What needs improvement with Freshdesk?

Freshdesk's major drawback is its limitation in integrating tools for App Store and Play Store reviews, and social channels like Twitter, which come with additional costs. Despite having third-party integration options, these features should be inherently available in the tool without additional expenses. Integration with social media and review platforms should be built-in.

The solution's inbound calls could be improved.

I would like to see improvements in the account management aspect, having a customer portal for better visibility into my subscription, invoices, and trouble tickets. Additionally, more flexibility in adding functions based on subscription levels would be beneficial for customization.

It would be helpful to pull reports or schedule them based on agents, users, ticket numbers, or responses.

I would say that Freshdesk is a little blunt. I would like to see a little bit more color in the solution. Other than that, I had no other issues with it. Our company didn't need anything highly technical, and Freshdesk was a helpful tool that did whatever we needed at the time. Even though we are located in the Philippines, we were able to assist our clients in Singapore and Indonesia through Freshdesk.

Sometimes our requirements are not matched with Freshdesk's free version as most of the advanced features are not available to us. So we have to adapt and manage our day-to-day work with it.

Currently, they have Freshchat as the central platform. But for email, I would still like to have assistance around how our agents can assist our customers, such as on-the-go translation; as we are expanding to the emerging market, we would not be able to hire and pay customer support agents in those areas immediately, so we won't be able to attend to their conversation if we do not speak the same language. That is something similar platforms have, which I would like to have included in Freshdesk.

We are using Freshservice as it is bigger and more extensive. We'd like Freshdesk to be more extensive as well. It should enhance its service and its reporting capabilities.

Asset management and branding are two areas in the solution that have scope for improvement. Branding is one major area that needs to improve because previously, when we recommended Freshdesk to one of our customers, he stated that he hadn't heard of the solution before telling us that he would like to opt for ManageEngine. So, he told us that Freshdesk was not a well-known brand. Even though we told him that it's equally functional, somehow, he wasn't inclined towards it. The solution's asset management needs to improve since it does not have an automated asset discovery feature, making it not a very sound tool. Also, Freshdesk depends on a third party for integration. In short, the integrations within the solution should be made available to its users as a default feature.

If Freshdesk had forms in it so that I could go to the portal and fill out a service request, that would improve it immensely and make it more valuable for enterprise customers, but that's not a current functionality. You can't have a certain catalog of any type. You can't be like, "Hey, I want to just go submit a ticket," and then type in. You can't prompt them to ask anything. It is just a blank form. Their sales team all the time tries to convince you that this is the only product that they have. I don't know why. I really don't get it. I spent a year just being like, "No, we shouldn't be in Freshdesk for this." They were telling my bosses that we should be, and I was like, "I'm telling you that's incorrect. Why are you telling my boss that? You don't even work here?" You don't even go here. What are you doing? They don't even check your circumstances. I am a certified Six Sigma Black Belt. I gave them all of our process maps and everything, and they didn't even read over them. They just kept trying to put us into Freshdesk when Freshservice was a better fit because all we do is move around trucks, trailers, and drive. That's what we do all day long. I would like to know how we would do that without asset management or a portal with forums. They were just constantly trying to get us to implement break fix after break fix after break fix instead of putting us on the right product in the first place. It wasted a year's time and money. We are using it because the bot can't live in Freshservice. The bot has to live in Freshdesk. I wish the bot could live in Freshservice or be its own thing. If it was its own thing, it would be much easier, but you have to go into Freshdesk and go into the bot builder. It is weird.

Freshdesk could improve its capabilities. It's missing the article formatting, and the overall look and feel make it not easy to use. The administration instructions on how to manage the automation, capability, and integration with third parties, such as chat or bots, are very important in these types of solutions. In a future release, it would be beneficial if Freshdesk added the ability to publish files. For example, if I have an FTP site and I need to publish something for customers, such as installation files, I cannot do it in Freshdesk. I have to upload that on another system and bring it in as a link instead of being able to do everything in one place.

Having so many tags makes everyday work a lot more complicated, and a lot more time-consuming. If I'm going to contact a client, then I have to put all of these tags, and that ticket is closed as the ticket has been sent. It's similar to when you send an email. That ticket has now been sent and therefore it's closed. If the client responds, the ticket will come back as open. However, if we send a ticket to a different department, let's say, then we have to put the ticket on as open to the different department and I'm not going to be able to see it unless the other department sends it and replies, and puts it back on my name as open. The ticketing feature is a bit complicated. In order to send a simple email to a client, I need three minutes. And due to the fact that we send a lot of emails, that amount of time required is time-consuming for us. Freshdesk has a feature called Freshchat. I would like to have translation services inside the chat. We get a lot of clients from different countries speaking different languages.

The reporting, analysis modules and insights capabilities for this solution could be improved. It is essential for us to know how many tickets are open on different business domains or open for specific teams. These insights drive decisions that happen in the technical support area.

When we ask them for changes or features, they usually provide a workaround or a feature. They stay on top of the latest technologies. The most significant feature they've added recently was two years ago. It was an AI chatbot, which is very important for business. They've gotten all the features at the right time and integrated them into the platform. There aren't any features that we want to enhance, but we need to mature in our usage of some of them. I can't say any feature is missing or needs improvement, but a tool's built-in features need to evolve customer feedback. We have a dialogue set up for that kind of feedback.

While it's good for a small number of tickets, definitely in the future, we will require something more powerful. I would prefer to have a lot more functionality. There's a bit of a trade-off between the price and the functionality. When we do choose the new solution, we will have costs go up.

There are a few things we have asked for, like a forward button. When a ticket comes in, we forward it, but it doesn't sync up with the forward. That is the one they have to rework. The other is when we forward the ticket, it doesn't go all, or certain things don't go with it. We have told them about it, and they are working on it. It would be better if they gave us a more standard reporting template. Although they already have some, many aren't usable. It would be easier if we had more templates to work with.

We have many cases where a ticket comes in, and it ends up having multiple team members working on it. It would be really nice to be able to assign a single ticket to multiple people, rather than having to create the parent-child hierarchy that they have set up. It generates a proliferation of tickets that I really don't want to have. Having to jump from a parent to one child and then to another child makes it harder for me to be able to see the entire case from end to end. A simple example is our new hire process or our termination process. We have people who leave. We also have people who come on board. We have got multiple people participating and doing things related to the leaving or onboarding process. Currently, I have to go to different tickets to be able to see whether all tasks are really done or not. If I could assign lots of people to one ticket, it would be really nice.

In terms of features, I can't think of anything that's lacking. It's a solid solution. I've only been using the solution for four months. It hasn't been long enough for me to know everything about the solution. Technical support is not the best. It could be much, much better and offer better support to users.