What is your primary use case for Check Point NGFW?

I do not use them, I just sell them, but customers are using them to protect on the edge and at the core.

I use Check Point NGFW in my role as an Information Technology Security Engineer. We have implemented it for our customers and use it ourselves.

We are using the solution for the perimeter. It's used as a core firewall, with almost all transactions passing through the firewall. For instance, in a cellular phone company, all transactional authorizations pass through the firewall, while in a bank, authorizations for branches and ATMs go through the firewall. The main customers are in the BFSI, telcos, industry manufacturing, and other large enterprise sectors.

We needed stateful inspection, logging, integration with Active Directory, and the ability to monitor devices using standard SNMP for use cases. Now, with the tool's Skyline product and OpenTelemetry, we can monitor it through Prometheus and Grafana. It has all the features we needed when we certified the solution.

The primary use case of this solution is to protect the organization's LAN network from cyber threats.

I use the solution in my company for cybersecurity, securing perimeter networks, giving the user access to VPN, URL filtering, antivirus, sandblast, network segmentation, and monitoring purposes.

We primarily use the product to block traffic at the application layer, limiting access to YouTube and social media during busy periods while allowing it during lunchtime or office hours.

The primary use case of many organizations is to protect their environments from outside cyber threats across multiple layers of infrastructure. For example: 1. At a perimeter level, it protects the network at the parameter; many organizations use this firewall. 2. It provides scalability and seamless traffic flow in a network. 3. It has all-in-one next-generation features, so many organizations save money using this firewall.

The tool helps with VPN and connecting mobile devices. We also use it for identity security. It filters internet access and controls applications. The firewall has an intrusion prevention system and stops data loss.

It's just enterprise firewalls, firewall clusters for redundancy to secure the company network from the internet, and as well as a data center firewall, for example, if you want to split up subnets to control traffic between them.

My company is an IT service provider. We suggest customers choose the Check Point next-generation firewall along with other OEMs for their environment. Once they choose (and confirm the product with model capabilities), we migrate the existing firewall to the new firewall. I have deployed multiple Check Point products. Based on my experience and its effective features, I do suggest customers go with Check Point NGFW. I love its security profiles which effectively secure the organization's LAN, DC, and DMZ network.

We use the solution for threat prevention, antivirus, VPN, endpoint, and email security. Harmony Email Security and Harmony Endpoint are now under Check Point.

Check Point is mainly used for internal communication. Our clients have multiple platforms, and customers use it for internal communications and protection, from the DMZ to the LAN to the DMZ, and also for MPLS connectivity with multiple branches. As I've seen, the customers also use it as a gateway for publishing their website. This is only for the perimeter, however.

We use the solution for threat protection in the banking and finance sectors.

Generally speaking, it's like any other NGFW. It's quite a versatile solution for many aspects. It's not like a separate solution for firewalling, but a separate solution for web access. It's just very convenient to have everything in one box. On the other hand, when you need something, like a very top-rank solution for very specific things, like network intrusion prevention or network intrusion detection as a component of NGFW, I would say it looks weaker compared to the well-designed solution for its purpose. It has the same issue as many other versatile or unified solutions, so it's really convenient.

The primary use case for the Quantum Spark Security Appliance 1570 in our organization is unified threat management, firewall protection, intrusion prevention, anti-virus, and anti-malware defenses to secure our network against external threats. We use its remote access solution, to secure remote access through VPN capabilities and mobile device support, ensuring our employees can connect safely from anywhere. Additionally, the appliance features content filtering, application control, and bandwidth management to optimize network performance and enforce usage policies.

Currently, we utilize Check Point firewalls, IPS, site-to-site VPN, and remote access VPN features for our various client operations. We have implemented a cloud firewall for one of our customers and primarily handle perimeter security using Check Point firewalls for multiple customers. We also handle POCs, implementation, upgrades, and daily security operations as part of our services. We are distributor partners who also distribute Check Point products to our customers. We recently convinced our clients to use Check Point firewall services and signed a contract with them.

Primarily, it's used for customers who want to add their network security.

The product is an excellent perimeter firewall solution. But compared to Palo Alto, the management console is critical. It's difficult to let customers understand the dashboard of the firewall because there are three distinct dashboards. The three dashboards include smart connect, Check Point Firewall dashboard and more. The solution is used by our organization for security purposes across small and medium banks in our country, who happen to be customers of our company.

In our logistics setup, we employ Check Point NGFW across various critical areas. For instance, we use it to secure different database applications within our systems, ensuring robust protection for our operations. Whether it is managing updates, maintaining standby reliability, or enhancing system performance, Check Point NGFW plays a vital role in safeguarding our logistics infrastructure.

Our customers find that the Check Point NGFW highly effective for data center deployments. Additionally, smaller models are well-suited for branch locations where local internet breakout is necessary. These smaller models streamline internet access at remote sites, eliminating the need for third-party service providers and reducing costs. The 26000 and 28000 series excel in securing DMZs, while the lower-end versions are ideal for branch-level internet breakout, allowing direct cloud connectivity without intermediary networks. It offers cost savings and efficient security solutions tailored to various deployment scenarios.

The primary use case is for safeguarding against various threats. Our organization utilizes NGFW for secure on-premises computing, particularly for users in sectors like government, banks, and government departments who prefer to maintain their private computing environments.

We use the tool as a data center firewall. Some of our customers use it as a perimeter firewall. We are only using the security gateway.

For Check Point, the main cases are just perimeter security, network security, basically detecting threats on the network, antivirus, application control, visibility, login, and data threat prevention.

We use the product as a firewall solution for application control, defined rules and policies, and insights features.

Historically, the primary uses for these gateways were perimeter security and internet filtering. However, we now push all our internal traffic through the gateways for LAN segregation and to isolate obsolete operating systems. Our isolated operating systems and LANs only allow specific traffic from a specific source to access them, making these critical production/business systems more secure. It's not a simple case of just replacing these legacy operating systems but replacing the industrial machinery that they control - which would require an investment of tens of millions of pounds.

We use it for safeguarding our office network on a routine basis. These firewalls protect against external threats, manage VPN access for remote users, and address various security scenarios. Our primary focus involves malware prevention, intrusion detection, and ensuring robust security measures to shield our office network from potential cyber threats originating from the internet. It serves as a traditional yet effective security system, providing comprehensive protection against hackers and potential risks associated with internet usage.

The solution is our main firewall. It protects our perimeter.

We use Check Point Quantum Network Gateways for all our on-site firewalls. It protects the network edge, network core, data center, and our AWS direct connect. We are a payment facilitator and security is one of our core requirements. We have implemented VSX which enabled us to reduce the hardware footprint. We have implemented 6700NGFW, 6600NGFW, and 6400NGFW in different network segments. We have enabled basic firewall, ClusterXL, and IPS licensing. Due to the nature of the traffic, we do not use Application Control or URL Filtering.

The primary use case for this solution is to protect the devices under the firewall. There is a customer who has many switches and routers in their network. They are only protected by an old Cisco ASA firewall. So, the customer instead finds a new vendor or service, and thus we install the Check Point Firewall. Since the customer has many devices, it takes quite some time to move the Cisco ASA firewall rules to the Check Point policies. However, Check Point has a function to import the policies so it takes less time to do so. Still, the rules that were imported are a mess so we still need to check them one by one and fix the errors before installing them in the customer environment.

We use the solution as a perimeter firewall. We also use it for endpoint security and VPN.

The primary use case is segmentation in many different areas of the company network. We had a few critical use cases: there was a need for an internal firewall, and also an edge firewall. Apart from having simple segmentation, we had a requirement for additional features like the possibility to decrypt traffic, the possibility to inspect URLs or the intrusion prevention system feature. A very important thing for us was also to have a very good quality of vendor support. Definitely, this is something we can get here.

We use it as NGWF for the DMZ area on our data center. We deployed HA configuration of Check Point Quantum 6200 to protect our user connection to the internet and to protect the server farm in our data center. In our first year, we got free access to the full capability of SandBlast, the Check Point solution for sandboxing features. We tested, yet felt the sandbox is not quite needed in our environment and thus changed the subscription for the second year and forward to the standard feature. Check Point can also be integrated with third-party solutions like SIEM and so on.

I usually apply Check Point to protect my customer's environment as a main solution boundary gateway, DMZ gateway, LAN gateway, or VPN site-to-site with other Check Point appliances and other vendors. I do a Harmony Endpoint full integration. I use other tools such as threat prevention blades (like IPS and IDS), anti-virus, anti-bot, anti-malware, and the Sandblast solution.

We have multiple customers that use this product. Integrated logging is the best around. It's clear and does the job it's supposed to do. We typically install this as the network edges and encourage our customers to have one at each location. Some prefer to backhall the smaller sites to the main branch where it handles all the inspection and rules. We also set up multifactor SSL VPN solutions at the main location which allows visibility into remote worker traffic. Overall, it's used mostly by small to medium businesses.

The solution is used for edge and interior firewalls. We use large-scale Check Points for our edge and have them set up in an active/passive cluster. For our internal firewalls at the remote sites, we use a virtual firewall for the OT DMZ, and then behind this virtual firewall, we have a physical appliance for the actual OT network. This allows us to fully secure the critical network yet still allow access via jump hosts or other remote management that we have approved. It also gives us excellent control over any north/south traffic.

We're an international research laboratory, focused on thermonuclear energy experiments. Due to strong remote collaboration, and to control network communication, we choose the Check Point NG Firewall solution. Most of the personnel are researchers. We also have a strong collaboration with a University and take care of a European Ph.D. on thermonuclear fusion, as the future clean energy.

Our customer’s infrastructure is entirely based on Check Point. They are using around 2,000 firewalls worldwide. We resolve the problems in their product as a service provider.

It offers a range of models to enhance network security and it can be customized to secure endpoint client machines or user devices by deploying features like malware detection, antivirus, and mail security blades. Its integration with a web application firewall provides added protection.

We use Check Point Next-Generation Firewall as a perimeter firewall. This means that all incoming and outgoing traffic from our premises is routed through the Check Point firewall. Within our configuration, we have activated several security features and licenses, including the firewall itself, site-to-site VPN functionality, application and URL filtering, Identity Awareness, threat simulation, and anti-bot protection. Additionally, we possess the license for the NGpX version, which includes extraction capabilities.

We use the solution to configure sandboxing features for enterprises. We also use it for policy-level configurations and VPNs.

We use it for our core firewall and also for VPN.

We use the solution for full-scale integration and end-to-end management at the organization. The Check Point NGFW implementation took place quite smoothly. Check Point NGFW is the best in terms of comprehensive protection against network threats and security against malware and phishing attacks. It smoothly restricts these via anti-phishing algorithms. Check Point NGFW source package covers all the bases - application control, NAT, DLP, routing, content awareness, VPN, desktop security, and much more. It is scalable, provides end-to-end resolution and customized productive services like providing a complete solution for perimeter protection that blocks the traffic based on an IP address or on applications and content. This makes Check Point NGFW highly promising and makes it a complete solution.

We require local perimeter security in one of our workshops, which is why we require a new-generation firewall solution. The local equipment works for us to be able to provide perimeter security in our workshop. Thanks to these Check Point Gateway devices and with the integration of many additional security solutions, we have protection against zero-day threats. In addition, we have the possibility of carrying out all the management from the Infinity security portal and can administer all our policies, view logs, and monitor devices, among other tasks.

Check Point NGFW proved to be highly scalable, secure, and stable, among other alternatives of multiple firewalls present in the market. At an organizational level, the integration and implementation of Check Point NGFW took place on a priority basis due to data and system security concerns against malware and phishing attacks. Check Point NGFW bifurcates, channels, and segregates the internal network and builds a secure VLAN, and separates it for every department. Check Point NGFW is highly scalable and provides end-to-end resolution and customized productive service making Check Point NGFW more promising and user-friendly than its alternatives and services like navigation, control, and filtering ensure that all users stay connected to business applications and restrict traffic.

Check Point Next Generation Firewall is one of the most secure and stable firewalls present in the market. the integration & implementation of Check Point Next Generation firewall took place due to security concerns, and we were impressed by what this product brings with it. The integration of Check Point Next Generation Firewall in my organization has taken over one year or so, and it helps to segregate the internal network and build a secure VLAN that separates every department. Scalability, end-to-end resolution, and customized productive services make Check Point Next Generation Firewall far better than the alternatives present in the market. It has services like navigation, control, and filtering that ensure that all users stay connected to business applications and helps restrict traffic.

We are currently migrating specific servers to the Azure cloud, so we are half in the cloud and half on-premise. For this reason, we needed to use a tool that would help us with this objective of being able to have both environments insured from vulnerabilities or dangers that occur in the network. Check Point NGFW came to implicate security tasks since it provided us with the ideal solutions to be able to keep all the organization's personnel safe from any malware penetration. The solution also brings certain innovative features that other brands do not offer.

We have deployed this software to provide comprehensive security beyond the Next Generation Firewall (NGFW). This software provides advanced analytics on any security measures that can have a great impact on our applications. It blocks malware attacks that can destroy data and leak confidential information to unauthorized parties. Check Point NGFW has helped the company to set up security policies that enhance the effective transfer of files and secure browsing strategies. There is improved prevention of external threats to data and increased production across the networking infrastructure.

We needed a perimeter solution that would add value to our organization by safeguarding our information, equipment, users, and all the infrastructure we have within our entire organization. We needed something that, in the future, had the capacity to be scalable as well as something that was easy to configure. We wanted to ensure that it could be configured in a way that, if high availability is required, it would be fine. In that search, we decided to try the NGFW from Check Point.

I've been dealing with the Check Point environment for over eight years, ever since SPLAT, the R75 versions, and mainly with a multi-domain management (former Provider1) set-up. I also use the Smart Management Server, with a standalone/distributed deployment. I'm currently engaged in the design, implementation, and maintenance of a large-scale Check Point firewall environment (~100 GWs). Presently, the customer is using Check Point for perimeter security, IPS, threat prevention, encrypted traffic, as well as access to the internet, and multi-domain server architecture.

We are using these Next Generations Firewalls to segregate and protect our data center and business-critical data from the user LAN. We have some of the resources behind these firewalls which should be allowed to a certain set of users only. This is done using the authentication against the Active Directory groups and only the designated users are allowed to access the contents based on the firewall rules. Along with this, we use IPS and Antivirus features to protect our most critical network.

At the organizational level, we needed to protect the security of our organization. This is where a much broader need arises. We must protect each of the branches that our company has - in some cases larger than other branches. We took on the task of implementing a next-generation firewall from Check Point which allows us to have valuable equipment that adjusts to the needs of each of the branches according to their size and organizational demand by the number of users. This equipment is designed for infinity architecture.

We have different cloud platforms within the organization and needed a solution that would allow us to control different aspects of them from one single platform, which has allowed us to manage and apply policies across all different locations. It has allowed us to be more efficient with compliance and maintenance of all different platforms; management of the users is now tighter, and fewer resources have to be invested in applying all the needed policies and levels of access based on company roles.

The product is basically for completing a firewall task. On top of that, the aim is to find a comprehensive solution with the innovations from next-gen. We made an isolated zone in a small part of the company. Here, we aimed to provide basic security features with few security devices. In this context, we ran the Check Point appliance by opening almost all the blades on it. The Check Point software architecture was able to provide quite good results because it ran on its own OS. It's pretty good as a VM. At a point where we wanted to isolate VM devices, we provided a solution with a VM series of Check Point.

I have been using this solution as a perimeter firewall. Our organization has ISP-based DDoS protection on the outer attack surface. Then, we have Check Point Next Generation Firewall with an IPS module as a second layer of protection. And then, we have Check Point Access Control, Application, and URL filtering, anti-virus, and anti-bot modules enabled. We also have the cloud-based Check Point Threat Emulation solution and different segmentations on Check Point Firewall as a DMZ zone, internal zone, and external zone. Our internal zones have different segments to improve our security level. We apply it by dividing our network into different VLANs by using the Check Point solution.

The solution is primarily used as an edge firewall safeguarding any organization or company which are really considering it as their number firewall of choice. In addition, there were also companies that are only using the specific blades, for example, IPS or IPsec, only as their primary solution. It is mostly used as an edge firewall. Sometimes, all security blades are utilized. As a significant part of the whole network infrastructure, Check Point delivers high detection and prevention rates when talking about suspicious and cyberattack types of activities.

We use the solution for the DMZ firewall. It's very common and very easy to make configuration, Having IPsec for tunneling solutions with third-party routers and firewalls with other branch offices is very helpful. It offers support for segmentation networks. The geolocation feature makes it so that our company can easily allow or block a location of IP and can integrate with our SOC or our log management system. URL filtering is very powerful for blocking malicious connections. The user interface is very cool and easy to use. It has anti-DDOS protection which is very useful too.

I have used this product in chemicals, insurance, and industrial sector companies. The primary use case is to secure the inbound and outbound traffic and secure the DMZ servers. We use this solution for Remote access VPN (on smart view event can see reports more granular level) and IPSEC VPN for using the applications hosted on Public cloud and integrate the customer 3rd parties vendors. Using threat prevention helps in securing the customer environment from cyber attacks, ransomware, malwares etc. We use the Sandboxing features to protect the network from zero-day attacks

We initially started using the Check Point device for the VPN blade. After using the VPN blade for several months and using the hardware interface we found it very easy to use. The small business hardware device was powerful and easy to set up. We started using the firewall and Nat shortly after that. Having additional features like the threat prevention that has IPS antivirus antibot and threat emulation we're all added bonuses. This also gives us a piece of mind for the safety of our business.

We use Check Point NGFW as a perimeter firewall.

The main use of the Check Point NGFW in our organization is the protection of all of our on-site infrastructure. This includes all network elements, physical and virtual servers, end-user equipment, and all other elements that may be linked in the future within our infrastructure. The product is provisioned in a virtualized environment with the purpose of expanding resources whenever required and generating high availability of the services it offers us, both in the protection of applications through application control and the other blades that make up this solution.

Checkpoint Firewall provides advanced security for the organization and its connection to the members/participants. The Check Point FW controls access and traffic to and from the internal and external networks. The Check Point Firewall rule base defines the access control and network performance to help our organization achieve the below security goals: * Only allows authorized connections and prevents vulnerabilities in a network * Gives authorized users access to the correct internal networks * Optimizes network performance and efficiently inspects connections

We use Check Point for the firewall in DMZ and surrounding zones and another product we have. We use a variety of series from 2000, 4000, and 6000 gateways, and also we use Smart-1 and Maestro solutions. We apply some features (IPS - Intrusion Prevention System, application control, reporting, antivirus, and anti-spam) using Smart-1 to make day-to-day operation more simple and easy using one management for all gateways. The remote console, such as SSH, is a little complicated, however, you can use it for troubleshooting.

We primarily use it for internet security. We use it for firewalling, ePass, and threat detection including anti-malware protection, bug protection, and social inspection. We can also use it for DLP.

It's a unified policy table that combines threat prevention and segmentation policies. Smart Event allows consolidated event management and exporting features is very useful when we need to deal in reports, since, for some time now, everyone has been working from home and on the firewall from Check Point. This function is implemented very conveniently and securely. The VPN over this firewall works as well as a standard VPN device. All in all, I'm delighted with their security solution. It is making configuring numerous layers of security policies easy to use and it always has been one of the things I liked most about their firewall solution.

I'm at a university in Queretaro, Mexico and it's used to protect our infrastructure: wireless, LAN, PCs. Since the solution prevents attacks, we have the checkpoint in all our equipment, from the critical infrastructure to the directors' and employees' cell phones.

We are using this product as a firewall which does have the capacity to block the IPS signature as well. It is highly accurate for the IPS engine and has the best-in-class log monitoring and report generating facility in the firewall. It is easy to manage, as it has a centralized management console. We are using the firewall as a VPN service as well. It is very easy to troubleshoot the issue with the VPN. We are using IPSEC features where we can enable tunnels with the client and we can safely communicate with vendors due to encryption.

We deploy solutions for customers. We don't engage in buying. We are both consultants and implementers.

I protect customers and other types of data by ensuring a secure environment. Check Point allows me to deploy quickly and securely, along with using more advanced detection and prevention. By securing multiple sites and various infrastructure elements, I have reduced my overall workload. I'm using a lot of permanent tunnels and protecting them to ensure that monitoring customer infrastructure is not compromised in any way, shape, or form. Various hardware has been deployed at proper sizing for customers and the equipment is stable without the need for a lot of custom configuration

The Check Point firewall is a reliable perimeter security product. Check Point gives me access to explore various security features in a single box (loaded with all features that an organization needs most). I can say I have been using it for one year and getting a grip on it and I will always try to implement it wherever it is required. When it comes to Check Point, there are great security features and a marvelous inbuilt design that caters to handling all threats, including zero-day attacks and perimeter security. I really like the user-friendly interface of the Smart Console dashboard and the maximum security is integrated.

Our business houses just over 100 staff, along with over 200 devices ranging from mobile to tablets, computers, laptops, and Servers. We use a Check Point 5100 cluster running R80.40 to protect our business from external threats. Our network is also extended to the likes of Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, and other 3rd parties utilizing secure VPN tunnels terminating on our Check Point 5100 cluster. Our business also offers the ability of hybrid working - which is only possible with our Check Point solution.

Check Point firewall is used as edge protection. Traffic to the internet and from the internet does go through the firewall where IPS, URL, and app policies are applied. Check Point was also used as an internal firewall to segment traffic between the data center and the user network. Basically, all traffic from any user will have to be inspected by an internal Check Point firewall before any server is accessed. Check Point is also used for PCI-DSS credit card checks within any email sent or received. This is effective in detecting credit card numbers within any email sent by a user in error and blocks that from being exposed.

I work for a systems integrator and have designed and deployed solutions over many years with Check Point components. Problems solved with Check Point NGFWs have included securing the edge, data center segregation, SWG replacement, Remote Access, and many others. I have designed and installed Check Point deployments from a single SMB appliance to multiple highly available chassis, running numerous virtual systems. Numerous different use cases include appliance form-factors, running modules, and licenses.

This is the perimeter firewall and manages all security facing towards the internet, It's a distributed solution composed of a Security Gateway and a Security Manager. It controls all the traffic from the LAN to the Internet and the VPN tunnels for connections with external partners. We control the traffic to the internet with blades as URL filtering to manage the bandwidth, limit the use of this resource, and apply the security policies as well as protect the LAN network against advanced threats from the internet to the servers and PCs.

We use the product to secure our network, using all Check Point has to offer, including multi-domain servers, centralized log servers, gateways on-premise, and VSX. It has improved a lot with the last versions making day-to-day operations very user-friendly. I have used almost all the blades Check Point has and it's incredible what a Next-Generation firewall is capable of, including VPN, IPS, monitoring, mobile access, compliance, and more. The reports of the Smart Event console are also very useful. It's good to have a view of what's going on in our network. Since Check Point has Linux working on them, it gives us plenty of tools to adapt to any specific need we have.

We use the solution as a frontend firewall in our headquarters and in our branches. We use packet inspection, the antispam feature, and the VPN. We have configured threat prevention and content awareness to improve security on incoming email and on web surfing from interlan networks wits SSL inspection. Mobile access through the VPN mobile client is also used from all outside workers and is fully integrated with our AD. We also use the solution to route traffic on internal networks and manage security through client and server networks.

What can you do about threats that get past simple packet inspection by a regular firewall? You could have a layer 3 firewall inspect the protocol and block known threats from certain URLs, however, what if it comes from a URL that has not been reported and is a socially engineered exploit designed to hijack your data? This is where a Layer 7 firewall will be able to inspect the application, known as payload inspection. While this is possible to do with a Layer 3 firewall, it can be difficult due to the number of protocol messages in Layer 7. You would need to create a signature for each application you wanted to protect; however, network signatures tend to block legitimate data and increase your MTTR (mean time to resolve an issue). Plus, having these signatures makes it hard to manage and keep up with by the IT staff. Relying on the power of AI and the cloud in order to leverage the Layer 7 firewall is key. The advantage of Layer 7 is its protocol awareness, which allows it to differentiate between different network traffic (application knowledge) and not just packets or flows that identify ports and IPs (Layer 3).

Working in an MSP environment, there are more than a hundred firewalls and we use Check Point NGFW firewall which is mainly implemented as perimeter security and internal segmentation firewall. Due to our requirements, we implement site-to-site VPN between clients and cloud providers (AWS/Goggle/Azure). The centralized managed infrastructure makes it simple for the IT staff to operate and monitor the firewalls. The Smart Console provides a single pane of glass that allows the IT staff to easily manage the environment and troubleshoot issues.

My primary use case of this solution is for the data center in the perimeter security. We configure all of our security features like anti-boot, antivirus, and filtering.

I use the NGFW as a Firewalling device, for VPN tunneling, and for virtual patching. My environment is a two-tier network environment. I also use the Check Point NGFW as an IPS.

We first deployed Check Point for our clients. Our first client wanted to deploy the security appliances in a cluster solution for their network infrastructure solution. The NGTW chosen was the 5800 series and it was deployed as a software solution on clients' servers. Everything is going smoothly and the client seems happy with our proposal.

Check Point is currently our perimeter firewall at various locations. We use their failover clustering with high availability option, which performs flawlessly. Upgrades are easy to perform and have always worked reliably for us. Technical support is always available to assist with these operations, which makes the process less stressful to the admins. We are also using their ISP Redundancy feature, which works as advertised - perfectly! It's easy to implement, especially with the awesome documentation from our engineer. We also use their Remote Access VPN offering and have really seen its value this past year, due to COVID-19. The VPN has been 100% rock solid, especially during the most critical times in our history.

We are a Critical Access hospital with close to 1,000 endpoints and hundreds of users. We currently have multiple ISPs coming into the hospital for internet redundancy. There are multiple buildings on our campus that are connected with copper and fiber. We have had clinics in multiple cities attached to our network at various times. We installed the Check Point NGFW in our environment to act as our main firewall and gateway. This allows us to keep several of the vendor devices (lab analyzers and other third-party equipment) segregated on different VLANs so they have no access to our production VLAN. This system is also our VPN concentrator for several site to site VPNs and remote software VPN connections.

We needed to replace our external firewall solution as we were having issues with the HTTPS inspection on our previous solution and the level of support being provided was terrible, leaving us with an issue that could not be fixed for over six months. We had already deployed a new internal firewall solution but needed something that would protect that from external factors. We also needed a new solution to replace our client VPN solution. The Check Point solution gave us that as one whole solution instead of having to manage multiple services.

We use our Check Point NGFW firewall mainly for perimeter security. Those firewalls are placed at many sites distributed over Europe. We love the firewall management and think it's still the golden standard for creating a rule base and we go more and more in the direction of identity bases user access to secure our environment. The other firewall blades, such as Anti-Bot, Application and URL-Filtering, and IPS, are used on all sites. It's easy to deploy, as the firewall is able, with the latest version, to learn from the traffic and adapt the IPS policy.

We use Check Point firewalls to prevent attacks against the data center servers by adding more layers of security, such as IPS, Data Leak Prevention. We have also used Check Point to implement security policies in layer 7 and applications as well as to configure the VPN for internal users of the organization.

I am using Check Point Next Generation.

We use the solution for a perimeter firewall, an internal segmentation firewall, and a routing device in our organization.

I have been designing, deploying, implementing, and operating Check Point's Security solutions including NGFWs and EndPoint security as well as Remote Access VPNs, Intrusion Prevention systems, URL filtering, user identity, UTMs, et cetera, for around 12 years. I have also used VSX and MDS/MDLS solutions. In my organisation I am using over 150 virtual and physical appliances and also MDS for virtualized/contanerized central configuration management and also central log management MDLS/MLM. We are using this not just for NGFW but also for other Perimeter security solutions.

It's our main firewall and the first line of protection from the outside! We use it to interconnect our remote locations (that use different vendors and equipment) and let the employees work remotely. We're a small site with 300 users and this equipment is more than enough for us. We use almost all the blades and the equipment has run smoothly for years. This NGFW monitors all the traffic outside of the main network, prevents malicious activities, and lets us easily manage network policies to shape our connections.

The primary use of the solution is as an enterprise perimeter firewall in our data centers. We also use software blades for IPS/IDS functions as well. We have a combination of enterprise-grade firewalls like the 15000 and16000 series as well as mid-size versions like the 5000 and 6000 series which are for specific segment isolation or other purposes. The software blades are running on HP servers. Management is done via 5150 appliances. 5000 and 6000 series appliances are primarily used for segment isolation while the larger appliances are used for perimeter security.

We use this solution for permissions regarding access ports and services. We also use Check Point Remote Access VPN as an endpoint VPN. We use it for site-to-site configuration. All of the traffic that comes through our sites passes through our firewall. Basically, everyone, including our staff and clients, passes through our firewall. In other words, we have thousands of users using this solution.

We use this solution for perimeter security and data center security.

We use Check Point NGFW for perimeter protection of our network from the internet. We also use it for threat protection at the network level and the endpoint level. We provide implementation, installation, and support services. We know about all types of firewalls, and we work with all types of installations. We usually use appliances, but in test environments, we use virtual appliances.

I use Check Point NGFW for controlling traffic and controlling access to the production server. It is a HA (high availability) environment. It is easy to use failover solutions. We use it on our disaster recovery (DR Site) and it runs smoothly.

We primarily use this product for cloud computing security. It is an integration platform for IPS and I also use it for performance monitoring. I also coach classes on the use of this firewall, which is installed on my personal laptop.

We use this solution for the VPN, from site-to-site and remote. We also use it for advanced IPS, IDS, malware protection, and the sandbox. The sandboxing functionality is one of the best features.

We use this product for providing perimeter security, as well as advanced threat protection capabilities to critical infrastructure. The solution is expected to deliver high-performance throughput for voluminous traffic continuously. We are using these gateways for multiple functionalities such as: * Perimeter Gateways * Anti - APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) * Anti Malware / Anti Virus * SSL Inspection * Network Intrusion Prevention System * Private Threat Cloud All of our solutions are expected to run in high availability and have good resiliency.

We use this solution for complete protection against advanced zero-day threats with Threat Emulation and Threat Extraction. We also use: * NSS Recommended IPS to proactively prevent intrusions * Antivirus to identify and block malware * Anti-bot to detect and prevent bot damage * Anti-Spam to protect an organization's messaging infrastructure * Application Control to prevent high-risk application use * URL Filtering to prevent access to websites hosting malware * Identity Awareness to define policies for user and groups * Unified Policy that covers all web, applications, users, and machines * Logging and Status for proactive data analysis

Our primary use case is as a perimeter firewall for main and DR sites for a financial institution. It secures Internet access for users through IPS/AV/Threat Emulation/Application control and URL filtering with HTTPS inspection and geolocation restrictions. It secures our email and MDM solutions. We also use it to create site-to-site VPNs with vendors. Remote access is achieved through the use of a secure workspace and SSL network extender. Securing and inspecting HTTP traffic to our web servers is another important task. It secures several DMZs and segregates them from the rest of the network. We use all of the security features available.

I'm a consultant at a Check Point partner. I have deployed a lot of Check Point firewalls and support Check Point firewalls for our customers. Our customer environments are different. I have deployed standalone, cluster, and two-layered firewalls.

We have a pretty small office and therefore, a small network environment, and the SMB appliances from Check Point were a perfect fit and exactly what we were looking for in order to improve our overall security posture in the office. It was critical for us to be able to secure our network, including intrusion detection and prevention along with threat emulation and extraction for zero-day threat help, and Check Point fit perfectly. After implementing the solution, we were able to get through a third-party penetration test of our network without issue.

Our branch offices and customer sites require Internet access for the on-site staff and remote access capabilities for after-hours and remote support. The Check Point firewalls allow us to provide site-to-site VPN, client VPN, web/app filtering, and IPS functionalities. Client VPN is leveraged by site staff due to the majority of our sites requiring 24-hour support and also allows centralized teams to remotely assist with multiple sites globally. We also use these at locations to provide security when our stand-alone network requires connectivity to the customer's network.

The role NGFW plays is to protect the organization against Layer 7 network attacks. The solution has helped us to guard our perimeter security on a wider level. This is not like plain vanilla firewall. We have got a wider visibility with the help of this next-generation firewall; it shows us the traffic flowing across the network and based upon that, we have made the modifications required to restrict access. Also, the active cluster module has helped us to balance the load during peak hours. Since moving to the active-active module, we have got the much-needed breathing space.

The primary use is to protect the organization from any kind of attack. It is able to isolate, secure, and control every device on the network at all times. Solutions should have the ability to block infected devices from accessing corporate data and assets. It provides access to the Internet for corporate resources in a secure manner. Our resources are used to host applications and services that are accessible to end-users over the Internet. It is used to provide required/limited access for third parties who want to connect to our corporate network. Access is granted based on application type and should be independent of port or protocol. It provides next-generation protection including IPS/Web Filtering/SSL decryption and more. It offers centralized policy management capabilities for all firewalls.

Our primary use case is to secure the perimeter and users in our network. We use IPS/IDS, deep packet inspection, and VPN.

In my company, we use the Check Point NG Firewall solution to secure the perimeter and user network. We use IPS/IDS, deep packet inspection, and VPN. We have implemented routing rules based on the destination of the traffic, and the performance of the global solution is satisfactory. We use the solution, too, as the firewall in a core node, which is very important to the business. It secures the network equipment and service integrity. We are delighted with the powerful management console and diagnostic tools.

Nowadays, there are many threats and it's necessary to have an automatic process to defend your organization. The Check Point NGFW is a good solution for this use case.

We support various clients in the government sector in Mexico. We provide different solutions in terms of network security, data security, and perimeter security. The NGFM Firewall is available locally and different offices and/or institutions of the government sector pass through a more secure and controlled infrastructure. This type of infrastructure has different zones or areas that are managed and keeping them centralized has helped us to maintain and control them. In addition, we are generating fast and safe solutions for our users on each site.

We have deployed Check Point firewalls for perimeter security and also for filtering East-West traffic. Check Point helps in improving perimeter security along with giving insights into different kinds of traffic and attacks. Isolation between different tiers of APPs is critical for us and Check Point is utilized for handling high traffic volumes of East-West traffic. We are leveraging the VPN module on the perimeter firewall for users to access the VPNs. VPN authentication is integrated with RSA for multi-factor authentication.

We were looking for an easy, centrally-managed firewall infrastructure as we were using a standalone solution that was difficult to operate and maintain because it was composed of several different systems. We needed a solution that had support for virtual systems, and we needed such flexibility without increasing the cost by too much. On the other hand, comparing within the sector, Check Point NGFW has a good stack of security mechanisms (modules, aka blades in CKP terminology) that are easy to implement and use.

We deployed a Check Point firewall on the perimeter as well as on the internal network. Both are in HA & we have enabled all threat prevention blades. All devices are 5600 & 4200. We are managing our two firewalls with two different security management servers. Currently, we are using the R80.20 firmware version and we have a pretty simple design. Our primary uses are firewall security, VPN, web filtering & monitoring. We have also used the TE-100X appliance for private cloud sandboxing.

The purpose of using the firewall is to protect the users from the external network, internet. Apart from that, we have set up IPsec tunnels between two different sites, and for internal usage, between two different zones, we use these firewalls as well. Our environment consists of a 3-tier architecture, which is recommended by Check Point. We use the central management system to manage our 3-tier architecture, and we use the Smart Console as well.

We use this firewall to protect the internal network and to set up the IPSec standard from one location to another.

We use this solution as a layer 3/4 firewall deploying access rules in our DMZ. We have more than six different centers with different service layers, a core of up to 500Gb per site, and other service centers providing security for all inbound and outbound connections. VSX gives us the capacity to consolidate hardware in fewer devices, reducing the OPEX, and creating different VFWs to provide service to different environments or services. Layer 7 features allow us to upgrade our security services. Activating the required features only requires upgrading the license.

In today's world, we can't completely rely on traditional signature-based devices, as technology involving cyberattacks is becoming more sophisticated. We require an all-in-one solution that can defend against newly-created attacks, necessitating the usage of NGFW firewalls. This is where Check Point comes into the picture. Our environment contains multiple roaming users, where we have to extend trust beyond the organizational network. Not only is there east-west traffic to deal with, but a large volume of north-south traffic, as well. We are required to monitor all of the traffic, which includes many branch offices connected centrally. Monitoring Data via DLP in such a scenario, we require a single solution, which is nothing but Checkpoint.

I work as an internal network team member. We protect the company environment from outside threats, outside viruses, and ransomware attacks. It is kind of an IT administrator job. They are protecting internal security as well as giving us security from the outside world or public environment.

We use firewalls to protect our private environment from the public environment. My IT group is in charge of protecting the environment and maintaining safe usage of the internet. This product gives us a better, safer solution for the users within our company.

The main use case is Firewall provisioning and integration with Tufin and Skybox. Also, we focus on firewall compliance, rule review, VPN configuration, and network troubleshooting.

We use Check Point firewalls to secure our internal network from the outside world and to provide a good, comfortable, and secure environment for our employees. We have various models from the R80 series, such as the R80.10 and the R80.30.

We have two clusters. We are using them as both perimeter firewalls and data center firewalls.

We use the solution to protect our organization and workers from the outside Internet or any untrusted network. We have the three-tier architecture of Check Point. We use its consoles, central management system, and firewall device for managing it. This three-tier architecture is recommended by the Check Point Community.

We are using this solution for the security enhancement of our internal company network. This is to protect our customers as well as internal users from the untrusted network or outside world. I am using the physical appliances of Check Point Firewall as well as virtual machines (VMs). We are using the same versions of R80 on our VMs that we are using for our physical appliances.

Our primary use cases for Check Point NGFW are for perimeter security and content filtering for browsing behavior.

We're using Check Point Next Generation Firewalls to secure the internal LAN network from unwanted threats and for protecting the environment for business use.

The Next Generation Firewalls, the 64000 and 44000 series, provide us with support for large data centers and telco environments. They're quite reliable and provide great performance.

In my previous company, one of the clients was a big chocolate company. They had this payment card infrastructure (PCI), where they needed to have auditors from PCI check the firewalls to see if everything was okay. So, they had web-based authentication. I'm working with the 5800, 5600, and 5200 models. I work with the UTMs as well. These are physical appliances as well as open servers.

We use it to protect our network from the outside world and unsecured networks. We also use it to provide a safe, secure network to the internal users of our organization. I am using various versions on the model, like R80.10 and R80.30.

Check Point protects our environment from external threats. In particular, we use: * Application Control for Internet access * HTTPS Inspection for outgoing connections into the internet * Separate the OT network from the normal data LANs * SSL VPN for End Users - Check Point Mobile VPN Client is used on the end-user clients * Site-to-Site VPN for connecting other companies to our environment We are using two Check Point boxes in a ClusterXL Setup so that one appliance can die and the environment is not affected. We also use a cloud gateway for internet security on users, which are only connected to the internet (outside the office).

I support multiple clients within the UK, the EMEA region, the US, and now in Asia Pacific as well. I specialize in Check Point firewalls. I design and secure their data centers, their on-premises solutions, or their businesses security. The firewalls are mostly on-premise because most of our clients are financial organizations and they have strict compliance requirements. They feel more secure and have more control when things are on-premise in the data center. However, there are use cases where I have helped them to deploy Check Point solutions in the cloud: AWS, Azure, and in Google as well. But cloud deployments are very much in the early stages for these clients, on a development or testing basis. Most of the production workloads are still on-premise in data centers. Most of my customers are still using R77.30, and they are on track to upgrade from that to R80, which is the current proposed version by Check Point.

It's an on-prem deployment where we use it to protect our client and end-users who are working with the internet, and to protect their servers from external access. They have about 100 users and two servers.

We use it as a normal firewall for perimeter security, using some of the Next Generation features, like Anti-Bot and Antivirus. We have two ISPs. We have a different firewall system in front of the Check Point Firewall. We also have normal Cisco switches combined with the Check Point solution. Then, our internal network is with Cisco, which is about 300 servers and 1,500 clients.

We recommend to clients who are installing applications that they can work with Check Point Next Generation Firewalls. Our role is to support our customers in terms of their migration, firewall room cleanups, and implementing all the security features that the firewall has. Our clients have branch offices in Mexico and Bermuda. Check Point is one of the top names in these areas.

The primary use is to segregate the environment internally to create a lab environment and a production environment, for example. We also use them to protect the company from the internet and when going to the internet; to protect the perimeter of the company. We use them to create a VPN with customers and clients, and with the other companies that belong to the group. We work with 1200s, 1500s, 4000s, and 5000s.

We use them to protect our edge infrastructure and for interconnecting our sites using the VPN.

We provide solutions for various customers where we apply Check Point Firewalls, either for a VPN gateway or for securing their networks. We have provided them to a couple of financial customers to protect their mobile banking as well.

The primary use of the firewall is to allow or block some traffic. Mainly, it is the perimeter firewall for the Internet. It filters the traffic from external to internal, e.g., to secure the traffic. Some of our customers have been demanding Check Point as their firewall product. I do the installation, support, firewalls, etc.

We use it for VSX virtualization and we use it for normal firewall functions as well as NAT. And we use it for VPN. We don't use a mobile client, we just use the VPN for mobile users.

I had 3200 appliances deployed in my company where we had two CMSs. We had multiple VSXs on those appliances due to the main firewall that we had on the VLAN. We also had an external firewall on the VLAN, which were used to monitor and allow the traffic within the network. That is how we were using it. They have a new R81 in place. Currently, they also have R75 deployed in the environment, but they are planning to upgrade to R80.20 because that particular firewall has very high CPU utilization and there is no more support for R75.

For the SMB appliances, the use case is tricky because I don't actually like them too much. If you have a very small branch office, you could use one of them, but in that case I would just go for the lowest version of the full GAiA models. But for small locations that are not that important, it is possible to use one of the SMB appliances, the 1400 or 1500 series. The full GAiA models, starting with the 3200 and up to the chassis, are the ones we work with the most, and you can use them in almost every environment that you want to secure, from Layer 4 to Layer 7. The only reason to go higher is if they don't perform well enough, and then you go to the chassis which are for really big data centers that need to be secure. About a year or a year-and-a-half ago, they introduced the Maestro solution, which gives you the flexibility of using the normal gateways in a way that you can extend them really easily, without switching to the chassis. You can just plug more and more gateways into the Maestro solution.

We work with these firewalls for overall security, including content filtering.

We are mainly using it for policy installation and access purposes. We have a bank project where we are using mobile access, Antivirus, and IPS. These are all are configured on the Check Point Firewall, where we are using it on a daily basis. I have worked on the following firewall series and models: * 15000 * 23900 * 41000 * 44000. I have worked on the following versions: * R77.30 * R80.10 * R80.20. I am currently working on the R80.20 version and the hardware version is from the 23000 series.

We use several of the blades. We use it for regular access control, but we also use the application control. We use HTTPS inspection and threat prevention. We use the Mobile Access blades as well IPS. We have a Smart-1 205 as our management server and for the gateway we've got 3200s.

We use Check Point's firewall to provide network security to our organization as well as to other, third-party vendors.

We use it to provide security to our environment from the outside world. We are using it to provide security against vulnerabilities using threat prevention, Antivirus, and IPS.

We use it to provide security in our organization. Check Point Next Generation Firewalls are designed to support large networks, like a telco environment.

My role is to do implementation and troubleshooting on the Check Point Firewall. We use this firewall for our organization's security by adding restrictions and security from viruses and other tech from the external Internet. It is used in our internal company-wide network. It protects our company throughout the LAN network.

The reason we have the Check Point Next Generation Firewall is that it's our main perimeter firewall in all our branches around the world. It secures the IT infrastructure in all of our environments and our subsidiaries. We also use it to set up tunnels between all our sites. We have multiple versions from the legacy R77 to the latest R80.40.

I am using this solution for perimeter security in the company. Our firewall security is centralized under one management. Also, we use this firewall to manage some of the VPN clients and the employees' access across the company. Each firewall is capable of using the VPN client, but we only use two. We have five in total, but we only use two for these issues. I am using the firmware version for the operating system. The blades are firewalled for IPS and mobile access.

We use Check Point NGFW as a perimeter NAT Gateway with the security features, it helps us to prevent hackers. We implement Check Point-based infrastructures for our customers. In most cases, this is the same perimeter gateway and internal segmentation firewalls. Many of our customers also using the VPN feature to organize remote access to the company's assets for employees, especially in the COVID period, and to connect their branch offices to the base infrastructure. Environments are differing from one out customer to another, but these are primary use cases.

I have been using this solution since the GAIA OS R77 was there. I am using it for my day to day access such as policy creation, policy modification, and also regularly policy disabling and deletion. I have 17K+ users in my organization, 100 + client to site VPN and I have a number of S2S as well. My daily job is health checkup, security log monitoring and incident management, daily IPS checks, threat presentation reports and to analyze the risk and take necessary action on that as well.

Check Point NGFW is being used as a security product in the environment. It is securing the IT infrastructure and delivering the services as expected. In the current world scenario, IT is becoming the backbone for every organization, and most business is highly dependant on IT so securing the IT infrastructure is becoming challenging. Check Point NGFW meets the expectations of our organization to secure the IT infrastructure as per organizational need. Check Point NGFW also gives many security features in single box which reduce your management complexities.

*Perimeter Firewalls - to protect regional hubs and local offices from public space and provide L3-L7 filtering *Internal Segmentation Firewalls - to secure company's internal network from movement of malicious actors and reduce traffic flows only to authorised ones *Public and Private Cloud - to secure hybrid environment either onprem or in the cloud while achieving micro segmentation per host *Cloud Compliance - to get a visibility into cloud environment and and related vulnerabilities *Data Center *SaaS

The firewall is the primary use case of this solution & IPS is secondary use case of the solutions. We are looking forward to Sandblast solutions. We also use it for cloud expansions The Check Point NGFWs brought up the security level with the help of the advanced software blades - we use Application Control, URL Filtering, IPS, Anti-Bot, and Antivirus. The setup was simple, and the performance is great - we have significant resources to expand the environment in the future without disabling any blades and thus maintaining the security on the same, high level.

Check Point leading industry provides a complete solution that is required to perimeter security along with deep packet inspection for network traffic. Check Point not only acts as a traditional firewall but it provides you with complete security for users who work from home. Work from home users observed that Check Point gives 100 % functionality without any trouble. It offers centralized management to customers where they have an IT member so there Check Point management can work properly. It is available in a smaller range to higher. Customers can get it at an affordable price.

The Check Point Next-Generation is a firewall that provides security to our inside network from the outside with next-gen features like Blocking Antibot, Antivirus, IPS, etc. Other than that, Check Point supports threat prevention for zero-day attacks. With the addition to that Check Point firewall, it also provides a VPN. We can configure Star and Mesh IPSec VPN as well as SSL VPN. Logging and reporting is one more important aspect when we talk about firewalls and Check Point did a great job in that.

Our company works in developing and delivering online gambling platforms. The Check Point NGFWs are the core security solution we use to protect our DataCenter environment located in Asia (Taiwan). The environment has about ~50 physical servers as virtualization hosts, and we have two HA Clusters consist of 2x5400 hardware appliances, managed by an OpenServer Security Management Server on a Virtual Machine (KVM), all running on R80.10 with the latest JumboHotfix. The Clusters serve as firewalls for both inter-VLAN and external traffic.

We use it for standard firewalls.

It is a typical firewall that has been implemented in most of our regions. We use it for normal firewall policies and VPNs. We are mainly using Check Point firewalls. We also have a few Check Point cloud security programs.

We have around 500 firewalls all around the world with a global team to manage them. We are using Check Point NGFW for Internet traffic, IPS, and UTM devices. Atos provides this solution, including network design and advice.

Our primary uses for the Check Point NGFW are network segmentation, identity awareness, and application control.

We primarily use this solution for routing and the protection of our internal corporate network.

We are a system integrator and the Check Point Next-Generation Firewall is one of the solutions that we implement for our clients. It is primarily used for data protection, VPNs, and sandboxing. We also use it in our own data center.

I am a Check Point distributor and the Next-Generation Firewall is one of the products that I am dealing with. My customers use this as part of their security solution that covers mobile devices, computers, their network, cloud, SD-WAN, IoT devices, IP phones, IP cameras, and others.

We have a big environment with nearly fifteen multi-vendor clusters. We are using firewalls mainly for layer three access rules. But nowadays, application-layer-based security and threat prevention are also important. We are using IPS and antivirus blades actively, too. In the Intrusion Prevention System blade, we are using a lot of different signatures and actions according to the impact, severity, and cost of the specified signature. The antivirus blade is also in the same logic as the Intrusion Prevention System.

We use Checkpoint Firewalls to protect Datacenter VLANs against each other. In addition, we use them to protect our perimeter systems from the internet, and our internal network from the perimeter. We have virtualized the systems on a VSX-Cluster using VSLS, but the basics are still the same compared to a traditional cluster. VSX gives us a bit more flexibility in the case of load-sharing. Therefore, it’s quite easy to react in the case of heavily used hardware distributing the load by failover or prioritizing VSs onto different nodes.

This is a complex high availability solution growing by over 100% per year. The complexity of the business environment made the ability to increase capacity without having to remove previous hardware much easier. We have a large online presence with users needing realtor access to our environment.

The Check Point NGFW is the best product that I have ever used. It has pluses and minuses, as do others, but the usability, simplicity, and the configuration abilities are very user-friendly. After a while, other vendors just don’t come close to it. The second thing is that is just works and it does it with ease. The upgrades and bug fixes are frequent and well documented. Also, the patches just work ;-) There are some negatives but as I already said, they aren’t many and from my point of view, we can see past them.

We use this solution for our perimeter firewall to protect our web applications, systems, and network. We are running our complete business with Check Point. The complete traffic is managed by Check Point. The Check Point threat emulation blade is enabled to protect zero-day attacks and it will detect and prevent attachments and other payloads from this type of attack.

The management of our company requires a firewall implementation. We use Check Point to complete the network compliance rules.

We primarily use the solution as a firewall device and for our VPN.

* Perimeter and datacentre firewalls * URL filtering * Anti-bot * Anti-malware * Application awareness.

Our primary use case of this solution is to use it as a security gateway.

Check Point is a very good solution. My primary use case is as a perimeter firewall. I never use Check Point's IPS. I always work with another IPS, in a different appliance. I always use the firewall modem as a firewall.

We use this product as firewall protection.

It is our next-generation firewall and IPS.

It's simply a firewall.

We are a large University with more than 1000 employees across seven faculties and growing. Student population is more than 15,000 in-house and 30,000 external. The University of Kelaniya Sri Lanka primarily uses the Check Point 4800 device to protect users and servers. The product also enables the VPN with advanced security policies inside our network. This gives us a better security posture. Valuable features include a good VPN, IPsec, and SSL. We use Check Point 4800 as a perimeter firewall and our internet bandwidth expanded to 1Gbps.