CISO at a recruiting/HR firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
2024-05-01T06:45:00Z
May 1, 2024
If you have the right approach to resolving vulnerabilities, it is an extremely useful tool. It is not useful if you plan to just have it deployed and not take action on any of the vulnerabilities. I would rate Sysdig Secure a nine out of ten. If it has better reporting capabilities to visualize trends over time, it will be a more complete product.
I would offer the same advice to anyone considering a new product—always compare and weigh the pros and cons based on your specific use case. Overall, I would rate it 8 out of 10.
IT Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2023-05-01T13:27:00Z
May 1, 2023
It hasn't necessarily freed up time for me. I haven't noted any time to value yet. It's a good solution and better than the open source option I tested. I need more time to test and clarify the solution. While it is okay, I expect more from it. I'd like to have something that is out of the box. I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Cybersecurity Sales Specialist at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
Top 10
2023-03-28T17:19:21Z
Mar 28, 2023
I would tell those planning to use the solution that, from a container standpoint, it's excellent. If you're looking at it for other things, other vendors might be able to offer you better tools. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Top 10
2023-02-16T14:54:00Z
Feb 16, 2023
I definitely suggest Falco for the threat detection on Kubernetes, but Sysdig is a more enterprise solution because it can differ from customer to customer.
In the cloud, every second counts. Attacks move at warp speed, and security teams must protect the business without slowing it down. Sysdig stops cloud attacks in real time, instantly detecting changes in risk with runtime insights, a unique AI architecture, and open source Falco. Sysdig delivers live visibility by correlating signals across cloud workloads, identities, and services to uncover hidden attack paths. By knowing what is running, teams can prioritize the vulnerabilities,...
If you have the right approach to resolving vulnerabilities, it is an extremely useful tool. It is not useful if you plan to just have it deployed and not take action on any of the vulnerabilities. I would rate Sysdig Secure a nine out of ten. If it has better reporting capabilities to visualize trends over time, it will be a more complete product.
I rate Sysdig 8 out of 10. If you're looking for a Kubernetes security platform, Sysdig is the market leader.
I would offer the same advice to anyone considering a new product—always compare and weigh the pros and cons based on your specific use case. Overall, I would rate it 8 out of 10.
I would rate the product seven out of ten.
It hasn't necessarily freed up time for me. I haven't noted any time to value yet. It's a good solution and better than the open source option I tested. I need more time to test and clarify the solution. While it is okay, I expect more from it. I'd like to have something that is out of the box. I'd rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I would tell those planning to use the solution that, from a container standpoint, it's excellent. If you're looking at it for other things, other vendors might be able to offer you better tools. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
I definitely suggest Falco for the threat detection on Kubernetes, but Sysdig is a more enterprise solution because it can differ from customer to customer.