Compared to others, Amazon seems efficient and is considered good for Big Data workloads. Costs are involved based on cluster resources, data volumes, EC2 ( /products/amazon-ec2-reviews ) instances, instance sizes, Kubernetes ( /products/kubernetes-reviews ), Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) services, storage, and data transfers. Cost optimization can be achieved through instance usage, cluster sharing, and auto-scaling.
I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million.
You only pay for the EC2 fees for Amazon EMR. The number of clusters you launch and the time you use them determine the fee. There is no additional license fee, as Amazon EMR is a fully managed service. You can use any open-source software that is compatible with it. There is no need to pay extra for third-party software.
Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR) is a web service that makes it easy to quickly and cost-effectively process vast amounts of data. Amazon EMR simplifies big data processing, providing a managed Hadoop framework that makes it easy, fast, and cost-effective for you to distribute and process vast amounts of your data across dynamically scalable Amazon EC2 instances.
I would rate the price for Amazon EMR, where one is high and ten is low, as a good one.
Compared to others, Amazon seems efficient and is considered good for Big Data workloads. Costs are involved based on cluster resources, data volumes, EC2 ( /products/amazon-ec2-reviews ) instances, instance sizes, Kubernetes ( /products/kubernetes-reviews ), Docker ( /products/docker-37146-reviews ) services, storage, and data transfers. Cost optimization can be achieved through instance usage, cluster sharing, and auto-scaling.
The cost of Amazon EMR is a little bit expensive, especially considering the support package, which includes a gold package.
I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million.
Amazon EMR is not very expensive.
You only pay for the EC2 fees for Amazon EMR. The number of clusters you launch and the time you use them determine the fee. There is no additional license fee, as Amazon EMR is a fully managed service. You can use any open-source software that is compatible with it. There is no need to pay extra for third-party software.
There is a small fee for the EMR system, but the major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources that we actually use.
Amazon EMR's price is reasonable.
The licensing costs are expensive. I rate them a seven out of ten, with one being the least expensive and ten being the most expensive.
I cannot comment on licensing costs as I don't know the prices.
I'm not sure about to cost of the licensing. However, it does depend on the integration, for example, and many other factors.
The price can get a bit high. We're looking for ways to reduce costs. Right now it costs us between $40,000 and $50,000 a month.
The cost of Amazon EMR is very high.
You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances.
The price of the solution may be a bit more than other competitors, such as Microsoft.