First, it's important for organizations to thoroughly understand Bastion. When considering a PAM solution, they should start by outlining their specific scenarios and objectives. They should find the best solution that closely aligns with their needs. This process involves creating a detailed RFP. When comparing different solutions, they should ensure that at least 80% of their requirements are met by some of the options available. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Senior Manager, Infra Reliability at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-05-10T12:45:44Z
May 10, 2024
We restrict access to specific users. When users access, we record the sessions, and people are aware that the sessions are being recorded. The tool requires very low maintenance and can build a resilient environment. However, sometimes, some weird stuff happens because of probably some updates as it's running on a Linux kernel. The solution's reporting is fine but not great. For its reporting and alerting features, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend WALLIX Bastion to people who want to restrict access. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. It's a very dependable and reliable PAM solution that will give them what they need. It's also cost-effective, being a one-off solution with only maintenance subscription fees. If I were to recommend a PAM solution to any organization, WALLIX Bastion would be at the top of my list.
IT Security Engineer at a cloud solution provider with self employed
Real User
2022-07-01T10:07:32Z
Jul 1, 2022
WALLIX Bastion is a great solution that evolves with new features, unlike competitors like CyberArk. I would give WALLIX Bastion a rating of eight out of ten.
RSSI at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-03-02T19:25:16Z
Mar 2, 2021
I wouldn't advise others to start with a huge license. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of seven. There are some features we have not tested yet like two-factor authentication. If I had, maybe I could give it a higher rating. For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself. If you don't size it properly, it will be very difficult to handle. We bought our licenses based on the number of devices that we can manage, but it seems like we have a limitation on the number of people that can gain access, which has been pretty difficult to handle.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I would warn others that are implementing the solution that they should never upgrade Wallix through their interface. It will crash. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
First, it's important for organizations to thoroughly understand Bastion. When considering a PAM solution, they should start by outlining their specific scenarios and objectives. They should find the best solution that closely aligns with their needs. This process involves creating a detailed RFP. When comparing different solutions, they should ensure that at least 80% of their requirements are met by some of the options available. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
We restrict access to specific users. When users access, we record the sessions, and people are aware that the sessions are being recorded. The tool requires very low maintenance and can build a resilient environment. However, sometimes, some weird stuff happens because of probably some updates as it's running on a Linux kernel. The solution's reporting is fine but not great. For its reporting and alerting features, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I would recommend WALLIX Bastion to people who want to restrict access. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. It's a very dependable and reliable PAM solution that will give them what they need. It's also cost-effective, being a one-off solution with only maintenance subscription fees. If I were to recommend a PAM solution to any organization, WALLIX Bastion would be at the top of my list.
I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.
I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
WALLIX Bastion is a great solution that evolves with new features, unlike competitors like CyberArk. I would give WALLIX Bastion a rating of eight out of ten.
I would definitely recommend this solution. On a scale from one to ten, I would WALLIX Bastion an eight.
I wouldn't advise others to start with a huge license. Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of seven. There are some features we have not tested yet like two-factor authentication. If I had, maybe I could give it a higher rating. For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself. If you don't size it properly, it will be very difficult to handle. We bought our licenses based on the number of devices that we can manage, but it seems like we have a limitation on the number of people that can gain access, which has been pretty difficult to handle.
We use the on-premises deployment model. I would warn others that are implementing the solution that they should never upgrade Wallix through their interface. It will crash. I would rate the solution nine out of ten.