The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects the performance of the solution. Sometimes, the users are unable to send any emails.
A problem with this solution is with database security. Most data in databases with such products are not appropriate for securing data in databases. They are very good with documents that are stored on servers, but they don't know what to do with the data in the databases, and there is a lack of functionality. GTB has the best connectors to the database, but the product is not intended for securing databases. They concentrated only on endpoints such as notebooks, desktops, and servers, but there are no mobile endpoints in their environment. To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones. It's a simple interface, but it's not a problem. GTB provides everything from one the central web console. Another issue with this solution is, not only do you have to defend against intrusions from problems within the perimeters, you have to see what it is doing with the information from inside of your network. Inside the network, the bandwidth is too large but still requires inspection. External channels are one gigabyte and internal channels are forty gigabytes, and this presents a problem because you have to invest in hardware where the GTB is installed if you want to see what is inside of your network. The need to include mobile security, and DLP for mobiles. It should be like MDM, integrated with DLP, but I want it from a box, not from another developer.
What is data loss prevention? Data loss prevention (DLP) is a solution or process used to prevent data breaches and ensure that sensitive data is not lost, accessed by unauthorized users, or otherwise misused.
The tool should include better AI features. It must enable us to make some predictions based on the behavior of my network or the end users.
The solution’s performance must be improved. Endpoint OCR affects the performance of the solution. Sometimes, the users are unable to send any emails.
They need to improve the processing time. Sometimes the document is a little bit slow. The performance could be better.
The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements.
it is almost cover each area of your endpoint and Network as well,
It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent.
A problem with this solution is with database security. Most data in databases with such products are not appropriate for securing data in databases. They are very good with documents that are stored on servers, but they don't know what to do with the data in the databases, and there is a lack of functionality. GTB has the best connectors to the database, but the product is not intended for securing databases. They concentrated only on endpoints such as notebooks, desktops, and servers, but there are no mobile endpoints in their environment. To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones. It's a simple interface, but it's not a problem. GTB provides everything from one the central web console. Another issue with this solution is, not only do you have to defend against intrusions from problems within the perimeters, you have to see what it is doing with the information from inside of your network. Inside the network, the bandwidth is too large but still requires inspection. External channels are one gigabyte and internal channels are forty gigabytes, and this presents a problem because you have to invest in hardware where the GTB is installed if you want to see what is inside of your network. The need to include mobile security, and DLP for mobiles. It should be like MDM, integrated with DLP, but I want it from a box, not from another developer.