What advice do you have for others considering Postman?

I would recommend enhancing Postman's integration capabilities with test management tools to better consolidate testing metrics. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Postman is really great if you are working with APIs. It is very easy to understand, and I think that a lot of tutorials are already available on YouTube. I don't think you have to break your head to understand it separately. The tool's user interface is very friendly, and it is very easy to use. I have not used to the monitoring and automation features of the product. The integration capabilities of Postman help streamline development processes, and it is one of its main highlights. Presently, I think Postman lets you interact with other tools and web applications. It makes the development phase easy. Postman is a really good tool for API integration. I don't see the tool lacking any features because Postman helps us with all the data governance parts. It may not exactly be easy for beginners to start learning how to use Postman for the first time. If he or she has experience working with API, then it might be easy to use Postman. For people who have no experience with APIs, it might be a bit difficult in the beginning to use Postman, but after a certain point in time, it will be easy. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

The product is not used for collaboration but for testing purposes in my company. In short, I use the product, and it is not used for exchanging or exporting data. I use the product at a very personal level, considering its API-related capabilities. The tool performs well enough to meet my expectations. I rate the tool an eight to nine out of ten.

I would recommend others to use Postman. I am a QA, and I should know about different products before I use Postman. In short, a person should know to use it. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

I can recommend Postman to others. Considering the shortcomings that stem from Postman's pricing model and issues with support, I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

Postman is one of the most widely used tools in the market. When you use it, it is practical and useful. You need to check whether it suits your team, project type, and work to take profit from the way Postman works. From the beginning, it is one of the three main tools you must explore if you regularly deal with APIs. However, I am still exploring all the tools, and I don't know if I can maintain it or not. When I know all the different technologies better, I will be able to say. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. The product's user interface is better than others.

The solution has all the essential features. I recommend it to others and rate it as a ten.

I advise others to gain knowledge of JavaScript. It will help them use the solution's test automation framework with ease. I rate the solution as a nine.

It is easy to use. However, it does not allow for Socket and SOAP API testing.

I am an end-user. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I've been happy with its capabilities so far.

I rate Postman a seven out of 10. I think seven is a decent score because it's a solid tool that installs quickly and has tons of features. Postman supports multiple formats of REST and GraphQL. You can automate your test suite and run regressions. I don't think Postman lets you connect to a lot of databases, which could be a limitation, but I recommend it.

I would rate this solution as four out of ten. If you don't have SoapUI or if you don't know about SoapUI, then of course you can use it. If you want to explore Postman, it's a free tool.

From a collaboration point of view, it's a useful tool. It's also super user-friendly. I'd rate it nine out of ten overall.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I rate Postman a nine out of ten.

You can just give it a try. You can start with the free version and later upgrade to the paid ones. You would be able to do most of the things through the free version of Postman. You can just learn the basic commands of Postman, various types of authentications, and the basics of API. You can learn how to send the environment variables, how to set the headers, etc. If you know all these things, it's very easy to use the Postman tool on a daily basis. It's a very good product. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We are a Postman partner. I've been using an older version of the solution. I'm not on the latest deployment. I'd advise others that it is important to have project middleware functionality, including for the access level. When I work with clients, I will ask for the certifications of the tool. Once the tool is initiated, 99.9% of the time, there is no management involvement here. It's signed off on. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

The solution requires an awareness of APIs, JSON format, XML format, schema, and Java scripting. I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten. You can use Postman if you are a beginner or trying to learn API. Small-scale organizations can also use it because it does not need any license. Postman is gaining pace because it supports the Google Chrome compatibility rate and plugin support. It is easy to set it up for the testing team. It is a good tool, but it still needs improvement for a scalable API tool. Regarding advice, there are some secure APIs in different organizations, so it's better to get approval from your manager or architect so that APIs are not exposed. Also, it is important to be cautious about the organization's sensitive data before implementing Postman.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Postman a nine.

I would rate this solution eight out of 10. Regarding our relationship with the vendor, as far as I'm aware, the company has no business relationship with Postman. We use the product because it's the world's most commonly used open-source tool for repair testing. Regarding the number of staff required for the daily maintenance of the solution, we only make changes when the Postman tool or the contract changes. API contracts are modified daily. Most staff members continually modify or update these collections. Our developers use Postman at least once a day when developing. My advice for others looking to implement Postman in their companies is that there is no reason to implement Postman. Plenty of other solutions are available, but most people are familiar with Postman because it appears in several YouTube tutorials.

This is a fairly good tool and I would recommend it to others. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Postman has taken the development community by storm. A lot of developers are using Postman for different things. Not everybody understands the end-to-end capability of Postman yet; one person might think it's only for testing, another that you can build applications, and somebody else might use it for documentation. Different developers look at it from different perspectives, and it has huge versatility. I rate this solution nine out of 10.

It is doing what it is supposed to do. It is a pretty nice tool, and there should not be any problem in using it. It is definitely better than other alternatives. Based on my experience so far, it is a flawless product. I don't see any bugs or any kind of technical issues in using it. It is pretty easy to use and easy to learn. If you want to start with API testing, you can go ahead and start with Postman. It is the easiest option available in the market. I would rate it a nine out of 10.

I rate Postman eight out of 10. I recommend investing in Postman, which has a lot of features. You can use it to save scenarios then export, store, and reuse them. Postman already has a lot of features that I like.

It's important to figure out your requirements and if you need something special, then you will have to compare the different applications and figure out which gives you better results. I rate the solution seven out of 10.

Make sure that the tool that you choose will solve the problems that you have and meet your goals. I only have experience with Postman, so I can't recommend anything else. I would rate Postman a nine out of ten.

I would absolutely recommend this solution. It's one of the best solutions for testing REST APIs. I had some great experiences using Postman, especially relating to REST APIs. Currently, I am in the process of learning about other tools suitable for API testing regarding SOAP APIs. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Postman a rating of eight.

It's a good tool overall and quite stable. It is mainly used for testing purposes, API responses, and validations. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.

On a scale of one to ten I would rate it an eight.

When it comes to anything API related, I would recommend this solution. For anything API-related, it's perfect. REST API is the way to go and I would recommend Postman for it. I would rate it an eight out of ten. The pricing is the only improvement. Its competitors are quite pricey. But it would be nice if there were more options like annual, monthly or enterprise-level.

The deployment is done by the development team. We have a giant scrum we follow. Development does the deployment using XL Deploy. And right now they are not using Jenkins. I would rate it a seven out of ten.

I'm perfectly happy with this solution and I'm really enjoying it. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We started using this solution because we have a requirement to do more integration testing and automated regression testing. Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: * Saves time. * Creates automate processes. * Easy to use. * Easy to understand. * Provides knowledge transfer. * Less coding involved. * Does not take up a lot of memory. * Cost.