We need the server configuration capacity to be enlarged with the solution's help, as it does not currently include capabilities for storage expansion during recovery.
I can't tell what needs to be improved in the tool because the product is considered to be an all-in-one solution. The tool has security, and one can enable endpoint security. The tool also has backup and DR. From an improvement perspective, the tool should allow users to add more data centers in the cloud. At the moment, there is data in Singapore, and then my company doesn't have one near us, like here in the Philippines.
The solution covers specific versions of Windows and Linux, and it would be good if other Linux versions or some special appliances could work in the Acronis Disaster Recovery environment.
IT officer at USAID Economic Recovery & Development Activity (ERDA)
Real User
Top 10
2024-01-04T11:59:48Z
Jan 4, 2024
They could provide pricing models considering the requirements of various countries and organizations. In the corporate sector, pricing was a significant concern, whereas in the development sector, price may not be as decisive in product selection.
The customization part on the infrastructure side requires a certain amount of time for URL-based forwarding because the server is assigned to a DNS. Whenever the DR happens, the new IP comes into the picture so they need to get a load balancer before the DR infrastructure, so all the traffic goes to the local data center. When there is no DR, and if there's a disaster in the local data center then that route gets chopped off and then the new routes open, which is forwarded to the DR location. Hence, the solution can be improved by including a load balancer. It becomes very easy to give only one IP to the interface and the users regardless of what you have in the packet and which IP is running the system.
Director, Information Technology at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
2021-01-25T23:49:10Z
Jan 25, 2021
The documentation can be improved, this would have helped. There are certain things that we misconfigured. If we had a clearer understanding of how the backup worked, it would have been a better backup policy.
In the future, I would like to see cross-platform support. You should be able to better manage the cost involved in transferring data when there are cross-platform activities.
Acronis needs to implement some kind of Real Time Backup or continuous backup feature. If Acronis can launch a Real Time Backup/Byte level replication with Instant Recovery (High Availability), it can compete with any High End DR solution available in the market.
Acronis Disaster Recovery Service is a hybrid cloud, all-in-one, IT continuity solution that protects and restores your data and servers in the event of a natural or man-made disaster. Leveraging the power of the Acronis AnyData Engine, Acronis Disaster Recovery Service can reliably recover your servers or entire data centers without the need for you to invest in duplicate systems or additional staff.
Acronis Disaster Recovery Service can reliably recover your servers or entire data...
We need the server configuration capacity to be enlarged with the solution's help, as it does not currently include capabilities for storage expansion during recovery.
I can't tell what needs to be improved in the tool because the product is considered to be an all-in-one solution. The tool has security, and one can enable endpoint security. The tool also has backup and DR. From an improvement perspective, the tool should allow users to add more data centers in the cloud. At the moment, there is data in Singapore, and then my company doesn't have one near us, like here in the Philippines.
Acronis Disaster Recovery is an expensive solution compared to other products.
The solution covers specific versions of Windows and Linux, and it would be good if other Linux versions or some special appliances could work in the Acronis Disaster Recovery environment.
They could provide pricing models considering the requirements of various countries and organizations. In the corporate sector, pricing was a significant concern, whereas in the development sector, price may not be as decisive in product selection.
Acronis Disaster Recovery should provide software information wherein I can change my setup to collect more information.
The product should improve compute points.
The customization part on the infrastructure side requires a certain amount of time for URL-based forwarding because the server is assigned to a DNS. Whenever the DR happens, the new IP comes into the picture so they need to get a load balancer before the DR infrastructure, so all the traffic goes to the local data center. When there is no DR, and if there's a disaster in the local data center then that route gets chopped off and then the new routes open, which is forwarded to the DR location. Hence, the solution can be improved by including a load balancer. It becomes very easy to give only one IP to the interface and the users regardless of what you have in the packet and which IP is running the system.
The documentation can be improved, this would have helped. There are certain things that we misconfigured. If we had a clearer understanding of how the backup worked, it would have been a better backup policy.
In the future, I would like to see cross-platform support. You should be able to better manage the cost involved in transferring data when there are cross-platform activities.
Acronis needs to implement some kind of Real Time Backup or continuous backup feature. If Acronis can launch a Real Time Backup/Byte level replication with Instant Recovery (High Availability), it can compete with any High End DR solution available in the market.