Our primary use case for the product involves mounting it with our EC2 instances for scalable storage needs. We utilize it in an environment that requires automated scaling and cost-effective storage management.
We are in the process of reorganizing the services that currently exist within the university on our premises. Our plan is to transition everything to the cloud. We initiated this transition using Azure and started implementing AWS for the learning system. Currently, we're in the prototype stage and haven't reached the production phase yet.
Learn what your peers think about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
I'm a consultant, and I architect solutions for customers by using Amazon EFS in other Amazon products. I am using EFS based on NFS version 4. I have a customer who is using around 20 Linux servers hosting MySQL databases. Their storage is in Amazon EFS. So, around 20 Linux servers are connecting to Amazon EFS.
Customer Engagement, Presales and GIS Solution Architect at ESRI INDIA
Real User
2020-03-30T07:58:00Z
Mar 30, 2020
We need our storage to expand based on demand but storage is a bit costly. So we start with a smaller amount and, as we grow, we use EFS on demand. It manages our costs. We can predict our storage which comes over a period of time. So it is better that we start small and it automatically helps us grow.
Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.
When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file...
We have some critical applications. It's a file system. All the Linux file systems, they use it, and they use it as part of high availability.
Our primary use case for the product involves mounting it with our EC2 instances for scalable storage needs. We utilize it in an environment that requires automated scaling and cost-effective storage management.
I use the solution in my company for serverless containers. It was also useful for upscaling cloud services and managing EC2 instances.
The solution is useful for storing details of our internal projects.
We are in the process of reorganizing the services that currently exist within the university on our premises. Our plan is to transition everything to the cloud. We initiated this transition using Azure and started implementing AWS for the learning system. Currently, we're in the prototype stage and haven't reached the production phase yet.
My company's clients use Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) for NFS.
We use the solution for deploying large serverless functions. It helps run Lambda functions with large dependencies like Tensorflow.
The solution is quite stable. There were some bugs at a point but after we patched it, it was stable.
I'm a consultant, and I architect solutions for customers by using Amazon EFS in other Amazon products. I am using EFS based on NFS version 4. I have a customer who is using around 20 Linux servers hosting MySQL databases. Their storage is in Amazon EFS. So, around 20 Linux servers are connecting to Amazon EFS.
We need our storage to expand based on demand but storage is a bit costly. So we start with a smaller amount and, as we grow, we use EFS on demand. It manages our costs. We can predict our storage which comes over a period of time. So it is better that we start small and it automatically helps us grow.