Associate Director - Technical at NorthBay Solutions
MSP
Top 20
2024-12-11T04:29:00Z
Dec 11, 2024
The pricing is very good because it is low and there is no management cost. You do not need to hire any system administrator to manage your Active Directory.
Head of IT/Cloud Infrastructure Architect at Crown Interactive Limited
Real User
2021-12-28T19:03:51Z
Dec 28, 2021
AWS' pricing is fair, and costs can be cut if you look carefully at when you're using it. They accept upfront and non-upfront payments, with upfront payments being lower. However, it can be a little difficult to figure out pricing if you're working with an exchange rate.
Senior Infrastructure Reliability Engineer - (Remote) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2021-12-07T19:53:24Z
Dec 7, 2021
The pricing depends because with AWS there are two types of directory objects: 30,000 and 500,000. It varies. AWS provides the pricing calculators so we can get an estimate from there as per the company requirement of how many users and objects that we need to create. So we can go to that portal, put in the data, and get the quotation. There are no extra licensing fees. It's all included.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, Okta and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). Updated: March 2025.
As you pay monthly, I'd say the toughest part is getting management to understand the differences in cost. When they start seeing that monthly cost, they start to freak out. You have to remind them that they didn't put out millions for the CapEx cost. It's harder for them to grasp the cost. It's pretty pricey. There's no doubt about it. However, in enclosed containerized instances in, for example, an HPE GreenLake framework with the frame internalized inside of the client environment, it's not nearly as expensive. The pricing is convoluted. I would prefer it if all cloud solutions come up with better modeling. I know it's difficult to come up with an all-in-one cost, mainly due to the variance in the environments. I understand that. However, they need to centralize their cost a whole lot more.
Identity and Access Management as a Service provides scalable and secure access control for businesses, allowing for centralized authentication and simplified user management across networks.IDaaS solutions offer cloud-based identity management for enterprises, supporting single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and directory integration. Users report improved compliance and security management due to centralized policy enforcement, reducing administrative overhead.What are key features...
The pricing is very good because it is low and there is no management cost. You do not need to hire any system administrator to manage your Active Directory.
The solution is priced reasonably.
We pay an annual subscription fee.
It is important to note that there are no hidden fees following initial purchase.
AWS' pricing is fair, and costs can be cut if you look carefully at when you're using it. They accept upfront and non-upfront payments, with upfront payments being lower. However, it can be a little difficult to figure out pricing if you're working with an exchange rate.
The pricing depends because with AWS there are two types of directory objects: 30,000 and 500,000. It varies. AWS provides the pricing calculators so we can get an estimate from there as per the company requirement of how many users and objects that we need to create. So we can go to that portal, put in the data, and get the quotation. There are no extra licensing fees. It's all included.
As you pay monthly, I'd say the toughest part is getting management to understand the differences in cost. When they start seeing that monthly cost, they start to freak out. You have to remind them that they didn't put out millions for the CapEx cost. It's harder for them to grasp the cost. It's pretty pricey. There's no doubt about it. However, in enclosed containerized instances in, for example, an HPE GreenLake framework with the frame internalized inside of the client environment, it's not nearly as expensive. The pricing is convoluted. I would prefer it if all cloud solutions come up with better modeling. I know it's difficult to come up with an all-in-one cost, mainly due to the variance in the environments. I understand that. However, they need to centralize their cost a whole lot more.
The pricing is reasonable.