I think a lot of organizations that deal with different projects use Spring MVC since it provides them with good features. Most of the projects that companies deal with are cloud-based ones, where Spring MVC plays an important role. Spring MVC is reliable and faster than other tools for developing any kind of application. I rate the overall solution a nine and a half out of ten.
Chief Technology Officer at Digital Solutions Expert
Real User
Top 20
2023-10-04T11:31:00Z
Oct 4, 2023
I did not have to ask for support because Spring has such a large community, and I always found solutions from different blogs. Besides, I used plain Java before getting acquainted with Spring Framework. Other MVC-equivalent languages, such as PHP, have the same principles. Spring Framework is just a different language. I rate Spring MVC a ten out of ten. Advising others to use Spring MVC depends on context because if you were part of a medium or large project, you would use an enterprise or widely adopted framework. If it's a medium or small project, you might use PHP or another similar framework like Laravel or Lumen.
I will recommend using the solution if you're looking for a reliable and feature-rich framework in Java. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It will give be a ten if they had more demos, workshops, and other learning resources.
Java Software Engineer (Future Innovator) at Telenor Microfinance Bank (TMB)
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-29T10:03:07Z
Mar 29, 2023
I rate Spring MVC nine out of 10. I recently recommended the solution to a friend in Pakistan who founded a digital ledger startup. I suggested using the Spring Fabric.
I give the solution a nine out of ten. Five programmers are required for the maintenance of the solution. For new users, I advise them to start with Spring Boot first before using Spring MVC.
I am an end-user. I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. It is already a lot better than how it was before. I'd rate it eight out of ten understanding that it still needs improvements here and there.
We would recommend that organizations ensure they have the native deployment tool available when implementing the solution. We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Technical Development Lead at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2022-05-18T14:14:19Z
May 18, 2022
Speaking from our own experience, Spring MVC has been one of the easiest frameworks to adopt. This is largely because Spring is based on the same MVC pattern as our legacy approaches to web application development and it has been a natural progression for us. Before adopting anything, you first need to know your requirements and then you need to read up about it (e.g. check the Internet). The same applies with Spring MVC. You should only adopt it if it suits your requirements. However, if you do decide to go with Spring, I can assure you that you won't regret it. It's a very good framework. I would rate Spring MVC a nine out of ten.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
MSP
Top 20
2022-04-06T13:04:58Z
Apr 6, 2022
I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. I would not recommend MVC. Rather, I would recommend the use of Spring Boot as Spring Boot also supports all the web services and has even more additional features. That, and it is easy to use. I'd rate MVC at a six out of ten.
Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-10-11T08:58:13Z
Oct 11, 2020
We're just customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate the solution at a nine. It's great. I enjoy using it and would recommend it to others. However, I've only really just started to use it over the past year or two and I have nothing to compare it to as I haven't tried out other solutions.
Spring MVC is a Java web framework built on the Servlet API and has been included in the Spring Framework from the very beginning. It handles web applications that use server-rendered HTML user interface, REST APIs, and much more. The documentation includes Spring MVC, View Technologies, CORS Support, and WebSocket Support.
For baseline information and compatibility with Servlet container and Java EE version ranges please visit the Spring...
I think a lot of organizations that deal with different projects use Spring MVC since it provides them with good features. Most of the projects that companies deal with are cloud-based ones, where Spring MVC plays an important role. Spring MVC is reliable and faster than other tools for developing any kind of application. I rate the overall solution a nine and a half out of ten.
I did not have to ask for support because Spring has such a large community, and I always found solutions from different blogs. Besides, I used plain Java before getting acquainted with Spring Framework. Other MVC-equivalent languages, such as PHP, have the same principles. Spring Framework is just a different language. I rate Spring MVC a ten out of ten. Advising others to use Spring MVC depends on context because if you were part of a medium or large project, you would use an enterprise or widely adopted framework. If it's a medium or small project, you might use PHP or another similar framework like Laravel or Lumen.
I will recommend using the solution if you're looking for a reliable and feature-rich framework in Java. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It will give be a ten if they had more demos, workshops, and other learning resources.
The solution is user-friendly and provides good documentation as well. I rate it an eight out of ten.
I rate Spring MVC nine out of 10. I recently recommended the solution to a friend in Pakistan who founded a digital ledger startup. I suggested using the Spring Fabric.
I give the solution a nine out of ten. Five programmers are required for the maintenance of the solution. For new users, I advise them to start with Spring Boot first before using Spring MVC.
I am an end-user. I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. It is already a lot better than how it was before. I'd rate it eight out of ten understanding that it still needs improvements here and there.
We would recommend that organizations ensure they have the native deployment tool available when implementing the solution. We would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
I rate Spring MVC an eight out of ten.
Speaking from our own experience, Spring MVC has been one of the easiest frameworks to adopt. This is largely because Spring is based on the same MVC pattern as our legacy approaches to web application development and it has been a natural progression for us. Before adopting anything, you first need to know your requirements and then you need to read up about it (e.g. check the Internet). The same applies with Spring MVC. You should only adopt it if it suits your requirements. However, if you do decide to go with Spring, I can assure you that you won't regret it. It's a very good framework. I would rate Spring MVC a nine out of ten.
I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.
I'm not sure which version of the solution I'm using. I would not recommend MVC. Rather, I would recommend the use of Spring Boot as Spring Boot also supports all the web services and has even more additional features. That, and it is easy to use. I'd rate MVC at a six out of ten.
We're just customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I'd rate the solution at a nine. It's great. I enjoy using it and would recommend it to others. However, I've only really just started to use it over the past year or two and I have nothing to compare it to as I haven't tried out other solutions.