I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business version.
Information Security Manager at ITC SOLUCIONES TECNOLOGICAS S.A.S
Real User
2022-04-27T08:19:36Z
Apr 27, 2022
Kiuwan is not as expensive as the other solutions. We pay according to the number of lines of code that have been hired to scan, whether it scans or not. That's the downside.
We can likely find free open-source solutions that give us close to the quality we get with this solution. We'd rather not pay if we don't have to. Customers must pay a yearly licensing fee.
Test Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2020-11-19T16:01:57Z
Nov 19, 2020
I don't handle the payments or licensing aspects of the solution, therefore, I can't speak to the exact cost of the product. I only administer the tool. That said, it's my understanding that, if you need to analyze more, you do need to pay more for the solution.
Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.
We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.
I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business version.
Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use.
Kiuwan is not as expensive as the other solutions. We pay according to the number of lines of code that have been hired to scan, whether it scans or not. That's the downside.
We can likely find free open-source solutions that give us close to the quality we get with this solution. We'd rather not pay if we don't have to. Customers must pay a yearly licensing fee.
It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle.
I don't handle the payments or licensing aspects of the solution, therefore, I can't speak to the exact cost of the product. I only administer the tool. That said, it's my understanding that, if you need to analyze more, you do need to pay more for the solution.
With this solution you only pay for the total amount of lines of code and it's a reasonable cost.
This solution is cheaper than other tools.