The overall product rating is six. I recommend considering it for a couple of weeks. As an IT consultant, I am familiar with the tool and its functionalities. You can keep my name anonymous in your records. However, as an employee, I am not positioned to serve as a reference to others. Vulcan can contact me if they have questions or comments about this review.
The solution is effective yet entails a significant learning curve for some users. It is quite effective once you learn to use the tool and queries. To a colleague, I would recommend giving the product a chance, as it is good. While the product does have issues scaling to our requirements, it is suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. We've noticed some discrepancies in recent data, such as incorrect dates and inactive CVEs being detected. This might be a result of Vulcan Cyber's acquisition by Tenable. The product provides good services and receives an eight out of ten rating overall. Maintenance-wise, validating data is time-consuming. Vulcan Cyber's role in making data-driven decisions still needs further investigation.
Vulcan, as it stands, is in the process of being acquired by Tenable. I am unsure of the plans beyond that. Nonetheless, it is a very good standalone product. It is easy to work with. The team is great. The product is very good based on other things I have seen so far. I would recommend it. It is a very good solution to centralize and dispatch everything regarding security vulnerabilities. I would rate Vulcan Cyber around eight out of ten.
We're waiting to see the benefits from Vulcan. We're still working through that. We have challenges in terms of automation. It doesn't quite do something the way we want in terms of our RFP. This is better than doing a DIY solution, however, it's not better than other products on the market right now. We haven't been able to reduce mean time to remediation due to issues with integration and duplication of issues, which creates confusion. Given that we are still experiencing duplicated assets, we do not have bidirectional information on actions going back and forth between our ticketing system and Vulcan. The fact that we cannot use it for our reporting leads me to rate it three out of ten. It is relatively straightforward to implement. I recommend thinking about how you are going to structure your business groups, whether on a business unit approach or an operational remediation approach since they are quite different. This can create some confusion when trying to drill down and create specific reports for specific teams. We are fortunate that the business groups allow us to tag or customize assets within Vulcan, which is quite useful. We struggled a bit initially with getting feedback on best practices from Vulcan, and some real-world examples would have really helped. If you are an organization with many thousand endpoints, it would be beneficial to understand how others have structured it by business units, operational units, or teams to get the best value out of the business grouping and the automation you can achieve from that.
To someone who needs a vulnerability risk management solution but is considering a DIY approach, I would recommend taking help from a platform like Vulcan Cyber or any other vulnerability management tool. Do not go to Vulcan Cyber directly. First, gain exposure to a vulnerability management tool. Once knowledgeable, then opt for a reporting tool like Vulcan Cyber. Utilizing this combined knowledge will make Vulcan Cyber more understandable. Directly using Vulcan Cyber might not be clear for some people. I would recommend Vulcan Cyber to other users, provided they improve the performance speed. I would definitely recommend it to those in need of a reporting tool. Overall, I would rate Vulcan Cyber an eight out of ten.
It is a new tool for us. We have to go through a bit of training. It took some time to get used to the tool and understand exactly what its capabilities are and what information it provides. It took a bit of time to assess how we could utilize the tool better. There is still much more to learn, but in the short time that we have spent with it, it gives us a good overview of what our assets are and how we can assess the vulnerabilities and manage threats. I would recommend Vulcan Cyber for its ability to provide a good overview of assets and their vulnerabilities. It is overall a good product. A DIY approach is feasible if one has strong technical skills for vulnerability risk management, but if you are looking for a more scalable solution, Vulcan Cyber is a good one. It helps quite a lot to have a good overview of the assets and the vulnerability of the particular assets. I would rate Vulcan Cyber an eight out of ten.
To a colleague who needs a vulnerability risk management solution but is considering a DIY approach, I would say that the effort needed to implement something similar to Vulcan is not worth it when you have this kind of tool in the market, especially when you know that they offer a lot of different innovations for automation. They can help reduce the cost of person-hours that you spend with your team working on solving or patching different assets. You can use those hours or that effort to increase the patching talents in your company or create better policies for patching. I would rate Vulcan Cyber a nine out of ten.
Vulcan Cyber is used by leading cyber security organizations to manage exposure risk created by unmitigated infrastructure, application, code and cloud vulnerabilities.
The Vulcan Cyber ExposureOS starts by correlating and normalizing risk and asset data aggregated from hundreds of vulnerability scanners, asset repositories and threat intelligence feeds. These signals are then used to create a singular view of your organization's attack surfaces to make exposure risk and vulnerability...
The overall product rating is six. I recommend considering it for a couple of weeks. As an IT consultant, I am familiar with the tool and its functionalities. You can keep my name anonymous in your records. However, as an employee, I am not positioned to serve as a reference to others. Vulcan can contact me if they have questions or comments about this review.
The solution is effective yet entails a significant learning curve for some users. It is quite effective once you learn to use the tool and queries. To a colleague, I would recommend giving the product a chance, as it is good. While the product does have issues scaling to our requirements, it is suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. We've noticed some discrepancies in recent data, such as incorrect dates and inactive CVEs being detected. This might be a result of Vulcan Cyber's acquisition by Tenable. The product provides good services and receives an eight out of ten rating overall. Maintenance-wise, validating data is time-consuming. Vulcan Cyber's role in making data-driven decisions still needs further investigation.
Vulcan, as it stands, is in the process of being acquired by Tenable. I am unsure of the plans beyond that. Nonetheless, it is a very good standalone product. It is easy to work with. The team is great. The product is very good based on other things I have seen so far. I would recommend it. It is a very good solution to centralize and dispatch everything regarding security vulnerabilities. I would rate Vulcan Cyber around eight out of ten.
We're waiting to see the benefits from Vulcan. We're still working through that. We have challenges in terms of automation. It doesn't quite do something the way we want in terms of our RFP. This is better than doing a DIY solution, however, it's not better than other products on the market right now. We haven't been able to reduce mean time to remediation due to issues with integration and duplication of issues, which creates confusion. Given that we are still experiencing duplicated assets, we do not have bidirectional information on actions going back and forth between our ticketing system and Vulcan. The fact that we cannot use it for our reporting leads me to rate it three out of ten. It is relatively straightforward to implement. I recommend thinking about how you are going to structure your business groups, whether on a business unit approach or an operational remediation approach since they are quite different. This can create some confusion when trying to drill down and create specific reports for specific teams. We are fortunate that the business groups allow us to tag or customize assets within Vulcan, which is quite useful. We struggled a bit initially with getting feedback on best practices from Vulcan, and some real-world examples would have really helped. If you are an organization with many thousand endpoints, it would be beneficial to understand how others have structured it by business units, operational units, or teams to get the best value out of the business grouping and the automation you can achieve from that.
To someone who needs a vulnerability risk management solution but is considering a DIY approach, I would recommend taking help from a platform like Vulcan Cyber or any other vulnerability management tool. Do not go to Vulcan Cyber directly. First, gain exposure to a vulnerability management tool. Once knowledgeable, then opt for a reporting tool like Vulcan Cyber. Utilizing this combined knowledge will make Vulcan Cyber more understandable. Directly using Vulcan Cyber might not be clear for some people. I would recommend Vulcan Cyber to other users, provided they improve the performance speed. I would definitely recommend it to those in need of a reporting tool. Overall, I would rate Vulcan Cyber an eight out of ten.
It is a new tool for us. We have to go through a bit of training. It took some time to get used to the tool and understand exactly what its capabilities are and what information it provides. It took a bit of time to assess how we could utilize the tool better. There is still much more to learn, but in the short time that we have spent with it, it gives us a good overview of what our assets are and how we can assess the vulnerabilities and manage threats. I would recommend Vulcan Cyber for its ability to provide a good overview of assets and their vulnerabilities. It is overall a good product. A DIY approach is feasible if one has strong technical skills for vulnerability risk management, but if you are looking for a more scalable solution, Vulcan Cyber is a good one. It helps quite a lot to have a good overview of the assets and the vulnerability of the particular assets. I would rate Vulcan Cyber an eight out of ten.
To a colleague who needs a vulnerability risk management solution but is considering a DIY approach, I would say that the effort needed to implement something similar to Vulcan is not worth it when you have this kind of tool in the market, especially when you know that they offer a lot of different innovations for automation. They can help reduce the cost of person-hours that you spend with your team working on solving or patching different assets. You can use those hours or that effort to increase the patching talents in your company or create better policies for patching. I would rate Vulcan Cyber a nine out of ten.