Redis is beneficial for specific usage and domains. If Redis can handle various data types efficiently, it would become a comprehensive solution for any use case, potentially topping other databases. Its consistent results and free, open-source nature make it a solid choice. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Use Redis wisely because it is a single-threaded tool. There was an issue we faced in the past where a query was not optimized, which impacted performance significantly.
I haven't explored AI-driven initiatives yet, but they are on my road map. I would recommend Redis for all kinds of caching and message brokering needs. It's a reliable and straightforward solution. Overall, I would rate Redis ten out of ten.
With Redis, I can create lists and key-value pairs. The solution also provides many features for storing data in cache. Storing data in memory using Redis is faster than using traditional databases like Postgres or MySQL. If you are communicating with the services, you can use the solution's Pub/Sub capabilities to send messages, store data in cache, and share it with other microservices. The solution's data persistence model has greatly benefited our resilience, especially when storing any key-value pair. You can install the solution on the local machine or cloud servers like AWS or Google Cloud. I would recommend Redis to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
Team Lead at Braveryes Engineering and Services Private Limited
Real User
Top 20
2024-05-18T06:15:41Z
May 18, 2024
If you have a large amount of non-dynamic data that needs to be delivered to the client, you should use Redis. I don't think that it will support AI initiatives since it doesn't support continuous data. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It's been very stable so far and performs well within our system. I would recommend it, but I would also highlight the cost factor as something to consider.
Redis is deployed on-cloud in our organization. When it started, Redis had a very simple structure, but now it has a lot of powerful data structures. Users should investigate because they can use other things for their data structure. Redis has more new use cases. Users must consider that Redis is single-threaded, which might take a toll on them when they write to Redis. This might be an issue if you need very high throughput with writes. Overall, I rate Redis a nine out of ten.
I'd rate it an eight out of ten because it did what I needed, and it did a good job. However, currently, not every product in the Redis ecosystem has a great community or great support.
NoSQL databases represent a major departure from traditional relational databases. They are designed to handle a wide variety of data models beyond just relational data, including columnar, document, key-value and graph formats.
Redis is beneficial for specific usage and domains. If Redis can handle various data types efficiently, it would become a comprehensive solution for any use case, potentially topping other databases. Its consistent results and free, open-source nature make it a solid choice. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
Use Redis wisely because it is a single-threaded tool. There was an issue we faced in the past where a query was not optimized, which impacted performance significantly.
I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.
Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.
I haven't explored AI-driven initiatives yet, but they are on my road map. I would recommend Redis for all kinds of caching and message brokering needs. It's a reliable and straightforward solution. Overall, I would rate Redis ten out of ten.
With Redis, I can create lists and key-value pairs. The solution also provides many features for storing data in cache. Storing data in memory using Redis is faster than using traditional databases like Postgres or MySQL. If you are communicating with the services, you can use the solution's Pub/Sub capabilities to send messages, store data in cache, and share it with other microservices. The solution's data persistence model has greatly benefited our resilience, especially when storing any key-value pair. You can install the solution on the local machine or cloud servers like AWS or Google Cloud. I would recommend Redis to other users. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
If you have a large amount of non-dynamic data that needs to be delivered to the client, you should use Redis. I don't think that it will support AI initiatives since it doesn't support continuous data. I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It's been very stable so far and performs well within our system. I would recommend it, but I would also highlight the cost factor as something to consider.
Redis is deployed on-cloud in our organization. When it started, Redis had a very simple structure, but now it has a lot of powerful data structures. Users should investigate because they can use other things for their data structure. Redis has more new use cases. Users must consider that Redis is single-threaded, which might take a toll on them when they write to Redis. This might be an issue if you need very high throughput with writes. Overall, I rate Redis a nine out of ten.
People using the solution should be aware of all the features of the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to those who extensively rely on read operations. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
I'd rate it an eight out of ten because it did what I needed, and it did a good job. However, currently, not every product in the Redis ecosystem has a great community or great support.