Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us. However, a startup may face some issues with the solution's pricing.
Chief Operating Officer at Integra Micro Software Services, Bangalore
Real User
Top 5
2023-07-03T07:12:52Z
Jul 3, 2023
One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now. We have not gone much deeper into the pricing part right now, but I can speak on this maybe after the quarter, maybe the end of September.
Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay. However, the cost is variable. And, if used properly, I believe it is rather inexpensive. If you use it badly, you must pay. If one is very cheap, and five is very expensive, I would rate the pricing a two out of five.
I would rate the pricing 4 out of 5. So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing.
Line Technical Agent at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-07-05T15:50:32Z
Jul 5, 2020
We are using the open source version, so there's been no need to build anything ourselves. We do not have a lot of casual issues, and, compared to other solutions like AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic, it's much cheaper. The costs are very, very affordable.
Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.
Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data...
Elastic Observability is cheaper in terms of pricing.
It is expensive. It is not cheap. We only use the monitoring part.
I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is not that cheap.
The product’s pricing needs improvement. It is expensive compared to Grafana.
We will buy a premium license after POC.
Since we are a huge company, Elastic Observability is an affordable solution for us. However, a startup may face some issues with the solution's pricing.
One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now. We have not gone much deeper into the pricing part right now, but I can speak on this maybe after the quarter, maybe the end of September.
Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions.
The price of Elastic Observability is expensive. I rate the price of Elastic Observability an eight out of ten.
Licensing costs are reasonable and we definitely get our money's worth.
Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay. However, the cost is variable. And, if used properly, I believe it is rather inexpensive. If you use it badly, you must pay. If one is very cheap, and five is very expensive, I would rate the pricing a two out of five.
I would rate the pricing 4 out of 5. So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing.
I don't have any details in terms of pricing. It's not an aspect of the solution I am familiar with.
We are using the open source version, so there's been no need to build anything ourselves. We do not have a lot of casual issues, and, compared to other solutions like AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic, it's much cheaper. The costs are very, very affordable.