We recommend the product to our customers. Organizations can buy the product if they are ready to spend a lot of money. They must be aware that the support is average. However, the tool is very good. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
On the technology stack we're currently using, we're exploring other technologies based on our platform and it includes many of our products. But we may explore other technologies to make it more seamless. But PingID is going to stay. We want to use something like biometrics to make it easier for shop floor workers. But if anything, I need an expansion of PingID. It's a good, stable product, and they've served our needs very well. They've been very responsive, and the product is scalable. It's pretty robust. The desktop is customized to what we do here at GE, but they work a bit with us on it. So it's an excellent product. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
PingID's team was pretty good. We were trying to build a solution and wanted to deploy it for only a couple of hundreds of customers. We didn't want to sign up for a 1,500 or 5,000 feet plan. PingID was pretty understanding about our needs and provided us with great plans for the smallest fee they could provide. We had good negotiations with them, and they were pretty friendly. PingID provided all the required technical support even before we signed up. The sales manager ensured he supported me throughout the process, and we signed a deal with PingID. Overall, I rate PingID an eight and a half out of ten.
Regional IT Application Owner at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2021-04-22T07:19:21Z
Apr 22, 2021
We are a customer and an end-user. Currently, the solution fulfills the use cases that we currently have. That's pretty much it. I'm not sure about the configuration or on the infrastructure side. Maybe the team who does this infrastructure setup would have better insights. However, overall, it's a pretty seamless experience, I would say. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-01-19T06:38:00Z
Jan 19, 2020
We use a hybrid deployment model and are using the latest version of Ping. It's being used quite extensively in our organization, although I'm unsure as to if we have plans to increase usage. If someone is looking for a solution that works both for on-prem or hybrid, I strongly recommend opting for the cloud. It's a simple implementation and the solution is quite interesting. There are a lot of integrations. The on-prem is not very easy to implement in comparison to the cloud but it's very good, and, for organizations with on-premise requirements, it's bound to be one of the top choices. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
Service Delivery Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-11-07T10:36:00Z
Nov 7, 2019
We are using the on-premises deployment model. I'd warn that a company integrating the solution should keep in mind that if they have a lot of applications, the implementation will get complex. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
I would advise focussing on one solution because we do not use other solutions. This solution has functionalities that are enough so I would recommend to focus on one, and not try to integrate other solutions because it increases cost. I would rate it a nine out of ten.
IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten because there is room for improvement in terms of usability.
We recommend the product to our customers. Organizations can buy the product if they are ready to spend a lot of money. They must be aware that the support is average. However, the tool is very good. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
I would rate the product a nine out of ten.
I rate PingID eight out of 10. I would recommend it depending on the use case. You need to clarify your requirements before implementing the solution.
On the technology stack we're currently using, we're exploring other technologies based on our platform and it includes many of our products. But we may explore other technologies to make it more seamless. But PingID is going to stay. We want to use something like biometrics to make it easier for shop floor workers. But if anything, I need an expansion of PingID. It's a good, stable product, and they've served our needs very well. They've been very responsive, and the product is scalable. It's pretty robust. The desktop is customized to what we do here at GE, but they work a bit with us on it. So it's an excellent product. I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
PingID's team was pretty good. We were trying to build a solution and wanted to deploy it for only a couple of hundreds of customers. We didn't want to sign up for a 1,500 or 5,000 feet plan. PingID was pretty understanding about our needs and provided us with great plans for the smallest fee they could provide. We had good negotiations with them, and they were pretty friendly. PingID provided all the required technical support even before we signed up. The sales manager ensured he supported me throughout the process, and we signed a deal with PingID. Overall, I rate PingID an eight and a half out of ten.
Overall, I would rate PingID a nine out of ten.
Ping is a suitable on-premise Active Directory in the IT environment. I would rate the solution a seven out of ten.
We are a customer and an end-user. Currently, the solution fulfills the use cases that we currently have. That's pretty much it. I'm not sure about the configuration or on the infrastructure side. Maybe the team who does this infrastructure setup would have better insights. However, overall, it's a pretty seamless experience, I would say. I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
We use a hybrid deployment model and are using the latest version of Ping. It's being used quite extensively in our organization, although I'm unsure as to if we have plans to increase usage. If someone is looking for a solution that works both for on-prem or hybrid, I strongly recommend opting for the cloud. It's a simple implementation and the solution is quite interesting. There are a lot of integrations. The on-prem is not very easy to implement in comparison to the cloud but it's very good, and, for organizations with on-premise requirements, it's bound to be one of the top choices. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
We are using the on-premises deployment model. I'd warn that a company integrating the solution should keep in mind that if they have a lot of applications, the implementation will get complex. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.
I would advise focussing on one solution because we do not use other solutions. This solution has functionalities that are enough so I would recommend to focus on one, and not try to integrate other solutions because it increases cost. I would rate it a nine out of ten.