Yes, I would recommend WebInspect. It is a good product, comparable to AppScan. It is quite scalable, and good cost/value with the support and backing from Micro Focus. It's good and I definitely recommend it. On a scale of one to ten, I would give it an eight.
Senior Software Developer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-11-14T06:33:00Z
Nov 14, 2019
We're using the public cloud deployment model. Our provider is Microsoft. We just chose the solutions for dynamic scanning and static scanning, but we haven't performed any scanning yet. I'd recommend it; I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
Information Security Architect at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-06-24T12:13:00Z
Jun 24, 2019
I am currently evolving, going through the product. We have yet to go through all the features and functionalities of the product. The way it checks for vulnerabilities helps a lot. It makes the most of the check for vulnerabilities. The centralized dashboard for the management is good but I'm still looking into it. That and other features we are yet to be discovered. I'm still trying to get to know all the features. Looking at an enterprise level product is good. With it, you get a centralized board, you have a management view, enroll management and access management. Everything is there. But still, check your requirements, what you need. If you use it for a certain amount of applications, you might not need such a heavy tool. Our requirement is 10 or 20 times more than a regular company and hence we went with an enterprise solution and had somebody who could implement this. If your requirement is a little less, it might just call for some other scanners based on your requirements. If you do need such an extensive requirement, ensure that you also have the data servers and systems for such tools. It will be easy to implement in any environment if you do. I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.
Fortify WebInspect is an automated DAST solution that helps security professionals and QA testers uncover security vulnerabilities and configuration concerns by providing complete vulnerability detection. This is accomplished by mimicking real-world external security attacks on a live application in order to discover and prioritize concerns for root-cause study. Fortify WebInspect provides a number of REST APIs for easier integration, as well as the ability to be maintained via an intuitive...
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Yes, I would recommend WebInspect. It is a good product, comparable to AppScan. It is quite scalable, and good cost/value with the support and backing from Micro Focus. It's good and I definitely recommend it. On a scale of one to ten, I would give it an eight.
We're using the public cloud deployment model. Our provider is Microsoft. We just chose the solutions for dynamic scanning and static scanning, but we haven't performed any scanning yet. I'd recommend it; I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
I am currently evolving, going through the product. We have yet to go through all the features and functionalities of the product. The way it checks for vulnerabilities helps a lot. It makes the most of the check for vulnerabilities. The centralized dashboard for the management is good but I'm still looking into it. That and other features we are yet to be discovered. I'm still trying to get to know all the features. Looking at an enterprise level product is good. With it, you get a centralized board, you have a management view, enroll management and access management. Everything is there. But still, check your requirements, what you need. If you use it for a certain amount of applications, you might not need such a heavy tool. Our requirement is 10 or 20 times more than a regular company and hence we went with an enterprise solution and had somebody who could implement this. If your requirement is a little less, it might just call for some other scanners based on your requirements. If you do need such an extensive requirement, ensure that you also have the data servers and systems for such tools. It will be easy to implement in any environment if you do. I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.
Currently, I'm satisfied with the solution. I would rate this product a 7 out of 10.