Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. I recommend using it, but it also depends on the needs and the budget. If I still had my company, I think we would continue using RSA enVision. However, my company now uses another solution and may prefer it because it's easier and automatically sends reports every month, requiring less maintenance effort. RSA enVision is different. It requires a different approach because you have to know exactly what you want to see in the logs and information. It's more oriented towards engineers who need to understand the product well and proactively find and predict attacks. The other approach, with the newer product, is more automated. The system does it by itself. Personally, I'm torn between both approaches. You should utilize automated systems but not fully trust them. You have to verify because I've learned from past experiences where systems have failed.
Cyber Security and Compliance Lead Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2023-05-04T09:21:00Z
May 4, 2023
If you have a relatively simple IT infrastructure, you can go for RSA enVision. Structure, like a hybrid cloud or Telco devices. r some Kubernetes-related things, microservice architecture, then you may consider other services. If you have a simple server or simple network device, you can go for other services. If you have budget issues, it's a good solution. Owing to its favorable pricing and the fact that its features will meet the minimum requirements of its user, I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
Chief Information Security Officer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-02-15T16:54:50Z
Feb 15, 2021
I still use this solution in my company every day but everything is out of date. I have learned how to write parsers. My recommendation to others is to be careful in the evaluation of SIEM solutions. There is no future for this solution. It does not exist anymore. I would rate RSA enVision a four out of ten.
Unit Manager - Application Integration and Framework Team at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-08-19T05:47:00Z
Aug 19, 2019
I would recommend this solution to somebody considering it. Deciding what to store on this solution is critical before implementing it. You should analyze the data and logs and decide what to store on the product. I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a ten because it needs better customization for integration. It takes time to implement.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, Splunk, NetWitness and others in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM). Updated: November 2024.
Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten. I recommend using it, but it also depends on the needs and the budget. If I still had my company, I think we would continue using RSA enVision. However, my company now uses another solution and may prefer it because it's easier and automatically sends reports every month, requiring less maintenance effort. RSA enVision is different. It requires a different approach because you have to know exactly what you want to see in the logs and information. It's more oriented towards engineers who need to understand the product well and proactively find and predict attacks. The other approach, with the newer product, is more automated. The system does it by itself. Personally, I'm torn between both approaches. You should utilize automated systems but not fully trust them. You have to verify because I've learned from past experiences where systems have failed.
If you have a relatively simple IT infrastructure, you can go for RSA enVision. Structure, like a hybrid cloud or Telco devices. r some Kubernetes-related things, microservice architecture, then you may consider other services. If you have a simple server or simple network device, you can go for other services. If you have budget issues, it's a good solution. Owing to its favorable pricing and the fact that its features will meet the minimum requirements of its user, I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.
I still use this solution in my company every day but everything is out of date. I have learned how to write parsers. My recommendation to others is to be careful in the evaluation of SIEM solutions. There is no future for this solution. It does not exist anymore. I would rate RSA enVision a four out of ten.
I would recommend this solution to somebody considering it. Deciding what to store on this solution is critical before implementing it. You should analyze the data and logs and decide what to store on the product. I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a ten because it needs better customization for integration. It takes time to implement.