Loadbalancer is expensive. At Globo, it is probably the most expensive tool we use. Annually, we are paying more than $1 million. I think the price is fair because we are heavy users that put on massive events that are on TV and streamed on the internet.
The solution requires an annual support license that includes software upgrades and support. Compared to other devices in our network, the solution is quite affordable.
Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-07-06T15:05:15Z
Jul 6, 2022
I have a rough idea of the cost. However, I don’t generally handle licensing details. I’m not sure, for example, if support is included or an extra cost. I’d rate it a four out of five in terms of affordability, with five being the most expensive.
Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, with additional costs, however, in some cases, the price remains the same. It is dependent on the customer and what discounts F5 has given. Loadbalancer.org is based on open-source products, but it requires money for support and other activities.
IT Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
2018-02-28T07:44:00Z
Feb 28, 2018
Pricing is great. I couldn't really complain about it. It's all good. They're not the cheapest, not the most expensive, but I think value-wise, they're 100%.
Loadbalancer.org is a versatile solution that offers load balancing for small businesses, multiple instances of applications, web application firewall, publishing Windows and SQL applications, and security for telephone service systems. It is easy to use, cost-effective, and performs well with low latency.
The connection maintenance and security features are valuable, including managing logs on WAFs, identifying break-in attempts writing rules to block them and using HAProxy to control...
Pricing of Loadbalancer.org is something to consider.
So far, I would rate it around a five out of ten.
Loadbalancer is expensive. At Globo, it is probably the most expensive tool we use. Annually, we are paying more than $1 million. I think the price is fair because we are heavy users that put on massive events that are on TV and streamed on the internet.
The solution requires an annual support license that includes software upgrades and support. Compared to other devices in our network, the solution is quite affordable.
This solutions costs $5 per user per month. Web also needed to pay for a platform license that cost 26,000 Indian rupees.
I have a rough idea of the cost. However, I don’t generally handle licensing details. I’m not sure, for example, if support is included or an extra cost. I’d rate it a four out of five in terms of affordability, with five being the most expensive.
Licensing fees are paid annually.
Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, with additional costs, however, in some cases, the price remains the same. It is dependent on the customer and what discounts F5 has given. Loadbalancer.org is based on open-source products, but it requires money for support and other activities.
Pricing is great. I couldn't really complain about it. It's all good. They're not the cheapest, not the most expensive, but I think value-wise, they're 100%.