Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba
Real User
Top 5
2024-01-12T11:55:21Z
Jan 12, 2024
I use ReadyAPI for all things API testing – functional, migration, and security testing. It helps me automate tests, ensure reliability, and spot performance issues. The tool offers versatility, especially in virtualizing APIs and integrating with CI/CD.
We use ReadyAPI for API test automation. These APIs are developed by our development team and we need to validate the response. We use it for manual testing and then automation for those particular manual test cases. This has been my first experience completing API test automation or using tools for this purpose. We get the data from an Excel sheet and then we input it into the API request to validate the response which we get. That is all done automatically using the automation suit I created on ReadyAPI. We save the data from the response into an Excel sheet. In my team, there are five people who are using it and we have five different licenses.
We use ReadyAPI to build our own testing cases. We are able to use the same testing cases to complete automation tests, performance test team and security tests at the same time.
ReadyAPI can be used on the cloud and on-premise, and we are using both methods. We are using the solution locally as a server for test automation. It is local but we are also using Service Pro which is for virtualization and is on the cloud. The integration of the script happens on the dedicated test automation server on the cloud. We use the solution for coverage of database response validation and service support validation.
We have a product, a financial application, that uses a lot of services to connect to our backend systems, so we use ReadyAPI to test those services. Primarily, we use it to build out or mimic the exact services that the development team uses. Second, we use it to build out scripts in Groovy to automate certain scenarios and verify without any manual intervention.
Senior Automation Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2022-09-14T18:23:10Z
Sep 14, 2022
We mainly use this solution for testing APIs, and we also use it for load testing. SmartBear has a free version as well, which is called SoapAPI, but it does not include all of the features we wanted, so we got the paid version. The pro version has many benefits, including the load testing and more features for the API testing as well. Since we are mainly focused on backend testing, we thought it would be useful for us to have this license.
We mainly used the different applications of API. It's data-driven, so I had to create the Excel sheet and then loop it through the test suites. We were running each version, which was helpful. Our organization doesn't have many servers due to security compliance.
IT Manager at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-11-18T04:31:53Z
Nov 18, 2020
ReadyAPI is predominantly used for functional testing of the APIs. Our company has a lot of micro strategy concepts, and we are building a lot of APIs. The focus is on more validations around the APIs for faster or quicker testing rather than the frontend.
Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-10-29T21:29:38Z
Oct 29, 2020
We have a lot of external vendors that we integrate with, so we need to validate all of the APIs. Also, we need to mark those services that don't need external vendor integration.
Program Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
MSP
2020-03-30T07:58:00Z
Mar 30, 2020
Our primary use case of this solution is to test services to have an understanding of what the request to the service should be and the response. We also use it for performance tests.
We were using ReadyAPI for performance testing and creating mocks but there were some issues in terms of scaling, so we are no longer using this solution.
Testing Tool Expert at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2019-09-27T04:38:00Z
Sep 27, 2019
The primary use of this solution is to perform code testing. We can set up the environment, the representations, and the code coverage. We have this solution deployed on a Windows station, on-premises.
Test Manager at a logistics company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2019-08-26T06:42:00Z
Aug 26, 2019
I am a test manager, and we have testers who are experts with these tools. We primarily use this solution for API testing and integration. We have an on-premises deployment.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
Continuous integration
Comprehensive dashboard
API discovery
Central, standardized reporting function
Plugin architecture
ReadyAPI Projects
Multiple options for scripting to create functional, load, or security tests
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the...
We use the solution for performance testing tools.
I use ReadyAPI for all things API testing – functional, migration, and security testing. It helps me automate tests, ensure reliability, and spot performance issues. The tool offers versatility, especially in virtualizing APIs and integrating with CI/CD.
I'm using ReadyAPI for services, automation, security testing, and manual updates.
Our primary use case of ReadyAPI is as a testing tool for mock data testing. I'm a technical consultant and we are customers of this solution.
We use ReadyAPI for API test automation. These APIs are developed by our development team and we need to validate the response. We use it for manual testing and then automation for those particular manual test cases. This has been my first experience completing API test automation or using tools for this purpose. We get the data from an Excel sheet and then we input it into the API request to validate the response which we get. That is all done automatically using the automation suit I created on ReadyAPI. We save the data from the response into an Excel sheet. In my team, there are five people who are using it and we have five different licenses.
We use ReadyAPI to build our own testing cases. We are able to use the same testing cases to complete automation tests, performance test team and security tests at the same time.
ReadyAPI can be used on the cloud and on-premise, and we are using both methods. We are using the solution locally as a server for test automation. It is local but we are also using Service Pro which is for virtualization and is on the cloud. The integration of the script happens on the dedicated test automation server on the cloud. We use the solution for coverage of database response validation and service support validation.
We have a product, a financial application, that uses a lot of services to connect to our backend systems, so we use ReadyAPI to test those services. Primarily, we use it to build out or mimic the exact services that the development team uses. Second, we use it to build out scripts in Groovy to automate certain scenarios and verify without any manual intervention.
We mainly use this solution for testing APIs, and we also use it for load testing. SmartBear has a free version as well, which is called SoapAPI, but it does not include all of the features we wanted, so we got the paid version. The pro version has many benefits, including the load testing and more features for the API testing as well. Since we are mainly focused on backend testing, we thought it would be useful for us to have this license.
My use cases are mainly for the functional tests of APIs. I have the desktop installation, and I'm using the latest version.
I primarily use ReadyAPI to convert APIs into functional test cases and to manage customer information.
We mainly used the different applications of API. It's data-driven, so I had to create the Excel sheet and then loop it through the test suites. We were running each version, which was helpful. Our organization doesn't have many servers due to security compliance.
We use ReadyAPI for testing APIs.
We are using this solution for API testing on HL7 messages for healthcare.
ReadyAPI is predominantly used for functional testing of the APIs. Our company has a lot of micro strategy concepts, and we are building a lot of APIs. The focus is on more validations around the APIs for faster or quicker testing rather than the frontend.
We have a lot of external vendors that we integrate with, so we need to validate all of the APIs. Also, we need to mark those services that don't need external vendor integration.
We are partners with SmartBear and I'm a test architect.
Our primary use case of this solution is to test services to have an understanding of what the request to the service should be and the response. We also use it for performance tests.
We were using ReadyAPI for performance testing and creating mocks but there were some issues in terms of scaling, so we are no longer using this solution.
The primary use of this solution is to perform code testing. We can set up the environment, the representations, and the code coverage. We have this solution deployed on a Windows station, on-premises.
I am a test manager, and we have testers who are experts with these tools. We primarily use this solution for API testing and integration. We have an on-premises deployment.