What is your primary use case for vCenter Orchestrator?

Our solution is built in VMware. All VMs are in the Orchestrator because we have multiple sites, and we connect with vCenter to Orchestrator.

I use the solution in my company for data center visualization.

We extensively use vCenter Orchestrator for automating tasks across environments, particularly in managing server deployments and network configurations.

I use the solution in my company as it is very useful in virtualizing every physical environment that our company has. In our company, we enhanced the resources, and with less costs, we could have a single point of governance. The tool was really helpful for our company's environment.

I use the solution in my company for the virtualization of all the virtual machines in our environment.

The solution is being used for its logs.

We operate two critical data centers, Data Center A and Data Center H, in an active-active setup. These centers serve 300 remote sites, with all our applications and local servers sending data to both. We prioritize data security using protections like IPS, IDS, and XDR. Data distribution is handled by load balancers through DNSX in our virtual cloud, connecting to application servers. We also have Backup Data Centers ready to take over if A and H encounter issues, ensuring uninterrupted data services.

Since we have a data center, we use vCenter Orchestrator for process automation.

I use the solution for automation purposes.

We use the solution to run a development environment. We use Kubernetes as well in our environment.

I primarily use vCenter Orchestrator to automate workflows.

vCenter gives overall control of virtual methods.

We use vCenter Orchestrator for all our automation. We use vCenter Orchestrator workflows to automate our infrastructure entirely.

We are using the solution for multiple companies.

We use it to manage the overall VMware environment.

In our first program, we used the VCF to provide searches for our clients, then we opened our service to the public, so we changed from VCF to a VC and VCB program. We have an infrastructure software data center that we need to manage and handle all our clients' requests. We use PCD and vCenter. On top of that, we provide the PCD as a service for our clients. We give them a portal to access the resources they request. The services include site recovery, policy updates, etc.

I'm a reseller of this solution. I use vCenter if I need to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers. I'm able to manage the VMware environment where all of the VMware machines and multiple ESX are hosted. There are multiple versions of this solution available. We have more than 100,000 people in my organization. We have over 500 customers. If I look at the landscape, I have more than 300 customers, whose landscape in terms of number of servers is more than 10,000. For the virtualization, at least 60 or 70% is running on VMware.

My primary use of vCenter is to orchestrate virtual machines in the customer environment.

We primarily use the solution for service enablement applications. Those are the applications running there.

The version we use is not updated. The solution allows us to manage multiple VMware in a single, vCenter, console. It is very useful.

We are a healthcare establishment. The main essence here is the 24X7X365 availability. This was possible due to virtualization. The best-suited candidate for the virtualization was VMware as the technical resources are easily available in the market. The Virtualization standards offered by VMware are defacto industry norms. This enabled us to have better resiliency and dynamic fail-over cluster for our application server and the databases. Using the virtualizes such as VMware, we achieved HPE SimpliVity Snapshot performance due to the capabilities of vCenter deployment.

We recently deployed a SAN in our office and the servers deploy on vCenter Orchestrator. We also have a wireless deployment for different controllers, and we have many ERD solutions in our office that are hosted on VMware technology. Many of our older, physical servers are being converted into VMs, and then we use vCenter Orchestrator with them as well.

I am using this solution as a test for a future project.

I have used this solution through all of the generations from 4.1, 5, 5.1, 5.5, 6, 6.5, and 6.7. Our primary use case was for the deployment of a virtual machine with a specific naming convention. I have my own naming convention for applications such as Active Directory. The deployment model depends on the environment. For VMware, I have only used it in private cloud deployments. In Asia, it is a public cloud using Microsoft Azure.

I primarily use the solution to run my monitoring tools. For the universities I work with, the primary use is to run everything and anything.

For the deployment, we start with the VR Automation, it's part of it.

We primarily use this solution for automation. We have an on-premises deployment, and we do not plan on using the cloud.

We use the on-premise deployment model. vCenter is our primary resource for all our U.S. Enterprises. It's the central place for the VMs we are using as our servers.

We primarily use the solution to try to make use of it on a couple of workflows, as well as deployment, and packages.

The solution is a cluster of servers which is managed by the vCenter cluster manager or vCenter Orchestrator. It controls workflows for us.

We are a software IT provider. I work with vCenter. We use it for our clients. It's for customers and our customers who use VMware products. We are the implementation engineers. Most of our clients work with the traditional data counter. Our primary use case of this solution is for virtualization management, so virtualizing the infrastructure, and optimizing IT workload.

We use this solution for creating workflows, and we have a public-cloud deployment. We are a cloud service provider. We have the ability to do custom workflows for our customers, but none of our customers are using workflows right now.

We use it for segmentation and the isolation of tenants.

Primary use would be consolidation into a smaller footprint and its performance is pretty good.