What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?

I've heard from my manager that the solution is expensive.

The solution is available at a highly affordable price. Competitor solutions, such as Cisco's, are more expensive than Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. The licensing cost of the solution varies from company to company, government organizations can procure the solution at a lower price in comparison to other private institutions such as banks. Approximately, the license of the product for 100 endpoints will cost $35 for government institutions and $25 for private companies. The standard or basic license of the tool costs about $15 a year. For installation and technical support there are additional charges on top of the standard licensing fees for the product.

Pricing is very reasonable for a small companies. It cost around 64 dollars.

The pricing is good. It has a monthly subscription. I rate the product’s pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

The solution is comparatively priced.

The tool is expensive.

The pricing is in the middle. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap. There are no additional costs to the standard license.

We purchase the software’s yearly license. It includes support and maintenance updates. The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products.

The solution's pricing is acceptable.

I would rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten. You need to pay extra costs for additional modules. The product's licensing costs are yearly.

The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee.

The price of this solution is affordable and there is only a standard license required.

Licensing fees are expensive. Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

The solution is growing more expensive and it's becoming an issue.

The cost of a Kaspersky enterprise license comes out to about $18,000 annually.

The licensing is affordable. We bought a three-year license. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard license fees.

I don't remember exactly what the licenses cost, but it's not too expensive. It's affordable, especially when you are dealing with on-prem. However, I don't know about the new prices because we are in the process of buying support. We've owned the license for a long time, and we are now bringing in the support, so we are not paying much for this. Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license. That would save the customers from having to do lots of implementations. As far as I know, they do not have a bundled license.

We pay a yearly licensing fee. This product costs less than our past solution, ESET.

For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription.

Yearly licenses are available.

Kaspersky requires a license. I don't remember how much it costs exactly, but it's charged per appliance.

We have approximately 700 licenses for this solution and we pay annually.

We pay for licensing yearly.

It's costly and heavy. Price-wise, it's expensive. In order to use the EDR, you must have a very strong server as well. So that's where you have to add the cost for the server machines, and that's where you implement the EDR as well. While the EDR itself is probably not that expensive, altogether, with the servers needed, it becomes a costly solution. Users need to pay a yearly licensing fee.

The price is reasonable. We evaluated some other vendors, but Kaspersky charges less and offers more.

I prefer paying for a yearly license because it has some discounts. One of the companies I work for pays for the Business Select license, for 100 users.

We have a yearly license with Kaspersky currently. It has already gotten renewed after its first expiry. We will renew it. When we renew it, we tend to make sure it's also as up-to-date as possible.

We pay for licensing annually.

There is an annual license required to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

Kaspersky pricing is reasonable. If you compare it to other top brands such as Symantec and McAfee, Kaspersky costs 30-40% less.

There is an annual license required.

The solution requires a license and there are different license packages depending on the number of users you need.

The licensing is yearly based. It is expensive, it could be cheaper, so I think the solution's pricing could be better.

This solution is priced lower than some of its competitors. Kaspersky has introduced new products and upgraded versions of Endpoint Security. It is a bit complicated these days, especially their licensing. They are promoting customers to purchase the EDR, Endpoint Detection and Response, rather than going for the Endpoint Security only. The EDR requirement for deployment is a little higher, especially for mid-size or small-size companies. The server they require for the EDR or sandboxing is pretty heavy and costly. If they can reduce the price, then it would have been a good cloud solution. The support from Kaspersky is purchased separately.

We pay a yearly annual subscription for this product.

The solution can be a bit expensive.

You do have to pay for a license. We pay a yearly licensing fee. I can't speak to the exact cost, however.

We have an annual license and there is a fee per device used. The price is fair compared to the latest EDR solution.

Licensing fees are paid annually.

We have a yearly license, and the pricing is fine.

As my role is limited to that of support, I cannot conjecture as to the prices.

I think the price of this solution is good.

The price of the solution is reasonable. It is less costly compared to competitors.

Licensing is on a yearly basis. We have a three-year license.

There is a license required for this solution and we have 1,800 licenses. The cost is a bit high and we are looking for an alternative.

The solution can be a bit pricy. Especially if you have to cover many devices, it can get expensive. The price compounds.

The licensing cost can be about $1,300 per year.

At the time, when we purchased the solution, the company was giving us the best deal on the market. It's the reason why we ended up choosing it. I don't recall the licensing aspects or if we had to pay for it, and if so, how much.

As an end-user, I am not aware of the costs of the licensing policies. I'm not on the commercial negotiation side of the licenses. There is someone else in the company that handles those details.

We pay a yearly licensing fee.

We pay a licensing fee on a yearly basis.

I find the solution to be inexpensive compared to other solution like Crowdstrike.

Its price is on par with other products. It might even be slightly cheaper. There are no additional costs.

The cost structure is very reasonable. It's not overly expensive, which is part of the draw of the solution.

We have been using a yearly subscription and feel that pricing could be better. Perhaps, discounts could be given, during the renewal process, to those who have been customers for some time.

It's an affordable security solution.

Our license is a paid license which we pay annually. Every year we have been renewing the licenses. I don't have any issues with the price. I think the pricing is fair.

We deploy the solution annually.

We buy individual licenses per machine. Typically, they come as cards with serial numbers that we scratch off and enter onto our machines.

Licensing costs are on a yearly basis.

Kaspersky is priced well. I would say that the prices are relatively cheap.

Pricing and licensing is good.