Director, Identity & M365 Engineering at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Dec 23, 2025
Regarding the pricing of One Identity Active Roles, it is definitely on the expensive side compared to solutions for what it does. It is a necessary need for us. I don't know One Identity Active Roles' business model, but it is very niche in the sense that they are going to target complex environments like mine that have a need for delegated access. There are other IGA platforms that do delegated access and offer a much larger suite of solutions, but it is definitely on the expensive side. I think our total was in the seven-figure range for a couple of years of service.
Head of Global Digital Identity Services at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Apr 4, 2025
The product is expensive, but if you want to save money, the delegation set-up process is quite easy. After setting up Active Roles once, defining the delegation model, it is very efficient, almost like copy-paste.
solution architect/ engineer at APEX.IT Sp. z o.o.
Real User
Top 10
Mar 31, 2025
I would rate the setup cost ten out of ten. It is quite expensive, costing more than 50 euros per identity. While it is worth the price, not many companies are willing to pay such an amount of money.
Team Lead, Technical & Enterprise Directory Services Vita Program at AIS Network
MSP
Top 10
Jan 30, 2025
The pricing is high. I have not been involved with the renewal or cost aspect, but I know it is not cheap by any means. However, it is very useful for our environment.
Senior Systems Engineer at a government with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 10
Sep 25, 2024
I wasn't involved in purchasing the solution, but I get the impression from management that it's priced about the same as other products, and we get more value from it.
Managing Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jul 7, 2015
It’s a gentleman’s agreement. Licensing is based on Enabled User Accounts in AD. This should include user accounts, application accounts and service accounts.Temporary accounts could be excluded, but no one from vendors really challenge the user count which the customer provides. Some customer’s find the price bit on higher side but, for me, the price is competitive compared to other products with similar functionality and considering the ROI. The product functionality does not cease if the customer exceeds the license count. The vendor does not want to force the customer to stop using the product if the license count increases. Instead, customers can buy additional licenses without hampering the day to day work.
One Identity Active Roles is a highly regarded solution for Active Directory (AD) security and account management. One Identity Active Roles will enhance group, account, and directory management while eradicating the need for manual processes. The end result is a significant increase in the overall speed, efficiency, and security of the organization.
Using One Identity Active Roles, users can:
Easily increase and strengthen native attributes of Active Directory (AD) and Azure AD.
Quickly...
Regarding the pricing of One Identity Active Roles, it is definitely on the expensive side compared to solutions for what it does. It is a necessary need for us. I don't know One Identity Active Roles' business model, but it is very niche in the sense that they are going to target complex environments like mine that have a need for delegated access. There are other IGA platforms that do delegated access and offer a much larger suite of solutions, but it is definitely on the expensive side. I think our total was in the seven-figure range for a couple of years of service.
The product is expensive, but if you want to save money, the delegation set-up process is quite easy. After setting up Active Roles once, defining the delegation model, it is very efficient, almost like copy-paste.
The pricing of One Identity Active Roles is expensive, but the return on investment justifies the cost, allowing for savings in other areas.
The solution is not expensive, yet not as cheap as I would like it to be.
I would rate the setup cost ten out of ten. It is quite expensive, costing more than 50 euros per identity. While it is worth the price, not many companies are willing to pay such an amount of money.
The pricing is high. I have not been involved with the renewal or cost aspect, but I know it is not cheap by any means. However, it is very useful for our environment.
The pricing for Active Roles is expensive but not as expensive as other solutions like Okta.
I wasn't involved in purchasing the solution, but I get the impression from management that it's priced about the same as other products, and we get more value from it.
The solution is fairly priced. That said, I have nothing to compare it to.
It's fairly priced.
The pricing is on the higher end.
The price is reasonable. It costs us about 1 million Danish kroner annually, and we also spend about half as much on consultants.
Active Roles is above average on pricing compared to similar solutions. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees.
It’s a gentleman’s agreement. Licensing is based on Enabled User Accounts in AD. This should include user accounts, application accounts and service accounts.Temporary accounts could be excluded, but no one from vendors really challenge the user count which the customer provides. Some customer’s find the price bit on higher side but, for me, the price is competitive compared to other products with similar functionality and considering the ROI. The product functionality does not cease if the customer exceeds the license count. The vendor does not want to force the customer to stop using the product if the license count increases. Instead, customers can buy additional licenses without hampering the day to day work.