The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies.
Trellix Endpoint Security is an affordable tool. Its renewal price is also quite low. The product is available as a subscription license or a perpetual license.
I would emphasize its affordability rather than merely focusing on cheapness. It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness.
Trellix Endpoint Security is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a four out of ten.
Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine. The licensing cost for the solution is 20k a year for 400 users and 10k for 200 users. You don't have to pay additionally for the solution's maintenance.
Trellix may cost around $46 to $47 for a single license without an EDR. In contrast, Trend Micro may cost $23 to $25 USD without an EDR sensor. Trend Micro is much cheaper. Trellix may have extra costs in terms of managed services. That might be around $200 to $250. I'd rate the solution six or seven out of ten in terms of affordability.
ITOfficer at U.S. Army Medical Research Unit - Kenya
Real User
2022-08-25T13:37:46Z
Aug 25, 2022
I think Trellix is more on the higher side of the market, just on a general scale, but I also think it depends on what particular package you choose. Different packages have different rates. I would give the pricing a three out of five. It depends on your usage because if the product works for you, then you might say the price is right. At one point it worked for us, but we have shifted our goals.
IT Lead Engineer, Information Technology at Banglalink
Real User
2022-05-12T21:46:26Z
May 12, 2022
We pay for the solution on a yearly basis. It is affordable. I don't exactly know the amount as it is maintained by someone else on my team. We have another separate team that basically manages the financial part.
McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so. Most end-users don't focus on which solution is better, but on which one is most cost-effective. Our customers must pay for the licensing involved in using the solution, which they do so annually. Yet, the majority of our customers deploy the solution on-premises, which means their licenses are perpetual. There is still a need to pay for support, however, and this must be renewed annually.
We took out a three-year license, including support, but it is slated to end come December. We would like to switch to a yearly subscription. We pay for the license on an annual basis.
A perpetual license is not an option with McAfee Endpoint Security or anyone else for that matter. The price of the solution is high in Asia, in contrast to Symantec, which gives you a 70% discount on the closing of the project. The issue at hand involves the people. McAfee did have some big clients in my country and region. However, it did not have many clients.
Network Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-04-01T15:50:23Z
Apr 1, 2021
There is a one-year and a three-year license available for this solution, we are currently on a three-year license. There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive.
IT Infrastructure Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-02-17T17:06:30Z
Feb 17, 2021
We had McAfee on a year renewal. We purchased it initially and then we renewed it on a yearly basis. I think the only reason we are renewing the license is for support reasons.
Senior Project Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-08-27T10:31:00Z
Aug 27, 2020
As always, the cost of the licenses has to be paid and it will be per user per year. But the cost is minimal because we have taken a sort of deal with McAfee for a site license.
Trellix Endpoint Security provides aggressive robust protection for every endpoint in an enterprise organization. Trellix uses dynamic threat intelligence and mounts a superb defense across the complete threat lifecycle. This solution will keep your organization more secure and resistant to any possible threat of risks. Trellix offers an amalgamated suite of next-generation endpoint security tools. These tools give users the benefit of machine learning, intuitive intelligence, and greater...
The license costs are very reasonable, around 1,000 to 1,200 rupees per year.
The solution is not an expensive tool. Compared to other options, it's mostly average-priced. I've deployed it for customers ranging from 100 nodes to over 5,000 nodes. Its renewal prices are very low, and it offers both perpetual and subscription licenses. With a perpetual license, the product will keep working as long as it's not end-of-life, which benefits companies.
Trellix Endpoint Security is an affordable tool. Its renewal price is also quite low. The product is available as a subscription license or a perpetual license.
I would emphasize its affordability rather than merely focusing on cheapness. It provides good value by striking a balance between cost-effectiveness and feature richness.
Trellix Endpoint Security is neither a cheap nor an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a four out of ten.
I would rate the cost as four to five, considering it's normal compared to other products. I find it nominal and worth the money.
We have a yearly subscription. We have bought the solution for ten stations. The pricing is more or less the same as the other tools in the market.
There are some extra expenses for using the product, in addition to licensing related to the maintenance of the product.
Compared to Bitdefender, Trellix Endpoint Security is more expensive, but considering it comes with DLP, the solution's price is fine. The licensing cost for the solution is 20k a year for 400 users and 10k for 200 users. You don't have to pay additionally for the solution's maintenance.
I rate Trellix Endpoint Security a nine out of ten for pricing.
I rate Trellix five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap, but not expensive.
Trellix may cost around $46 to $47 for a single license without an EDR. In contrast, Trend Micro may cost $23 to $25 USD without an EDR sensor. Trend Micro is much cheaper. Trellix may have extra costs in terms of managed services. That might be around $200 to $250. I'd rate the solution six or seven out of ten in terms of affordability.
I would rate it a three out of five in terms of cost.
I think Trellix is more on the higher side of the market, just on a general scale, but I also think it depends on what particular package you choose. Different packages have different rates. I would give the pricing a three out of five. It depends on your usage because if the product works for you, then you might say the price is right. At one point it worked for us, but we have shifted our goals.
We pay for the solution on a yearly basis. It is affordable. I don't exactly know the amount as it is maintained by someone else on my team. We have another separate team that basically manages the financial part.
I believe their prices are very good. Our customers pay an annual license fee.
People, naturally, go for a yearly license. I am happy with the pricing.
Its price is reasonable. Setup was easy.
McAfee's prices are flexible and can be quite competitive, although there are other solutions that are even more so. Most end-users don't focus on which solution is better, but on which one is most cost-effective. Our customers must pay for the licensing involved in using the solution, which they do so annually. Yet, the majority of our customers deploy the solution on-premises, which means their licenses are perpetual. There is still a need to pay for support, however, and this must be renewed annually.
We took out a three-year license, including support, but it is slated to end come December. We would like to switch to a yearly subscription. We pay for the license on an annual basis.
I cannot comment on the price, since we have a separate team that handles this issue.
A perpetual license is not an option with McAfee Endpoint Security or anyone else for that matter. The price of the solution is high in Asia, in contrast to Symantec, which gives you a 70% discount on the closing of the project. The issue at hand involves the people. McAfee did have some big clients in my country and region. However, it did not have many clients.
The pricing is pretty reasonable. It's not too expensive.
There is a one-year and a three-year license available for this solution, we are currently on a three-year license. There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive.
We had McAfee on a year renewal. We purchased it initially and then we renewed it on a yearly basis. I think the only reason we are renewing the license is for support reasons.
The pricing is great and licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis.
I think the costing is fine compared to other products. Cost-wise you definitely get value for your money.
Its price is very high. It is higher than its competitors, and it should be less.
The price of McAfee is pretty similar to Symantec, and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.
The price of this product is good.
It is not that expensive. There is no additional cost. We got the entire bundle together.
As always, the cost of the licenses has to be paid and it will be per user per year. But the cost is minimal because we have taken a sort of deal with McAfee for a site license.
It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market.
This product is costly.
The pricing is comparable to other solutions. We have no issues with the pricing of this solution.