Wordpress Developer & AWS Solution Architect at Seahorse Data
Real User
Top 5
2024-09-23T11:45:00Z
Sep 23, 2024
I haven't compared pricing with other solutions, so I can't comment on it. Usually, it depends on the number of files you are uploading and the resources you are distributing. It is a pay-as-you-go model.
I used to work with AWS and Azure, and we provided cost comparisons for customers to help them choose the right services. Azure tends to be more user-friendly and easier to understand, while AWS may take more time.
For CloudFront, I'm quite satisfied with the pricing. Initially, it doesn't require many resources for this specific solution. Additionally, the pay-as-you-go model with a generous free tier makes it easy to onboard and pay for what you use. This is a big advantage for SMEs, making it very convenient.
The product could improve its price. People using the product must pay attention to what they are setting up. The cost can greatly increase if they do not take care of it.
I believe the solution is more expensive. Amazon's pricing varies depending on the data transfer. The cost depends on how much data is transmitted from that particular CloudFront. The cost is lower if we are located in America and hosted in America.
Amazon CloudFront is a global content delivery network (CDN) service that accelerates delivery of your websites, APIs, video content or other web assets. It integrates with other Amazon Web Services products to give developers and businesses an easy way to accelerate content to end users with no minimum usage commitments. Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including...
CloudFront is relatively cheap and worth the money.
I haven't compared pricing with other solutions, so I can't comment on it. Usually, it depends on the number of files you are uploading and the resources you are distributing. It is a pay-as-you-go model.
I used to work with AWS and Azure, and we provided cost comparisons for customers to help them choose the right services. Azure tends to be more user-friendly and easier to understand, while AWS may take more time.
The pricing structure is complicated.
We have private pricing on AWS. We get a fifty percent discount.
I rate the product’s pricing a six to seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
For CloudFront, I'm quite satisfied with the pricing. Initially, it doesn't require many resources for this specific solution. Additionally, the pay-as-you-go model with a generous free tier makes it easy to onboard and pay for what you use. This is a big advantage for SMEs, making it very convenient.
The solution’s price is reasonable. It is much more reasonable than Akamai.
The product could improve its price. People using the product must pay attention to what they are setting up. The cost can greatly increase if they do not take care of it.
I rate Amazon CloudFront's pricing a five out of ten.
I believe the solution is more expensive. Amazon's pricing varies depending on the data transfer. The cost depends on how much data is transmitted from that particular CloudFront. The cost is lower if we are located in America and hosted in America.
Its price is really on the high side. It should be cheaper in general.