple applications, including SOAP backend services, integration apps, and interactive interfaces. It's also known for robust load distribution and...
I am just a technical team member that deploys and installs the tool. The tool is not integrated with third-party products. Overall, my company is satisfied with the performance offered by Oracle WebLogic Server. The only problem with the businesses stems from the fact that nobody wants to pay to use the product on OCI. People prefer to use alternate tools that are available for free and offer great features. The aforementioned area consists of reasons why my company is searching for better options in the market. I think it is good software and there are no issues if you use it. It is a good platform to support all the applications. I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
We haven't noticed any significant improvements in application deployment or management with Oracle WebLogic Server. Since our application traffic isn't massive and doesn't require heavy encryption, we haven't encountered any opportunities for business enhancement. However, we still rely on WebLogic for accessing performance data and records. The clustering feature of Oracle WebLogic Server is the most beneficial for application performance, as it enables handling high traffic without compromising service continuity. In my experience, applications running on WebLogic without clustering struggled with performance issues, particularly in handling high-traffic loads. I haven't worked extensively with the security features in WebLogic Server, but I have heard it offers powerful security layers with options for network protection, encryption, and server blocking. I strongly recommend Oracle WebLogic Server as an enterprise solution for applications. Its user-friendly platform, on-premises monitoring capabilities, high level of customization, and powerful scripting tool make it a robust choice for businesses. Overall, I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server as an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it seven out of ten.
Only one administrator is needed for the solution's installation, deployment, and maintenance. I would recommend Oracle WebLogic Server to other users. Overall, I rate Oracle WebLogic Server a nine out of ten.
Oracle WebLogic Server is not difficult to maintain. It is easy to maintain. A developer or consultant should have a basic knowledge of servers and or Windows Server, wherever it is installed in their company. A company's developer or consultant should do regular maintenance activities like checking if logs are getting written properly while also ensuring that configurations are taken care of on a regular basis. The maintenance part may not seem easy, aforementioned aspects have to be taken care of to maintain the product. Oracle WebLogic Server is a product meant for those who want a stable and scalable tool in their environment. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
My advice would be to have a good book on performance issues. While it's a stable server, you need to put in the effort to know and understand it. It's not just a series of next-click installations but rather a basic installation that requires knowledge and learning. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. I would like to see improvements in administrative tools and diagnostic tools.
I would recommend people to use Oracle WebLogic Server. Although some configurations are difficult, the solution is easy to use. Overall, I rate Oracle WebLogic Server an eight out of ten.
I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
You need to have planning if you decide to buy the solution. After learning it, you should go through the concept again because, initially, the theory part may not make sense. Next, you should start with the procedure to verify your learning. Then, with some experience, go back to the theory part to grasp and understand the concept. I recommend the solution to others and rate it as an eight.
I'm using the latest version of Oracle WebLogic Server. Thirty people use Oracle WebLogic Server within the company. Some administrators and some developers. Two developers handle the deployment and maintenance of the Oracle WebLogic Server, but one's a backup. At this point, there's no plan to increase the usage of the solution. I would recommend Oracle WebLogic Server to others. My rating for Oracle WebLogic Server is seven out of ten because of some difficulties people have experienced in dealing with the solution.
I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten. We have been happy with it.
On a scale of one to ten, I would give Oracle WebLogic Server a nine.
We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well. From an ability perspective, I would rate it an eight out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it. I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server a nine out of ten.
Those wanting to implement this solution will need to check what their desired functionality specific to the implementation is and if it in fact the solution can satisfy the purpose. For example, if the solution can operate without customization, and if so, you can relax and do the implementation easily. However, if your implementation requires a lot of customization changes, such as changing the behavior or the skin, it will not be straightforward. You will need to spend a lot of time getting the knowledge to do the customizations. I rate Oracle WebLogic Server a six out of ten.
I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
My advice to people considering WebLogic as a solution is to do the same thing that we do right now and what we make sure our clients do. Doing due diligence is not really an option. You have to make sure that a solution — any solution you are considering — matches up with the use cases you are planning to deploy it for. There is no point in investing in the wrong solution. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate Oracle WebLogic Server as a seven or eight. If I had to choose between those, I would say seven. It could easily be better and that really detracts from the user and administrative experience.