The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective.
It's not that expensive. We just have to store the image there, and the cost is based on monthly storage. For storing around 200 to 300 megabytes per month, it costs around $10 only, so it's not that expensive.
My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money.
The Container Registry solutions are designed for managing, storing, and securing container images. These registries serve as pivotal elements in the deployment pipelines of modern software development, especially in environments leveraging microservices architecture and containerization technologies like Docker and Kubernetes.
The pricing of ECR is average compared to its competitors.
The product is expensive.
The solution's pricing depends upon the region. The solution's prices are high in India as compared to the US.
The main difference between Amazon ECR and other solutions, like Google Kubernetes Engine, is that I haven't personally used GKE. However, I know that GKE costs around $60 per month, which is quite cost-effective.
Amazon ECR does not have a high cost.
It's not that expensive. We just have to store the image there, and the cost is based on monthly storage. For storing around 200 to 300 megabytes per month, it costs around $10 only, so it's not that expensive.
The solution's price is reasonable compared to Google and Azure.
My company currently has Amazon ECR under the pay-as-you-go model. The tool is more affordable than Azure Container Registry, and it's worth the money.