The pricing depends on your use case. We're using the free tier. However, for paid plans, we were paying about ten dollars per user. It tracks user activity for billing purposes. If a user wasn't active during the month, we didn't pay for that user.
Senior DevOps Engineer at a newspaper with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-06-25T13:19:08Z
Jun 25, 2024
The solution's price model is per-user based. Since you're building your own agents, you only have to pay for the SaaS subscription, which is the user model. The solution's per-user pricing model suits huge enterprises but is expensive for small to medium businesses.
Senior Engineering Consultant at ASSURANCE IQ, INC.
Real User
Top 5
2024-06-24T07:45:01Z
Jun 24, 2024
I don't think the tool is expensive. I don't know the exact price of the tool, but if it was costly, my company would have stopped it because we switched to Splunk previously due to pricing reasons. Some other tools were also switched with other products, so I don't think billing was easy for us.
Buildkite is known to be cheaper than GitHub Workflows, which is considered a standard in the industry. It can be cost-effective, especially for organizations that heavily utilize Docker and containerization, because every code change triggers a new build. Its integration with AWS, particularly with ECR, and its caching capabilities with layers are powerful features.
Buildkite is a powerful CI/CD tool praised for its scalability and flexibility in automating and managing complex workflows across multiple platforms. Its integration capabilities with various systems and supports for secure, customizable environments enhance development efficiency and data privacy. The feedback highlights significant boosts in productivity and operational cost reduction, making Buildkite a strategic asset for businesses aiming to streamline development tasks and align with...
The pricing depends on your use case. We're using the free tier. However, for paid plans, we were paying about ten dollars per user. It tracks user activity for billing purposes. If a user wasn't active during the month, we didn't pay for that user.
The solution's price model is per-user based. Since you're building your own agents, you only have to pay for the SaaS subscription, which is the user model. The solution's per-user pricing model suits huge enterprises but is expensive for small to medium businesses.
I don't think the tool is expensive. I don't know the exact price of the tool, but if it was costly, my company would have stopped it because we switched to Splunk previously due to pricing reasons. Some other tools were also switched with other products, so I don't think billing was easy for us.
We are using the free version of the solution.
Buildkite is known to be cheaper than GitHub Workflows, which is considered a standard in the industry. It can be cost-effective, especially for organizations that heavily utilize Docker and containerization, because every code change triggers a new build. Its integration with AWS, particularly with ECR, and its caching capabilities with layers are powerful features.
We used the solution’s free version.