Chief Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-06-04T16:58:40Z
Jun 4, 2024
I have a vague idea because I don't know what others are charging. But we felt that putting up with the pains and having to spend more time keeping it running than we expected is still better than trying to have an operations team pull messages manually. So we still feel like there's good value there. It's just taking more manpower out of our team than we would like to keep the software running.
Senior Information Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-11-08T20:01:41Z
Nov 8, 2022
The way most big companies work with Proofpoint is that they try to tie everything into an enterprise license. I can't comment on the actual costs, however I do know that alternative solutions such as Abnormal Security can be much more expensive than Proofpoint Threat Response.
Security Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2019-04-11T19:38:00Z
Apr 11, 2019
It's quite easy to implement the solution. It takes only two to three days max, and we can run it on virtualization. It requires fewer resources. The product cost is low. It's quite affordable to have it with this much functionality and it's easy to administrate. The administration and management of the solution are very simple.
Learn what your peers think about Proofpoint Threat Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
No defense can stop every attack. When something does get through, Proofpoint Threat Response takes the manual labor and guesswork out of incident response to help you resolve threats faster and more efficiently. Get an actionable view of threats, enrich alerts, and automate forensic collection and comparison. For verified threats, quarantine and contain users, hosts, and malicious email attachments - automatically or at the push of a button.
I have a vague idea because I don't know what others are charging. But we felt that putting up with the pains and having to spend more time keeping it running than we expected is still better than trying to have an operations team pull messages manually. So we still feel like there's good value there. It's just taking more manpower out of our team than we would like to keep the software running.
The way most big companies work with Proofpoint is that they try to tie everything into an enterprise license. I can't comment on the actual costs, however I do know that alternative solutions such as Abnormal Security can be much more expensive than Proofpoint Threat Response.
It's quite easy to implement the solution. It takes only two to three days max, and we can run it on virtualization. It requires fewer resources. The product cost is low. It's quite affordable to have it with this much functionality and it's easy to administrate. The administration and management of the solution are very simple.