Senior security engeneer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-07-09T14:51:32Z
Jul 9, 2024
The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities. Future releases would benefit from additional features, such as advanced reporting tools and improved support for multi-cloud environments.
They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner. The goal would be to transform it into a live documentation resource that we frequently rely on when encountering errors. Currently, when we run into issues, our first instinct is to perform a Google search to find relevant information. It might be more efficient if we could align our documentation with specific sections or categories, such as error types or network-related topics which would ultimately lead to better issue detection and resolution.
I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty.
Principal Security Architect at Harman International Industries, Incorporated
Real User
2020-05-14T10:16:00Z
May 14, 2020
The logging needs improvement. The Firewall Manager logs are fine but when it comes to the actual logs for the firewall, that's where there is a problem. Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward.
Presales at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-03-29T08:26:17Z
Mar 29, 2020
In AWS, there are so many features that many users get confused about what to use and what not to use. For example, AWS Firewall Manager has perhaps 100 features but only a maximum of 15 to 20 would be generally used. I would say that 80% of the features confuse the users, which makes the system more complicated than it needs to be. The price of this solution could be reduced. The system should be more customizable.
AWS Firewall Manager is a security management service which allows you to centrally configure and manage firewall rules across your accounts and applications in AWS Organization. As new applications are created, Firewall Manager makes it easy to bring new applications and resources into compliance by enforcing a common set of security rules. Now you have a single service to build firewall rules, create security policies, and enforce them in a consistent, hierarchical manner across your...
AWS Firewall Manager should be open to manage other third-party appliances as well.
The product could benefit from improvements in the user interface and integration capabilities. Future releases would benefit from additional features, such as advanced reporting tools and improved support for multi-cloud environments.
AWS Firewall Manager could provide more automation. It needs to be more employee-friendly, and the security management could be more efficient.
They could consider organizing and enhancing documentation in a more structured and chronological manner. The goal would be to transform it into a live documentation resource that we frequently rely on when encountering errors. Currently, when we run into issues, our first instinct is to perform a Google search to find relevant information. It might be more efficient if we could align our documentation with specific sections or categories, such as error types or network-related topics which would ultimately lead to better issue detection and resolution.
I would like to see AWS add some UTM features to the firewall. It would also be great if AWS Firewall had native IPS/IDS. They have the separate IPS/IDS, GuardDuty.
My experience has been with small-scale infrastructure and it works very well.
The logging needs improvement. The Firewall Manager logs are fine but when it comes to the actual logs for the firewall, that's where there is a problem. Enabling and configuring the logging is not that straightforward.
In AWS, there are so many features that many users get confused about what to use and what not to use. For example, AWS Firewall Manager has perhaps 100 features but only a maximum of 15 to 20 would be generally used. I would say that 80% of the features confuse the users, which makes the system more complicated than it needs to be. The price of this solution could be reduced. The system should be more customizable.