The licensing cost could be a potential problem depending on the agreement, especially for smaller businesses. In our company, this was manageable due to existing agreements with Cisco. ThousandEyes licenses are based on the number of flows processed, not just the number of agents deployed.
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. Based on different region specifics. This platform has a very big value in the future, but different organizations have different contexts of economic value. And then there are a few challenges. From a product context, I don’t know competitive products. Personally, I have not gone into that. So, the pricing can be reasonable based on the PPFC, potential pricing. So the price is more suitable for large businesses. So if I look into 1000 to 1500people organizations, even if they are into NextOps security, of course, there is a huge cost-benefit analysis and so many things I have to validate before I promote or even suggest this tool because it will change the whole infrastructure, execution, and other elements. So I felt that. But I felt that this was slightly over there. If you look into the really big value that it pays, it can create.
In our company, we incur a yearly expense in our company for the licensing part. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten since it is expensive. Also, there are no additional costs apart from the standard license and fees for the solution.
For now, billing is on an annual basis but it may change to a monthly fee. It's what we would prefer. Whichever way that goes depends on the equipment and service.
ThousandEyes is a Network Intelligence platform that delivers visibility into every network an organization relies on, whether public or private. ThousandEyes enables users to optimize application delivery, end-user experience and ongoing infrastructure investments.
With cloud, enterprises can innovate much faster, but the growing number of cloud and SaaS applications means that more apps are being delivered over the Internet. This increases dependence on the Internet, a public “best...
The licensing cost could be a potential problem depending on the agreement, especially for smaller businesses. In our company, this was manageable due to existing agreements with Cisco. ThousandEyes licenses are based on the number of flows processed, not just the number of agents deployed.
I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive. Based on different region specifics. This platform has a very big value in the future, but different organizations have different contexts of economic value. And then there are a few challenges. From a product context, I don’t know competitive products. Personally, I have not gone into that. So, the pricing can be reasonable based on the PPFC, potential pricing. So the price is more suitable for large businesses. So if I look into 1000 to 1500people organizations, even if they are into NextOps security, of course, there is a huge cost-benefit analysis and so many things I have to validate before I promote or even suggest this tool because it will change the whole infrastructure, execution, and other elements. So I felt that. But I felt that this was slightly over there. If you look into the really big value that it pays, it can create.
The solution's pricing is cheap; I rate it a five out of ten.
The solution is cheap. We procure it by making a one-time payment.
It is a quite expensive solution. I would rate it ten out of ten.
In our company, we incur a yearly expense in our company for the licensing part. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten since it is expensive. Also, there are no additional costs apart from the standard license and fees for the solution.
The costs depend on the agency deployed and how many requests are made over the agents. The price is in the middle. It is not cheap and not expensive.
I have no visibility on the pricing. It's not an aspect of the solution I deal with.
For now, billing is on an annual basis but it may change to a monthly fee. It's what we would prefer. Whichever way that goes depends on the equipment and service.