The solution is not that expensive compared to Zscaler. Netskope is between Forcepoint CASB and Zscaler in terms of cost. Forcepoint CASB would be the first choice because it negotiates well and offers a perpetual license, though it may seem subscription-based. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
The solution is a medium-expensive product. Basically, it's not the most expensive, however, it's not the cheapest. It's medium, let's say. Palo Alto is a little bit more expensive, yet a much better product. For example, Zscaler is a little bit more expensive. Zscaler enforces the CASB policies at the same place, as the Secure Web Gateway forces them.
Regional Solutions Manager (Sub-Sahara Africa) at Infodata
Real User
2022-05-29T12:53:00Z
May 29, 2022
The cost is moderate. It's not cheap and it's not really expensive. It actually helps us achieve what we want to achieve. The cost is a commercial rate however, we get the value of it. The cost is around $100 per user per year.
Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-01-06T08:53:42Z
Jan 6, 2021
The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment. If you are a large business customer, it may be overpriced but different smaller enterprises have found it not too expensive. However, I think the cost could be a little cheaper.
Forcepoint CASB (Cloud Access Security Broker) is a security solution which is designed to secure and monitor the use of cloud services within an organization. It helps organizations gain visibility and control over the cloud applications and services being used by their employees. Forcepoint CASB integrates with cloud service providers' APIs and employs various techniques such as traffic analysis, proxying, and API-based controls to provide security and visibility into cloud application...
The solution is not that expensive compared to Zscaler. Netskope is between Forcepoint CASB and Zscaler in terms of cost. Forcepoint CASB would be the first choice because it negotiates well and offers a perpetual license, though it may seem subscription-based. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
It gives you value for your investment, but it doesn't contribute. So, I would rate it as an eight.
Licensing costs are pretty reasonable, especially when compared to the vendor that we switched from. I
The solution is a medium-expensive product. Basically, it's not the most expensive, however, it's not the cheapest. It's medium, let's say. Palo Alto is a little bit more expensive, yet a much better product. For example, Zscaler is a little bit more expensive. Zscaler enforces the CASB policies at the same place, as the Secure Web Gateway forces them.
The cost is moderate. It's not cheap and it's not really expensive. It actually helps us achieve what we want to achieve. The cost is a commercial rate however, we get the value of it. The cost is around $100 per user per year.
The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment. If you are a large business customer, it may be overpriced but different smaller enterprises have found it not too expensive. However, I think the cost could be a little cheaper.