Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives. I would rate the pricing at five.
From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one.
Learn what your peers think about Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
Senior Network Security Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-12-08T17:33:32Z
Dec 8, 2022
The pricing depends on the hardware or license purchased but is expensive. There is an initial investment but the return is good because the solution has many features, is stable, and scales without having to change anything on an existing deployment. When considering the value obtained, I rate pricing a nine out of ten.
The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive. These devices cost a lot here in Mauritius, for example, one device can cost approximately $4,000. The cost for the license would be in addition to this.
The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive.
Compared to other security offerings, Palo Alto is very expensive. Palo Alto also doesn't offer many discounts. They may discount as much as 15%. However, in comparison, Cisco can give a discount of up to 85%.
General Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Reseller
2019-02-10T10:06:00Z
Feb 10, 2019
The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time. Especially on these smaller firewalls and so on, we need to be a bit more competitive. Palo Alto is a company that focuses more on the high endS, high-speed class type of massive organizations and firewalls and so on, which is why they are the most scalable firewall. In Africa, the organizations tend to be smaller than you would get in Europe, the USA, China and those types of places so we tend to sell more of the smaller firewalls. Palo Alto's smallest firewall at this stage is very expensive which makes it difficult, but then again it's just not the area that they're really playing in. It still outperforms any of the other firewalls.
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is a cloud-based security service that combines cutting-edge technologies, including machine learning, artificial intelligence, and expert human monitoring, to effectively thwart advanced threats like malware, zero-day attacks, and command-and-control threats. It offers inline protection, scrutinizing all network traffic irrespective of port, protocol, or encryption. An integral component of Palo Alto Networks' security platform, it enjoys...
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention is quite competitive, offering extensive threat detection and prevention capabilities, though it is priced higher than some alternatives. I would rate the pricing at five.
The solution comes with a license.
The product’s pricing is expensive for small companies.
I use the learning materials that are free of charge.
The price of the solution is higher than others on the market. A price reduction would be beneficial if it does not impact their database quality.
From one to ten, with one being the most expensive, I would rate the pricing of Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention a one out of ten. It is my understanding that Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention is the most expensive one.
The pricing depends on the hardware or license purchased but is expensive. There is an initial investment but the return is good because the solution has many features, is stable, and scales without having to change anything on an existing deployment. When considering the value obtained, I rate pricing a nine out of ten.
We pay for licensing on a yearly basis. You simply need to pay the licensing fee and there are no extra costs.
The cost involves the price of the hardware, which is expensive. However, most of the Palo Alto solutions are expensive. These devices cost a lot here in Mauritius, for example, one device can cost approximately $4,000. The cost for the license would be in addition to this.
Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention could improve by having consistent pricing at system levels.
The pricing could be lower.
The pricing has improved with the newer generation of their Firewalls, but the price could always be lower. In comparison with other solutions, I believe they're quite competitive.
If you want to have all of the good features then you have to pay extra for licensing.
It is an expensive solution and I would like to see a drop in price.
Compared to other security offerings, Palo Alto is very expensive. Palo Alto also doesn't offer many discounts. They may discount as much as 15%. However, in comparison, Cisco can give a discount of up to 85%.
The pricing is a bit higher than the competition, but it's okay. The cost seems cheaper than Cisco's Firepower.
We take licensing on a yearly basis. Palo Alto provides a straightforward cost structure on the annual plan.
It's not too expensive. It's a more powerful tool for IT companies that need a next-generation tool.
The pricing and the licensing are pretty competitive at this stage. As a reseller, I would like to see the price come down a little bit so I can compete better against other firewalls because we do that all the time. Especially on these smaller firewalls and so on, we need to be a bit more competitive. Palo Alto is a company that focuses more on the high endS, high-speed class type of massive organizations and firewalls and so on, which is why they are the most scalable firewall. In Africa, the organizations tend to be smaller than you would get in Europe, the USA, China and those types of places so we tend to sell more of the smaller firewalls. Palo Alto's smallest firewall at this stage is very expensive which makes it difficult, but then again it's just not the area that they're really playing in. It still outperforms any of the other firewalls.