Regarding pricing, the K2-Series costs can vary significantly. For smaller series, like the fifty series, there's a major price difference compared to larger options. Pricing discussions also depend heavily on customer needs and can sometimes be negotiated.
The pricing is more expensive, but they have a vast range of products. I just saw some products that are more affordable for small companies. We have one customer that is a large company, but we also have many small companies. The products that I have seen are very expensive. The prices are not affordable for small companies.
One of the benefits is we can use some of the features from Palo Alto Networks K2-Series for free. If we want more features we have to pay. There is a license to use the solution and it is paid annually. The overall price of Palo Alto Networks K2-Series could be reduced.
Learn what your peers think about Palo Alto Networks K2-Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
Senior Systems Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-10-04T18:59:00Z
Oct 4, 2021
When comparing Palo Alto Networks K2-Series with other solutions it is on the higher end of the price scale. This solution is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses.
Data Center - Assistant Group Manager (Information Security) at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
2020-08-23T08:17:17Z
Aug 23, 2020
The licensing costs are too high. They need to become more competitive in that regard. We constantly need to bargain to get better pricing. They tend to take advantage once the product has been sold to us. From a renewal point of view, the price is very high. They are demanding. That itself is creating a bad mark on them. From a cost perspective, I'd rate the solution two out of ten. I am trying to avoid Palo Alto, even though they have a very good solution, specifically due to the cost.
Pricing is a sensitive issue because the cost is high in this market. If the price were reduced then it would be very good because it will be more competitive with vendors such as Fortinet. In fact, I would say that pricing is the weakest point of this solution.
Network Security & Virtualization at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-03-03T08:47:00Z
Mar 3, 2020
I am actually satisfied with the pricing of Palo Alto even though it is expensive. If you are talking about using products by a leader in the field and it is a bit expensive compared to other vendors, then that is totally fine for me because you are not compromising your security. In many other cases — like if there are budget issues — the companies can always go for Fortinet. It is also a good firewall, but it is cheaper. If you have got the budget to purchase Palo Alto, get it. If you do not have the budget, go for Fortinet or any other firewall.
Designed to handle growing throughput needs due to increasing amounts of application-, user-, and device-generated data, the K2-Series offers amazing performance and threat prevention capabilities to stop advanced cyberattacks and secure mobile network infrastructure, subscribers, and services.
Regarding pricing, the K2-Series costs can vary significantly. For smaller series, like the fifty series, there's a major price difference compared to larger options. Pricing discussions also depend heavily on customer needs and can sometimes be negotiated.
The pricing is more expensive, but they have a vast range of products. I just saw some products that are more affordable for small companies. We have one customer that is a large company, but we also have many small companies. The products that I have seen are very expensive. The prices are not affordable for small companies.
I rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten. It is expensive.
I would rate the product seven out of ten for pricing.
If you compare K2-Series' quality with its price, I think it is reasonable.
One of the benefits is we can use some of the features from Palo Alto Networks K2-Series for free. If we want more features we have to pay. There is a license to use the solution and it is paid annually. The overall price of Palo Alto Networks K2-Series could be reduced.
Palo Alto Networks K2-Series is an expensive solution, the price could be reduced. They are more expensive than some of their competitors.
This product is designed for large companies. The price would not be suitable for a small or medium-size company.
When comparing Palo Alto Networks K2-Series with other solutions it is on the higher end of the price scale. This solution is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses.
The product can be expensive. It's not the cheapest option on the market. However, I do find it to be less expensive than Cisco.
The price of the solution is expensive. They should provide more features to match the high price of the solution.
The licensing costs are too high. They need to become more competitive in that regard. We constantly need to bargain to get better pricing. They tend to take advantage once the product has been sold to us. From a renewal point of view, the price is very high. They are demanding. That itself is creating a bad mark on them. From a cost perspective, I'd rate the solution two out of ten. I am trying to avoid Palo Alto, even though they have a very good solution, specifically due to the cost.
Palo Alto firewalls are very expensive.
This is an expensive solution, although you will get value for the price.
Pricing is a sensitive issue because the cost is high in this market. If the price were reduced then it would be very good because it will be more competitive with vendors such as Fortinet. In fact, I would say that pricing is the weakest point of this solution.
This solution is expensive compared to other, similar products.
The price of this solution is too high.
I don't have an idea of what the licensing costs are.
I am actually satisfied with the pricing of Palo Alto even though it is expensive. If you are talking about using products by a leader in the field and it is a bit expensive compared to other vendors, then that is totally fine for me because you are not compromising your security. In many other cases — like if there are budget issues — the companies can always go for Fortinet. It is also a good firewall, but it is cheaper. If you have got the budget to purchase Palo Alto, get it. If you do not have the budget, go for Fortinet or any other firewall.